Strange Creature Caught in Mexico, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 5-5-2009 @ 10:48 AM by CrashGecko
reply to post by paperplanes


This is not a discussion about steel traps. This is about the hoax only. You want to debate the trap issues open a new thread.


reply posted on 5-5-2009 @ 11:09 AM by LostNemesis
reply to post by acewilliams



The monkey in the pictures posted looks a LOT like the 'creature'. If this 'creature' is real, what are the chances that it could just be a horribly mutilated monkey, like the one pictured? As one poster already pointed out, it seems suitable for walking on the back legs...
....and it's not a dog or cat.

I think it more likely to be a messed up monkey, than anything other-worldly.

EDIT: Also the tail proportions.... The monkey in those pictures seems to have a VERY long tail. Sorry, the questions are not aimed at Acewilliams, but regarding his posted theory with images.



[edit on 5-5-2009 by LostNemesis]


reply posted on 5-5-2009 @ 11:29 AM by echodogene
reply to post by SnazzMeister supposing this is real, this creature would've had to have chewed off it's hand, since there is no blood or hand, to get away. also if it had a sophisticated brain it would have known which part of the hand to chew off, instead it is still attached with "nubs" sticking out. then again there is no sign of blood on it's mouth.
most trappers cover their traps with brush to keep them from being seen. this picture is too clean, the rocks even look as if they have been swept. you just happened to stumble on this pic but the person who did set this up is obviously sick, then to say he tried to drown this thing.
to me this is just proof of the sicko's out there. this is nauseating







reply posted on 5-5-2009 @ 03:33 PM by Gemwolf
reply to post by tatersalad



Everyone (well, most) stated why they believe the creature NOT to be real. Perhaps you could suggest reasons as to why you believe it is real?


reply posted on 5-5-2009 @ 03:37 PM by KSPigpen
It just isn't any fun if everyone says there's no doubt.

One could argue that the arm caught in the trap is consistent with the creature reaching for something on the trap and then recoiling when it sprung.

The missing hand could also be consistent with the limb losing circulation of whatever type fluid the creature ciruculates and either falling off and being eaten, or just lost.

I would think that an E.T. would have the decency to wear some clothes, but what do I know?

The radius and ulna are very interesting...common in primates...not sure about in E.T. or chupacabras.

The following skeleton looks very similar to what we are seeing, IMO...

Goeldi's Monkey

It might be interesting to note that The Goeldi's Monkeys are endangered, so it might make a person feel better to skin one that got caught in a trap and feign ignorance rather than admit to one dying a painfully horrible death at their hands.

The writeup on the OPs external link refers to an abnormal number of teeth...the Goeldi's has quite a few more than a standard monkey.

The lack of toes is very suspect as is the apparently broken tail...if you look at the left foot, there is obviously a very straight edge where toes SHOULD be....

Ok....I guess I can stop there...looks like a poor skinned monkey.

The bastards.


reply posted on 5-5-2009 @ 03:40 PM by jd140
reply to post by KSPigpen



It is a spring trap. You have to step on the plate to set it off. Just touching it won't do it.

It could not set the trap off in the posistion that it is in.



reply posted on 5-5-2009 @ 04:00 PM by KSPigpen
This DOES look like an older trap, so you are probably right about this instance, but there are traps available with the amount of force needed to spring being highly adjustable based on the intended 'game.'

Patent for adjustable spring trap mechanism

Trap at the hardware store for 11 bucks...

For the record, I don't believe this to be anything other than an unfortunate monkey, but am not going to say I know 'matter-of-factly' about it.

It would be awful nice to see the rest of the pictures the goons supposedly took of this poor thing.


reply posted on 5-5-2009 @ 07:39 PM by SnazzMeister
reply to post by nunya13



I completely agree. It goes to show how sick some people are, and if there are extraterrestrials out there judging us, there is no reason for them not to think of us as brutal, savage beasts. Maybe we are just too savage for them to even bother attempting contact.

However, I'm starting to lean more towards the skinned monkey story. Either way, whatever animal this is, I'm saddened by the amount of pain it must have suffered in its last moments. If it was an undiscovered creature, why drown it? That's just horrible.


reply posted on 6-5-2009 @ 11:18 PM by Schrecken Licht
As a taxidermist who has been practicing taxidermy for over 20 years I can clearly state that it is simply a skinned monkey of some sort. Basically it looks like it was skinned for a taxidermy mount and someone looking at the carcass came up with an idea...

I've seen tons of animals with and without skin, with and without trap injuries, in all sorts conditions from fresh to fully rotted. The missing/abbreviated fingers/toes would result from the skinning process - often the last joints must be removed from the rest of the carcass and then carefully separated from the hide to avoid damaging the hide. This is especially true of small animals.

Based on the out-sized cranium, it is likely a juvenile animal. In animals that are not fully grown, especially mammals, the cranium is always proportionately much larger than in an adult. Large head, small facial features, small mouths and teeth and large eyes - you see this in puppies, kittens and pretty much any young of any animal.

Speaking of teeth - the idea that this is a juvenile specimen is reinforced by what they said about the rootless reptile-like teeth. In juvenile mammals, even those with all their adult teeth already come in, it will be a while until the roots become solid. Until then, they are hollow and open-rooted - just like an alligator's! Also, during the process of the permanent teeth coming in, some of the deciduous teeth take longer than others to be pushed up and fall out. I have a bobcat skull with 4 upper canines - when it died the milk teeth had not yet been pushed out completely by the permanent teeth. It is indeed bizarre looking, and it does have more teeth than an adult bobcat would, naturally.

As a long-time taxidermist, that's my opinion on this one.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Strange creatures from Marianas Trench
  Posted 4 days ago with 26 member flags
\'Woolly mammoth\' caught on camera in Siberia
  Posted 3 days ago with 18 member flags
icelandic lake monster spotted! (VIDEO)
  Posted 4 days ago with 16 member flags
The Bridgewater Triangle
  Posted 18 days ago with 10 member flags
Shape-Shifting Dinosaurs by Jack Horner (TED Talk)
  Posted 1 days ago with 6 member flags
Bigfoot Attack...or is the Lizard Man in Georgia?
  Posted 10 days ago with 5 member flags
\'mutant spider fears at nuclear wastelab\'
  Posted 5 days ago with 4 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 15 hours ago, 113 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 13 hours ago, 93 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 10 hours ago, 63 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 17 hours ago, 54 replies