It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ufo reality
Brand new evidence from tests done show that the metal recovered by Mr. White matches no known aluminum alloy made on this planet.
It also has characteristics just now starting to be researched and developed at major universities and laboratories concerning its very high silicon content of the BWO. It is 15 times above normal in the BWO.
Originally posted by blujay
I wonder when they are ever, ever going to figure out that the only ones they are seeing are OURS! Hoomins have had the technology for years to make flying objects that look darn close the the et's.
I believe most of 'ours' are used as psychological warfare weapons.
Those nice men running all over the world doing their research are really just chasing their tails. When the time comes, we will all know just what is what.
source
its very high silicon content of the BWO. It is 15 times above normal in the BWO.
Silicon 0.4 – 0.8
Silicon 10.0 - 13.0
Originally posted by DaMod
I am not making a claim I am stating a scientific fact.
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by NatureBoy
thanks - and happy to be of service
and now that i have some time to sit and think / pull some google links
here is the emperical evidence that demonstrates the claims made re the BWO are UTTER TWADDLE
CLAIM :
source
its very high silicon content of the BWO. It is 15 times above normal in the BWO.
REBUTTAL :
what is " normal "
is alu alloy 6061 " normal " with its silcone content of :
Silicon 0.4 – 0.8
NB - FIGURE = % BY WEIGHT
source
or how about LM6 ?
Silicon 10.0 - 13.0
again % by weight
source
now can the lay members of ATS - who have no advanced engineering education / technical backgroiund understand the absurity of the claim ?
there are numerous comercial alloys in use with > 10% silicone content
so how the hell can a sample have a silicone content 15 times normal ????????? that would require 150% plus
the " science " behind the claim is utter twaddle - and instantly transparent to anyone with the relevant education and or industry experience
its a ` biiig blow ` to my sanity that they have the gall to attempt to foist such a crude lie on UfOlogy
all it does is confuses people who dont know that the claim is false - makes the claimant look like a chuffing idiot and has skeptics laughing hysterically
"UFO hunters " and the idiots they persuaded to pose as " scientists " have shot them selves in the foot
and the only ` biiig blow ` is to the credibility of UFO reserach