It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Compelling footage of a planet X like object near the sun shot on (21.04.09)

page: 9
60
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 4 2009 @ 06:46 PM
link   
reply to post by NathanNewZealand
 


It did look like it was close to the sun in the sky though, so I guess within the last week it could have moved either in front or behind the sun, for now.
If that's the case it should be visible again in a few more days.




posted on May, 4 2009 @ 06:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by notsoobvious

Nibiru is bunk, and this video is certainly not a sun or planet that one dude only caught on his cellphone, yet all the telescopes pointed at the sky completely missed it.


A lot of there astronomers out there receive government grants for the work they do. If Planet X is real and the governments are trying to hide it, then they aren't going to want people they're paying, spilling the beans.

If these astronomers have a choice between money and the truth, I'm sure most would pick the money. Because if someone did come out with great evidence the cash flow would most likely stop.

Just an idea, I'm not sure about the whole situation.

By the way, the object might be out of the visible spectrum of light that humans can see, and only show up on some cameras (like some UFOs). I tried looking at the sun with welding goggles and couldn't see anything.

[edit on 4/5/09 by dmorgan]



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 06:49 PM
link   
reply to post by ElectricUniverse
 


That's true.

And I agree with you. It could have been a ufo, not as in spaceship but literally as in unidentified flying object. Because, to me, it doesn't look like a lens flare either.

But IF it was a planet or passing celestial body, we would still be able to see it, fact, unless it has temporarily passed in front of or behind the sun.



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 06:52 PM
link   
reply to post by dmorgan
 


Not to mention the fact that IF those astronomers DID tell the truth, there would be worse punishments than merely stopping the money flow.



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 07:03 PM
link   
reply to post by tarifa37
 

if you look at the video again carefully
you can see the guys reflection right up on the glass holding a camcorder not a phone as was said eariler
it was most likely shot through double glazing thus producing the reflection



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 07:14 PM
link   
reply to post by dmorgan
 

And there are many, many more astronomers who do not receive government grants.

If this thing were planet and were now "behind" the Sun it would be many times larger than Jupiter. It would be causing havoc with the orbits of the planets.

If this thing were "in front" the sun it would visible. There are various ways to safely view the Sun. A Pinhole projector is probably the best.

This is not a video of a planet.


[edit on 5/4/2009 by Phage]



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 07:16 PM
link   
The reason the video is viewable in HD is because it was rendered in a HD resolution before being uploaded to youtube, you can do that to any video. Even if it is clearly NOT HD

[edit on 4-5-2009 by Welsh Jester]



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 07:28 PM
link   
I believe that your seeing a parallax reflection which occurs with really cheap zoom lensing. Two separate lens elements knocked out of registration. The light passes through the first concave element and the the air between it and the second convex element, causing a ghost reflection.



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 07:29 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Absolutly correct.

Not a planet.



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 07:54 PM
link   
It looks like an offset reflection of the sun internal to the camera.

I can think of a dozen things it could be, but not a planet. It is the same size as the sun. That's your first hint.

The moon is exactly the suns diameter in our sky. An astronomer could not miss something that massive even if falling down drunk and standing on his/her head.

If that was in orbit around our sun it would have hundreds of Jupiter masses and could be a star itself if a gas giant planet.

Sorry. You can get more information yourself to supplement this too.

GET: Camera type, model details on optics.
FIND: Location, direction and time of shot.
LOOK: Solar Astronomy reports and photos for day and time in question.

And just because you have a cut and are bleeding on your hand does not mean its a Stigmata. Look closer and use the bundle of neurons between your ears before you cry "Nibiru!"

ZG



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 08:36 PM
link   
It is lens flare. It moves less than the other, duller flare because it is closer to the source of the light creating it. If you'll notice, as the duller flare moves around, this "planet" tracks the motion, but only very slightly.

It would be helpful to consider that an object this large, in that position, would have been noticed by a few astronomers, mariners, pilots, and other skygazing types. Even if you postulate some grand conspiriacy to keep the existence of a planet from the public to "prevent panic", some amateur astronomer somewhere would spill the beans. Unless you're saying they just built this thing and slapped it into orbit around the Sun while we weren't looking.

Don't you think it's a little odd that this thing is the exact shape of the Sun, exactly the same color, and burning instead of reflecting the Sun's rays like any decent right-thinking planet should?

Or is it Pluto, seeking revenge for its loss of status as a planet?

Seriousy, folks, think lens flare. Telephones don't have lens hoods.



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 08:36 PM
link   
this would mean that the planet x object is larger than Jupiter if it is right up next to the sun like that.



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 09:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by Faiol

Originally posted by tarifa37
This is the phone he used ,it is a" Sony Ericsson W580i "and as far as I can gather does NOT shoot video in HD ,so I am at a loss to see how he loaded this vid to ytube in HD.But then again I know squat about that sort of thing.


[edit on 4-5-2009 by tarifa37]


you guys should shut up when doesn't know what is talking about

youtube HD doesnt mean HIGH DEFINITION, it means high quality ... youtube uses a compression and this high quality version doesnt hurt the oriignal video as much as the original compression ... I dont have the specifics but you dont need to be a specialist to see this ...


Wow dude. Did you really need to tell him to shut up before you answered his question? He even admits he doesn't understand all the details and requests clarification. How would you like it if you made a point and asked for more info and someone told you to just shut up? If anyone here needs to shut up its the person who cant be bothered to make sure his post contains proper spelling, grammar and punctuation(ahem).

The "internet tough guy" routine doesn't go over to well around here.

More flies with honey and all that.

[edit on 4-5-2009 by Tiloke]



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 09:33 PM
link   
It would have to be as bright or brighter than the sun to even be visible. I'll leave it to you unfamiliar with camera's to study them on your own.

It is a perfect circle with no corona and no glow.

So it is brighter than the sun, has no corona or glow?

It is either a lens anomaly, optical illusion or a hoax.

It would have been visible all day and not just at sunset were it a real celestial body and anyone, anywhere with a clear sky on this planet would have been able to see it. Don't you think somebody would have noticed?



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 09:44 PM
link   
SOHO LASCO C3 Latest Image
sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov...

Not nary a Nibiru in sight.



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 09:59 PM
link   
Breaking news:

Ive just receive a highly secret information, but this is ATS its ok to share among with you ppl.

It was Elvis Presley landing, yes folks, its for real, the king is back once again.
In a shinny and glorious decent from heaven!

... and "Elvis has enter the building!"

its a 2% sure, the others 98% is still going to a lens flare because the evidences.
Don't blame me, we are looking to take a recent photo of Elvis right now.

[edit on 4-5-2009 by theSeeker84]



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 10:25 PM
link   
The crazy thing to me is the haze on the horizon covering both of them. If this were a refraction due to a double pane, wouldn't the second image be reversed and not line up with the haze on the first?



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 10:31 PM
link   
I don't really know much about planet X...but the image goes behind the cloud...so far a lot of people claim to know what it is but are completely ignoring this fact.



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 10:49 PM
link   
I once spoke on this topic in detail though thought it best to wait till at least a year and a half to warn all once again. What would be the purpose of causing a pre-mature panic? I see it circulating alot recently. I suppose this cat is finally out of the bag? She has claws.

The best one can do is prepare. Govts. around the world have their reservations in the underground transnational tunnel network with their massive underground cities. A good audit of the Federal Reserve, IRS, IMF, the World Bank, the Bank for International Settlements and Central Banks of the world (owned by a few top-hats), should explain where a large portion of 'your' tax dollars went. Enraged? Well, you should be. Now what? I suppose a 'warning' to all you know could be a start?

I suppose you weren't invited to the bellows below? I have my own lil cave. There's plenty more for sale if your nimble. Well, perhaps one can wonder why govts. around the world are so bold lately and not too concerned for the rights of the citizenry. There is only so much room to include the world's politicians, illuminati, bankers, top scientists and certain VIPs in the recesses of the Earth. I hear hydroponics have 'really' taken over down there! Impressed.

Nibiru/PlanetX explained well here.

Massive Underground cities

The Black Budget/DUMB shelters. You've been 'fleeced'.

I suppose that's enough show and tell for now folks.

Prepare, though please do so with a 'sound' mind.
There is enough unstableness going around these days.
We don't need more.

'Good' day.
You have a choice.




[edit on 5-5-2009 by Perseus Apex]



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 11:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by reugen
reply to post by tarifa37
 


There are phones with 12 megapixel cameras, so no problem, capture to a 12gb memory stick and you can be kubrick everyday.


12MP for photos, no phone can do 12MP videos. In fact not even professional film cameras can. At least not before the new 28K Epic digital film camera is released. And just the body of that camera alone will cost you around 50,000.00 USD, pretty far from the price of a cell phone if you ask me. And keep in mind that a 50k film camera body is considered cheap for film standards.

The nominal resolution of 35mm film emulsions for film cameras -- which aren't cheap nor portable -- is between 4 to 8k (4096 - 8192 pixels for the vertical resolution). And for older or cheaper film stocks it's just a bit over 2k (2048 pixel vertical res). IMAX systems go way beyond that but they are far from portable or cheap too.

And I'm talking 60,000.00 USD just for a single film camera lens. So you can imagine the price of the camera body and all the bells and whistles required to use it.

For now the top video resolution that can be achieve in portable accessible solutions for the general public is 1080p (1920x1080 pixels) and even so you can't find cell phones capable of doing 1080p videos just yet.

And even if they do, they would probably use lot's of compression (maybe GOP based) and cheap CMOS and lenses that won't do wonders for you.

Also the comparison that the author of the video does between RGB values means absolutely nothing. Phone cameras don't work with float point raw formats so their values are always clipped within a 0 to 1 range or 0 to 255 range. The sun light goes way, way beyond that. So in this case there a loads of variables that could attenuate that.

This video even tho it's in fact interesting is probably just the result of atmospheric condensation where small particles of water act as a mirror for the sun light. This would explain it's relation to the sun both in size, position and also why it's passing behind the clouds.



new topics

top topics



 
60
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join