Sorry "Mr. Reheat", this is not a derail. It's a relevant question and
associated with the original post.
The idea that the official story includes the plane crashing in this hole
must be accepted by all of those who support the notion that terrorists
Unfortunately for the government loyalists, you cannot change one aspect
of the official story.
According to you, UA93 did not carry forward as suggested in your analysis.
Showing FBI photo evidence of a hole is a perfect tool to debate the
original post and your current position on UA93.
So once again, I ask:
Do you believe that a Boeing 757/767 could bore itself into the ground 165 feet?
Do you believe that digging down four feet into the ground would reveal
only part of the engine ... when common sense tells us a tail section,
seats, fuselage, wings, etc. should appear near the surface?
With respect to dMole and others at Pilots for Truth, feel free to contact
them directly. You are not banned. I am not your messenger. If you are
the man you say you are, and have expertise to directly discredit the
members at P4T, please show your value and post up.
As an administrator on P4T I give you my word that your post will stand,
and ensure your long awaited welcome to debate the facts.
Thank you once again for your expert response in advance "Mr. Reheat".
Tino "Turbofan" Desideri
P.S. I see Mr. Warren Stutt has put a nail in your FDR theory. Now you
all resort to a 'bird strike' hypothesis?