It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Compelling footage of a planet X like object near the sun shot on (21.04.09)

page: 3
60
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 4 2009 @ 08:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by Gawdzilla

Originally posted by _Phoenix_Uh yeah, once again I'm not sure why your directing this at me? hmmm


Sorry for any confusion. I was just pointing out the logical inconsistencies in the picture. Nothing personal, I assure you.


Ah ok no problem. Well good points for sure.




posted on May, 4 2009 @ 08:27 AM
link   
My goog god...none of you folks was able to make an educated guess...

it's Swamp Gas people....I mean how can you miss it.


Seriously though...wonders what it is???

[edit on 4-5-2009 by MoonandStar]



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 08:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by Biohazard³¹³
Oh boys it's just a reflection:



Could a planet be on the terrain?


That's not what we're looking at. Look to the right of the Sun.



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 08:31 AM
link   
Wouldnt the Earths orbit be affected if there were an object this big in the neighborhood? That thing is huge even if it is right next to the sun.



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 08:40 AM
link   
If this planet, or sun is out there, and I doubt very much it is, then why wouldn't it be VERY visible during a solar eclipse. All the footage I've seen from recent eclipses do not show a 2nd sun, or bright planet near the sun.




posted on May, 4 2009 @ 08:42 AM
link   
Ehen I saw the headline I thought "here we go again...", especially since nobody can define a planet-x like object (planet x has yet to be proven - especiallyi nthe form of Nibiru) but this is a very, very interesting video.

Starred and flagged - along with my rekindled optimism for the existence of Nibiru.



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 08:47 AM
link   
And how many other people worldwide can see this?

Didn't think so..

It's an optical error, probably due to shooting from behind double glazing with the bright sun being reflected back onto the window from say a mirror or tv screen behind the person filming.



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 08:48 AM
link   
It's an interesting effect although it really looks like some kind of effect, rather than an actual body. Planet X is yet to be proved and the search continues!



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 08:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by CherryDuck
cool. Star and flag. I would love to hear what the guys who have some experience in camera anomalies and digital editing have to say! I'm not a big niburi (sorry if spelling is wrong) believer, but anything like this is interesting. have we counted out editing? (tho i have no idea on how they've done it).

Cherry


it makes me suspicious that all these "anomolies" are shot THRU A WINDOW OR GLASS, take this shot outside and see if anyone gets the same image.



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 09:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
Well a lot more people than just one guy in Russia should be able to see this.

Plus he should be able to film it again without much problem.


..if it's real that is....


I agree on you on this Chad. unless they have spray that day !


Just had to .. But he should be able too film it every day..



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 09:02 AM
link   
I remember reading back in february was it, some sayd jupiter had ignited? I dont know if jupiter has come back out from the sun yet ???

Just dont say that is the little icy new astroid, IF this footage is real ...



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 09:05 AM
link   
This thing was shot with a cell phone. Right away that lowers the credibility. Cell phones are not known for their stellar optics. I believe most have plastic lenses instead of glass ones. I wish people who enjoy shooting videos would get REAL CAMERAS instead of the toy cameras that come with cell phones.

I agree with the posters who brought up GRAVITATIONAL EFFECTS. Something like Nibiru would cause all sorts of commotion in the astroid belt, not to mention the planets and their moons.

Lastly I want to reiterate that nobody who takes their data seriously is going to post it up with a crappy soundtrack on it. Serious researchers doing serious documentaries do not degrade their evidence with dopey music. Come on folks you are not shooting a music video. You are trying to convince the world you have serious evidence of a scientific nature. Your dopey sound track tells the world you are just another shmuck on the street trying to con people with cell phone footage.



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 09:06 AM
link   
this is my explanation , just look at the first picture taken from the video



in the white circle you can see a column.

now later in the video you will see that the planet x is infront of the column



im no expert , but its the way i see it , some thing wrong with the window or the lens as someone else pointed out is covered with some sticker as any new phone.

just thoughts

now im taking cover in case someone shoots at me



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 09:11 AM
link   
I cant see any thing up there with my Sun Filter atleast....



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 09:33 AM
link   
reply to post by tarifa37
 


I am to believe the Mythical Planet X, that can't be seen with Space
Radar, Telescopes, X-Ray Scopes, Radio Scopes because the Aliens
are able to move the Planet out of View was captured on a Handycam.

I don't believe to Planet X story in the slightest, so therefore this can't
be Planet X. The simpler more logical explanation is Lens Flare or somebody
is purposely shining a reflexion onto the lens.

One thing is certain, the Cameraman is sitting back laughing at all the
believers.



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 09:38 AM
link   
As some have already said, it could be a sun dog.

Sun dogs at wikipedia
Sun dog images at google images

Or maybe a reflection on the window from behind the camera, like this and a few other non-ufos:

Lamp reflection



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 09:43 AM
link   
The guy shooting the video is looking at the Sun from behind a Pane of Glass, thats the key thing thats missing from this description. From the reflections you see there are 2 "suns" when in mere fact its just 1 sun being reflected twice off glass into the Lens. The Glass acting like a filter and taking away the glare is whats causing the illusion to the right to look like another object when infact its just a reflected image thats filtered through reduced glare.
Sorry to burst your bubble guys and girls but being a Astronomer and Photographer myself (aswell as Meteorologist) I deal with this almost daily as im always photographing the weather and solar events.



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 10:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by Biohazard³¹³
Oh boys it's just a reflection:



Could a planet be on the terrain?


Maybe someone has pointed this out to you, but what you have circled on this photo is not the object in question. Though in the beginning the object is not clearly apparent, in many of the frames there is a Jupiter-sized ball immediately to the right of the sun that does not move relative to the sun in any frames it can be seen in (which are many).

If this is a hoax...it's a good one.



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 10:36 AM
link   
Might be down to the lens but who knows. The "planet x" seems to moving away from the sun which seems strange.
Would of thought more people wold of seen this though. Think of all the people who watch sunsets in places like ibiza and its not been seen anything like this:



posted on May, 4 2009 @ 10:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by tarifa37
This is the phone he used ,it is a" Sony Ericsson W580i "and as far as I can gather does NOT shoot video in HD ,so I am at a loss to see how he loaded this vid to ytube in HD.But then again I know squat about that sort of thing.


[edit on 4-5-2009 by tarifa37]


you guys should shut up when doesnt know what is talking about

youtube HD doesnt mean HIGH DEFINITION, it means high quality ... youtube uses a compression and this high quality version doesnt hurt the oriignal video as much as the original compression ... I dont have the specifics but you dont need to be a specialist to see this ...



new topics

top topics



 
60
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join