It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Compelling footage of a planet X like object near the sun shot on (21.04.09)

page: 14
60
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 6 2009 @ 12:45 PM
link   
FINALLY

(youtubeuser/ another uploader of this vid)
jeebsy12

found out that it was the MOON and the video had to be taken on 24.04.09

check it out by yourself and get Stellarium (sofware)

best regards




EDIT://#ty #..^^

I hate to say this but if it was the Moon, it would appear black, not as a reflective surface. The moon would be between the earth and the sun therefore it would occlude the Sun's light appearing black, not reflect it as seen here. And if it were the moon it would not reflect light in a full disk as appears here, but rather in a partial disk or crescent shape. Nor would it be anywhere near as bright. If it were this close to Sun it would be for all purposes invisible bc of the diff in brightness
[edit on 6-5-2009 by flashguru]

[edit on 6-5-2009 by flashguru]




posted on May, 6 2009 @ 01:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by tarifa37

Originally posted by Hellmutt
That video reminded me of a photo I took a few months ago. Same kind of effect.




Yep, and notice how the trees can be seen in front of the reflected sun but not in front of the real sun,due to the reduced glare of the reflection the trees can be seen .Exactly the same as the planet x video.


Something I don't understand about these photos you are comparing to the video. In the photos, showing the supposed effect from the video, the sun's reflection/refraction or whatever it is, that you can see the trees in front of, is the same size. How would one make the sun's 'duplicate' look smaller, and yet still hold the same foreground blockout of clouds or trees?



posted on May, 6 2009 @ 02:11 PM
link   
good to know where this is coming from... i finally found out that the user who uploaded it first on youtube was not the filmer..

it is coming from

2012god.ru...

anybody speaks russian? ^^ haha

cheers

COOL PICS THERE



posted on May, 6 2009 @ 02:24 PM
link   
Not great, but it does okay.

Google translated version of the website.

translate.google.com...



posted on May, 6 2009 @ 02:55 PM
link   
*strike*





posted on May, 6 2009 @ 03:01 PM
link   
I'm finding this strange that this single individual seems to have so many of these shots.



posted on May, 6 2009 @ 03:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by argentus
When I was watching this video earlier today, there was something that bothered me about it ..... but couldn't put my finger on it.

Well, it just occurred to me what it was. Both the alleged "object" and the Sun descend at the same rate from the perspective of the person shooting the video. I realize that the Earth is turning, not the Sun "setting", however if such an object existed in the sky and it matched the Sun's rate of descent at sundown, it would also be "twinned" with it the rest of the time.


I have a friend who makes lots of chemtrail videos which I edit for them sometimes and in this video you can see that the Sun is always covered up by Chemtrails and especially on the horizon. If you skip past the video and look at the 6:30mins mark you will see how its covered up. Maybe as a theory what if this thread is right and maybe the Chemtrails are stopping us from seeing it.





[edit on 6-5-2009 by The time lord]



posted on May, 6 2009 @ 03:34 PM
link   
reply to post by tarifa37
 


First off, I'm very sure this is not "Nibiru" or anything like that. If a planet was out there and that close, we should be able to see it all the time. Furthermore that thing moves around in odd ways that make no sense for a planet, which is a very, very big thing! I'm betting on some sort of mirage. There are lots of interesting mirage types that can distort the image of the sun.

What would a real Nibiru look like if it existed? Well, if it's far out, yet close enough to be seen, it should look something like any of the other planets, yet not in a position that they would be in, and it should be visible there day after day, and the movements could be tracked, and so on. If it's supposed to be approaching the Earth then this would be only seen near or at the time it "arrives", and it would be noticeable all over the world just as the Moon is now.

I'm shocked so many people starred up the post that started this thread.

(P.S. Nibiru would now be planet IX not planet X since Pluto ain't no planet any more!)



posted on May, 6 2009 @ 03:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Demonis
 


If it is being filmed/photographed through a double glas window, maybe the distance between the two pieces of glas determine the size of the duplicate? I don't know... thinking loud...



posted on May, 6 2009 @ 04:02 PM
link   
reply to post by The time lord
 



Contrails not chemtrails AND THE SUN IS NOT ALWAYS covered by contrails its BS and you know it!



posted on May, 6 2009 @ 10:52 PM
link   
It is most likley some type of reflective anomaly, look it's REAL simple - if it's only visible in pictures then it's a false image, get a pair of binoculars with filtered lens covers or better yet just look thru the filters (smoke grey 40 grade or better) & nothing is there,take a pic or vid & it is.This clearly proves that it is an anomaly of the recording device.



posted on May, 6 2009 @ 11:00 PM
link   
It`s not Planet X. Everyone with a knowledge of astronomy knows it is the mothership from Hale-Bop coming to pick up the Kool-Aid Kids and transport them to Zeta Reticuli. Get your Nikes ready.



posted on May, 7 2009 @ 01:18 AM
link   
reply to post by The time lord
 


In the original post I think that's a cloud not "chemtrails" to cover it up: it just looks too "cloudlike" and not what you get from an airplane, neither a regular contrail nor what any pictures of supposed "chemtrails" like to show. For one, it's way too dense -- the thing is completely blocked out! Face it: if this was a planet it would be visible over the entire hemisphere of the globe with line of sight to it. Nobody, and I mean nobody, would miss it. It would be useless to cover it up with a "chemtrail". I think we can safely file this one away under "yet another misidentified atmospheric/optical phenomenon".



posted on May, 7 2009 @ 01:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by bootsnspurs33
It is most likley some type of reflective anomaly, look it's REAL simple - if it's only visible in pictures then it's a false image, get a pair of binoculars with filtered lens covers or better yet just look thru the filters (smoke grey 40 grade or better) & nothing is there,take a pic or vid & it is.This clearly proves that it is an anomaly of the recording device.


Probably not a good idea at all to look at the sun with a pair of binoculars
that would probably blind you even with a filter.You would be magnifying the sun straight in to your eyeballs. People please do not look at the sun its not worth it.



posted on May, 7 2009 @ 01:44 AM
link   
As I said before, it is a film of the sun taken on two different days that are separated enough in time for the movement northward or southward to give a second image when the films are overlapped. NEXT



posted on May, 7 2009 @ 02:35 AM
link   
this is cheap but affective.

the yellow dot is the sun, the black dot is the camera.
the black line is the window and the grey line represents the flow of light into a camera lens.
this is what creates the second planet.




[edit on 7/5/09 by spearhead]



posted on May, 7 2009 @ 02:35 AM
link   
[edit on 7/5/09 by spearhead]



posted on May, 7 2009 @ 05:36 AM
link   
To start, I haven't come across any solid evidence that would lead me to believe in Nibiru just yet... I enjoy the discussion, but this is not Nibiru.

Sun Dog... Refracted/ Lens image... Whatever.



posted on May, 7 2009 @ 08:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by spearhead
this is cheap but affective.

the yellow dot is the sun, the black dot is the camera.
the black line is the window and the grey line represents the flow of light into a camera lens.
this is what creates the second planet.




[edit on 7/5/09 by spearhead]


While that makes some sense, isnt that the explination of a lens flare? If that were explaining what we are seeing in the video, it would happen with every camera, all the time. Which is not the case, obviously.



posted on May, 7 2009 @ 08:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by spearhead
this is cheap but affective.

the yellow dot is the sun, the black dot is the camera.
the black line is the window and the grey line represents the flow of light into a camera lens.
this is what creates the second planet.

A good approach which could explain most of it (a better explanation than lense flare since the lense flare would change when the camera is moving).
However, near the end, the "planet" appears to be covered by clouds, then by a building. Unlike the sun. So it doesn't really look like a second, less bright image of the sun.
Could it be that the reflection is real but the covering clouds and buildings are fake?



new topics

top topics



 
60
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join