posted on May, 4 2009 @ 08:08 AM
It is an undeniable conclusion for me that there is indeed some kind of phenomena occuring globally which involves the sightings of strange lights,
and craft of unknown origin. This I consider to be a fact, and feel that science agrees with me on this.
From here we delve into the murky grey area of unknown things. The only physical evidence that has been recovered and tested on that may in
some way be related to the ufology field is the removal of implants by Dr. Roger Leir. Although his investigations are indeed capitavting and
fascinating, the cold hard turth is that there is not direct evidence linking the removed foreign bodies to an alien species. There might be
circumstantial evidence, based on his patients recollection of an interaction, or sighting of a UFO and possible abductions thereof. If this were a
court of law, such evidence may be considered, but would hardly be damning enough to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that ET are to blame.
Despite this, the foreign objects and the incomprehensible lack of reaction of the human bodies is compelling evidence, yet again, than an
unidentified phenomena is occuring.
There have been a myraid of reports of close encounters, so much so that there are classifications for these reports. Close encounter you say? Which
kind, 5th? 3rd? Not only this, but there are also two different classifications for those who have experienced an extremely up close encounter with an
alien species. A 'Contactee' - a person who has had a positive reassuring type of encounter; and An 'Abductee' - a person taken aganist their will
and who has experienced some level of mental trauma as a result of their encounter. Are these classifications the result of a growing type of social
hysteria, or have they evolved from the quantity and similarities within the testimonies of hundreds of people?
Throughout all of the reports on close encounters with an alien species I have read, there runs a theme on their messages to us. 'Do not be afraid,
we will not harm you. Peace, love and brotherhood.' Although the Abductees appear to be justifiably traumatised by their reported experiences, the
aliens themselves have not seemed to torture individuals with some kind of malign evil intent. As they have also yet to reveal themselves en masse to
the entire world's populations, one would hesitate to suggest a theory of world domination, or genocide as the motivations of such alien races.
From there I further question, what would an alien race(s) of beings who are apparently X years ahead of us technologically speaking, want with
our planet and our people? The only answers that have been provided seem to be to 'take responsibility for our actions as a species'. and 'to stop
killing our planet' or 'save ourselves from extinction'. This further begs the question, 'Why do you care what we are doing to ourselves?' Which
apparently they have answered as well. A convienent explanation arrives; the Intervention Theory. 'We helped make you' they explain, and like
despairing parents watching their rampant adolescent children run amok, they are here to guide us in the right direction and back on the right path,
to stay on the right side of the intergalactic railway tracks. This leaves me feeling somewhat annoyed. They do not want to "interfere" with us
enough to reveal their presence publicly, and yet they will quite happily "interfere" with the genetic structure of a primitive ape species and
create us in the first place? Well thanks Mom and Pop, great job with the birth, no need to stick around and raise us, I'm sure we'll do just find
on our own... oh we didn't? Well guess whose fault that might be?? Now you want us to own our mistakes? Just so we're clear, We're wrong,
you're wrong, so let's carry on. My point is that either Intervention Theory is not correct, or the Alien's are as illogical and unreasonable as
the human race. Or juuust maybe they also have the ingenious gift of deception.
Intermingled with all these reports of alien encounters there are stories of secret cover-ups and ner-do-welling within the military and governments
worldwide. There is a huge amount of paranoia concerning these 'secret shadow governments' contained hidden within what the everyman knows as his
local elected governing body. Is this paranoia of our governing bodies the results of an unbalanced mind, or as a result of a plethora of untruths
that have gradually come into the public arena as lies? Have thse small elite groups got access to alien craft and/or intimate contact with alien
species? Many would have us believe this to be true.
I could easily ask, but if this were true would not there be some evidence of it? Would there not be some leaking of information about these groups
and aliens? As there have been reports of people coming forward with such testimonies and reports of secret illicit activites going on, it would be
rather redundant. Are all these reports merely misinformation? I think the paranoia may be set too deep after over half a century now of suspicion and
distrust for even a full disclosure to heal it. For every truth 'they' reveal, the suspicious would then ask, what else are you hiding?
The only other thing to surmise is the similarities in reports. To take the angle of mass hysteria, imagination, hallucinations of malfunctioning
human hardware; let us consider the amount of similarities in reports. The boomerang shape; the cigar; the triangle; and the lights with
unusual behaviours. The aliens themselves come in Nordic; grey; insect-like; hairy dwarfs; michelin men; and just plain human to name a few. One
theory could be that with the onset of films and TV, and their growing prevalence in portraying aliens/UFO's; it has created a strong subconscious
suggestion of what UFO's and aliens look like, which accounts for the symmertry of different reports. To narrow down the frame of reference you would
have to eliminate this possibile contamination of the evidence of eye witness testimony. As difficult as this would be to disprove, such is the
difficulty in the proof of aliens.
In the end, the conclusions you reach will only ever be personal opinion based on however much information you can process, and the percentage of
which you deem to be truthful, accurate or possible as opposed to the amount of corresponding paranoia and distrust for the theories and information
that do not sit well within your own frame of reference.
[edit on 5/4/2009 by azurecara]