It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by impressme
I did not expect this from Obama, I have to believe the shadow government that was behind George Bush, and his administration is still in power and pulling Obama strings.
Originally posted by dsm1664
This is my first post on ATS, I've been a visitor for a while, interested in various topics, but this particular one has prompted me to join and post.
Why do the American people need/want guns?
Simple question, look forward to the replies.
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by Tentickles
Yes, we do have some problems with guns here in the UK, but gun crime is far less here than the USA and the vast majority of British people have no desire whatsoever to own a gun and are quite happy with the current policy.
We have never had 'the right to bear arms' so it could never have been taken away from us.
I assure you we have enough problems here at the moment without adding to them!
However, I fully understand your stance and that of the majority of US citizens over this.
It is your constitutional right and something that is part of the 'American psyche'.
Originally posted by jd140
Originally posted by dsm1664
This is my first post on ATS, I've been a visitor for a while, interested in various topics, but this particular one has prompted me to join and post.
Why do the American people need/want guns?
Simple question, look forward to the replies.
Hunting
Protection
Sport
Because it is our right
Originally posted by Verd_Vhett
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by Tentickles
Yes, we do have some problems with guns here in the UK, but gun crime is far less here than the USA and the vast majority of British people have no desire whatsoever to own a gun and are quite happy with the current policy.
We have never had 'the right to bear arms' so it could never have been taken away from us.
I assure you we have enough problems here at the moment without adding to them!
However, I fully understand your stance and that of the majority of US citizens over this.
It is your constitutional right and something that is part of the 'American psyche'.
Right on you do have problems in the UK, and your going to have more remember the british Empire was one of the most Tyranical governments to ever exist, there Tyranny is what forced america to stand up and Kick there Royal buts back across the pond, and we did it because we had GUNS. I imagine the Brits would love to see Americans disarmed but its 200 years to late in there eyes. History repeats its self and unarmed populations never fair all that well.
Originally posted by dsm1664
Just because long ago in a galaxy far far away, someone wrote that it is "your right" doesn't mean it should still be valid today.
Originally posted by Hawkwind.
Isn't it possible that your guns being taken away is a price worth paying? You can use stun guns or cattle prods to protect you instead can't you? Does your defence HAVE to be lethal? Can you not use non-lethal devices instead? That way we won't have to read about kids accidently blowing their heads off because they've been playing with Daddy's gun? (okay I know tht particular example is rare but it's only an example)
I'll probably be subject to a few examples of situations where people's lives have been saved due to gun ownership but when it comes down to it abolishing guns would save more lives than having them, hide behind the second amendment all you like but that's a fact.
wiki/Monroe_Doctrine#Criticism
Other critics have interpreted the Monroe Doctrine as isolationist in intent.[who?]
Originally posted by Amaxium
So I take it that you do not support the "Bill of Rights" or the Declaration of Independance? Both were written a long time ago.
Originally posted by TheAssociate
If true, (it is infowars, after all) this doesn't surprise me. It only makes sense that the anti-gun nazis would use the Mexican drug violence as an excuse to make an attack on the Second Amendment.
TA
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Sorry to rain in your parade but you are wrong.
From that same article you posted.
MINDFUL of the pertinent resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly on measures to eradicate the illicit transfer of conventional weapons and on the need for all states to guarantee their security, and of the efforts carried out in the framework of the Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD);
First of all, reloading would be viewed as being "illicit", even though many people reload their own ammunition.
Second of all, this treaty will give sovereignty over to the United Nations.
Third of all, one of the goals of the UN is to disarm the people in every nation, which is part of their "Global Disarmament" policy.
]
BEARING IN MIND the United Nations Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat, and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects and the hemispheric contribution to its implementation, and the importance of taking concrete measures in the Hemisphere toward implementation of the national, regional, and global components of that Programme of Action;
Originally posted by jimmyx
ok...all you people...READ THE F'IN CIFTA PAPER COMPLETELY!!! it took me 5 minutes to find where they DO NOT ban ownership, sales, even trading of weapons...what's wrong with you.
www.nraila.org...
The measure calls for all handgun owners to submit to the federal government an application that shall include, among many other things: a photo; an address; a thumbprint; a completed, written firearm safety test; private mental health records; and a fee. And those are only some of the requirements to be licensed!
The bill would further require the attorney general to establish a database of every handgun sale, transfer, and owner's address in America. Moreover, the bill would make it illegal to own or possess a "qualifying firearm" -- defined as "any handgun; or any semiautomatic firearm that can accept any detachable ammunition feeding device without one of the proposed licenses