It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by NatureBoy
thanks - and happy to be of service
and now that i have some time to sit and think / pull some google links
here is the emperical evidence that demonstrates the claims made re the BWO are UTTER TWADDLE
CLAIM :
source
its very high silicon content of the BWO. It is 15 times above normal in the BWO.
REBUTTAL :
what is " normal "
is alu alloy 6061 " normal " with its silcone content of :
Silicon 0.4 – 0.8
NB - FIGURE = % BY WEIGHT
source
or how about LM6 ?
Silicon 10.0 - 13.0
again % by weight
source
now can the lay members of ATS - who have no advanced engineering education / technical backgroiund understand the absurity of the claim ?
there are numerous comercial alloys in use with > 10% silicone content
so how the hell can a sample have a silicone content 15 times normal ????????? that would require 150% plus
the " science " behind the claim is utter twaddle - and instantly transparent to anyone with the relevant education and or industry experience
its a ` biiig blow ` to my sanity that they have the gall to attempt to foist such a crude lie on UFOlogy
all it does is confuses people who dont know that the claim is false - makes the claimant look like a chuffing idiot and has skeptics laughing hysterically
"UFO hunters " and the idiots they persuaded to pose as " scientists " have shot them selves in the foot
and the only ` biiig blow ` is to the credibility of UFO reserach
The copper-free alloys are used for low- to medium-strength castings with good corrosion resistance; the copper-bearing for medium- to high-strength castings, where corrosion resistance is not critical. Because of their excellent castability, it is possible to produce reliable castings, even in complex shapes, in which the minimum mechanical properties obtained in poorly fed sections are higher than in castings made from higher-strength but lower-castability alloys. The alloys of this group fall within the composition limits:
Si 5-25% Mn, Cr, Co, Mo Ni, Be, Zr up to 3%
Cu 0-5% Fe up to 3%
Mg 0-2% Na, Sr < 0.02%
Zn 0-3% P < 0.01%
The high porosity is very apparent, along with the very fine microstructure. Flow lines are also apparent in these two shots. The coarse ones are easy to see, outlined by the porosity. A more subtle flow line can be seen in the 250X shot upon close examination, defined only by a slight difference in the density of the darker particles on either side. These kinds of flow lines are commonly observed in poor sand or die castings. These are caused by a failure of molten streams of metal to merge due to poor filling of a mold, incorrect die lubrication or incorrect injection pressures.
Originally posted by Seany
reply to post by m0r1arty
I find I watch UFO Hunters with such hopes
And usually they are crushed...
Originally posted by Sys_Config
When Mufon went into the UFO television business,, and trademarked the title UFOhunters name also, I had an unpleasant feeling, there might be tradeoffs somewhere down the line, and the language of disingenuous research claims creep in become more prevalent. It certainly doesn't help us in this case.
Originally posted by DaMod
Well now. I'm sure you are a smart guy and all but you made a few mistakes.
First of all AL-SI alloy is measured by atomic weight,
therefore since ALU has a higher atomic weight v silicon the number of 150% is faulty.
13 Al Aluminium 26.9815386(8)
14 Si Silicon 28.0855(3) 2
again % by weight
Silicon 10.0 - 13.0
Actually casting alu-si alloy 22-24% and those made by powder metallurgy can be as high as 40-50% Si.
This alloy would be closer to 75% based on atomic weight, which could not be made by any known method we know today....
If an engineer cannot understand this then you need to go back to school......
Originally posted by Seany
reply to post by m0r1arty
I find I watch UFO Hunters with such hopes
And usually they are crushed...
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
Knowing UFO Hunters it will turn out to be a smashed soda can with some sand in it, hence the high silicon content. Then the lab will say its inconclusive but it could be a dirty soda can, and then Bill will go apecrap and make up some wild story about what it was in his mind. That is my prediction. Anyone want to bet?
Our team will conduct a scientific test never-before-done on this unidentified metal. The results of this test could be revealing."
Originally posted by argentus
I want to tell you something else, and this is not an attack on your thread, just food for thought, okay? True skeptics are not people we should poke fun at. True skeptics are our friends, as they insist upon criteria and measurable parameters and keep us on the scientific path. Without them, we would be dancing in a world of constant input without challenge, and they make our information and our evidence better.
Want to know something? I believe in EBEs (or maybe I think "they" or some of "them" were terrestrial and here before us humans), however I depend upon true skeptics -- truthseekers who have not formed an opinion -- to test our views and judgements. I think of the late, great, Dr. Sagan, who, truth be known, wanted to believe in EBEs. He just needed real, verifiable, measurable proof. You can read his works and know on a visceral level that he wanted to believe. We can all learn a bit from his approach.
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
Knowing UFO Hunters it will turn out to be a smashed soda can with some sand in it, hence the high silicon content. Then the lab will say its inconclusive but it could be a dirty soda can, and then Bill will go apecrap and make up some wild story about what it was in his mind. That is my prediction. Anyone want to bet?