200,000 Year Old Statue Found On Moon

reply to post by m4ng4n

---

"IF YOU´RE NOT INTERESTED IN THE SUBJECT WHY BOTHER POSTING?!! "

If you think you can herd these cats you have a surprise coming. Anyway, we're not allowed to have fun poking holes in silly stuff? When did that happen?

Uh...I'll match your "Whoa" and raise you a "Holy Moly!"

That's incredible. Almost too good to be true. However, I do disagree with your opinion that the moon may have once collided w/ the Earth and somehow objects were transferred to the moon. The article states that the rock is made of an iron compound "found exclusively in the highlands of the moon".

This is a bit off track but I really didn't like this little snippet:




An angel doesn't automatically suggest Jesus worship. Angel's (or winged beings) are not exclusive to Christianity.

I have an odd thought that just occured to me:

Anyone remember the thread started just a couple weeks ago about the web-bot predictions and that things were going to start happening once NASA started revealing some evidence kept secret.

Well, this MIGHT be the beginning of that. I could also be COMPLETELY wrong.

I would post a link to that thread but it was sent to RATS by request of the poster after it was realized that there may have been unauthorized use going on.



Edit: I take back what I said about NASA revealing evidence since I just happened to miss the one flippin sentence that says NASA is completely denying the man's allegations.

[edit on 5-5-2009 by nunya13]

I think the entire story could be summed up in this part sentence.
If life on moon had beliefs regarding angels, then that must be proof of religion.
Now with the ever shrinking christian belief perhaps this is nothing more than a ruse to promote christianity.
Did the scientiest chip the angel out of moon rock or was the angel found in the moon rock?

that is the question!

go NASA

~double post~ -edit- ~

as soon as i finished that post i had a knock on the door.
i think it was Jehovah's Witness'. funny how they wouldn't even tell me what they were trying to sell or where they were from.
i had to read the first page of the book they gave me to find out anything.
all they said was they were here to support a new government. a government of peace. then they said they want to come back and have a talk. manipulative bastards.
they also tried to tell me all christianity was wrong except for "our belief".

hard to swallow. rude to spit.
damn you jesus. damn you.

[edit on 5/5/09 by spearhead]

[edit on 5/5/09 by spearhead]

wow, that is amazing!!!! I tried googling him, there were a few hits, but mainly back to the link you provided. great find though.

Doesn´t that depend upon who you´re asking?

Silly for one person is serious for another and as I said, if you´re not interested in such matters why are you here at this very site?

It´s possible to be serious and make serious posts and there are other ways to prove your point without using sarkasm.

I read more than I post and I see the same people debunk every tread on every level just as if they where only here to destroy for those who actually is interested in the subjects discussed here!

Here is the story in the weekly world news.

Link

If it's in the WWn it's bogus.

reply to post by m4ng4n

---

"I read more than I post and I see the same people debunk every tread on every level just as if they where only here to destroy for those who actually is interested in the subjects discussed here!"

If it's bunk, what's the problem with pointing that out? I mean, you do want credible evidence, don't you? Not just any hooey somebody decides to post? Or, perhaps you would rather have this site have the panache as WWN?

Just to let everyone know this story also came from the Weekly World News the same publication who brought us the "bat boy" a few years ago. I am hoping this is real but I highly doubt it...sorry.

Go head everyone put you leg out there, because it is getting pulled about a mile in length.


LOL!


What a load of ........

weeklyworldnews.com...

Look at the little picture in the lower left corner.....It's laughing.

[edit on 5-5-2009 by Realtruth]

reply to post by Gawdzilla

---

awww dammit! you're right! WWN for sure! Funny how bat boy was missing from the picture in the linked article though.....had to go find the original to verify. DAMMIT! I was getting ready to call my dad on this one as he's convinced there is "something going on on the dark side of the moon" lol ............. awwww shucks!

just to clarify, I do truly believe we are not the only intelligent life in this massive universe.... but some VALID PROOF would be damn nice! I was almost excited on this one....my bubble is always bursting

reply to post by jackieps1975

---

Aw don't give up, we true believers will have our proof someday, its just going to take a little time

Awsome stuff man.....wish it was msm...

The first time I saw the article Bat Boy wasn't there. When I went back he was. Somebody updated the site to provide the important info.

Apart from the other 'issues' with this story is the 'small' problem that MAN HAS NEVER LANDED ON THE MOON. C'mon folks - be real. If you think 911 was 19 angry muslims or JFK was not assinated then I pity you. Do some research, free your mind from the MSM and your life of slavery.

Biggest question is which of the many hoaxes is te biggest. Moon or 911?

reply to post by Gawdzilla

---

Nope, "true" believers (allegedly) do not need genuine evidence.

Something which hardly resembles or looks like one is more then enough to confirm their belief...

Lots of them come here because they need pat in the back, like-believers to agree with them, unconditionally

reply to post by warrenb

---

thats cool and all, but your source is terrible man.

I'll believe it if it comes up on a more reliable source.

I was expecting you to post that on page one. RL distracting you?

Woops. Almost had me going there for a minute.
Republication in a disreputable place like the WWW with their batboy logo doesn't necessarily have to mean it's a fake. After all, the story is right up their alley, so why wouldn't they publish the article?

I expect any factual news about ET civilization to come about via the news and of course, to be met with severe skepticism until it is thoroughly vetted.

They claim it's been known about by NASA insiders, but none are cited and none have come forth to confirm this and on top of that, NASA says the claims about this statue are false.

Until we have(multiple) independent lab tests that determine it's age and composition conclusively(carbon dating/mass spectrometer tests etc), the claims made by the article must be questioned.