Israel destruction in 14 days?????, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 13 times


reply posted on 3-5-2009 @ 06:43 PM by Seany
reply to post by Night Watchman


hehe, does that make you anti-Iran ?

if you see injustice and speak out , it dosen't make you anti... the

other side


reply posted on 3-5-2009 @ 06:45 PM by Night Watchman
Originally posted by Seany
reply to post by Night Watchman


hehe, does that make you anti-Iran ?

if you see injustice and speak out , it dosen't make you anti... the

other side


But you see injustice on only one side...how interesting.



reply posted on 3-5-2009 @ 06:51 PM by Seany
reply to post by Night Watchman


In a perfect world, they would live together , Personally I would like to

see that, In a real world , you and I both know that these 2 countries will clash

We can argue who is in the right for days

The only thing we will agree on is that there will be no winners


reply posted on 3-5-2009 @ 06:52 PM by m4ng4n
reply to post by tamusan


"I cannot translate "Besser Bombe als bombardieren". Maybe it means "better to bomb than be bombed" "

Correct.


reply posted on 3-5-2009 @ 06:54 PM by JanusFIN
reply to post by Night Watchman


This blocking and warmongering against Iran has continued for years now... No one can say that we havent expect this to come. ( Axis of Evil )

If you look this from Iranian side - I can see us, the westerners very evil... I am not saying only Zionists are, but EU and USA are at same warmongering alliance.

Without 911 Truth, and history of "false flags" - I would say they are wrong, but its us who have made those picture from "evil muslims" from them - Its us, who have done those false flag operations, accused them from crimes we have done our selfs - Isnt that evil?

I see western world very corrupted, our politicians are just puppet of banksters - they are mostly driven by shadow governments - if you ask me - I see our nations just as evil, maybe even more than them.

I support peace and cooperation - I see Iran, Syria, North Korea has all the same rights to any high tech than other nations - But I am part of small opposition of good will.

Religions sucks, both sides - I prefer to Ateism and Buddism.


reply posted on 3-5-2009 @ 07:08 PM by Chevalerous
reply to post by Walkswithfish


Sorry for asking, but was Netanyahu elected by the people?

I thought the center Ms. Livni from Kadima, the current foreign minister won with 28 seats against Netanyahu's 27 - and together with Likud forms the new goverment?

That Netanyahu now was chosen premiership I understand, since a majority of parliament members said they supported Netanyahu for prime minister.

But I don't think that is the same as to say that Netanyahu was elected by the people as Prime minister?


reply posted on 3-5-2009 @ 07:11 PM by Walkswithfish
reply to post by Chevalerous


I said the Israeli people and government have spoken... Despite the process he is the top guy.

You make some interesting points, not unlike how Bush won over Gore some years ago.

There is a difference, does he have a clear mandate from the people?

Does it really matter?




reply posted on 3-5-2009 @ 07:14 PM by dooper
reply to post by intrepid

Intrepid, there are two thoughts on how to conduct war. One is to dialogue, the other is to act.

"We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analyzing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will. I cannot believe that such a program would be rejected by the people of this country, even if it does mean the establishment of personal contact with the dictators."

Neville Chamberlain wrote that, trying to purchase peace at any cost. As a result of not addressing Hitler while his forces were more manageable, in Europe alone, 40,000,000 died.

By contrast, Alexander knew the principles of warfare when he stated, "It is important to win morally as to win militarily. By which I mean our victories must break the foe's heart and tear from him all hope of contesting us again. I do not wish to fight war upon war, but by war to produce such a peace as will admit no insurrection."

Of the two approaches, Alexander had it right.

Ruthless force resulting in catastrophic destruction will win long-term peace.

Right now, you can't pry German troops out of Germany. They don't like war, they don't like fighting. The Japanese don't even want a military.

I would suggest that the words of Alexander have proven true over the millennia.

He on defense does not fight war, he can only endure it.

When a people, government, or a President has suggested that your government must be wiped out, then prudence requires you take them at their word.

It's not nice, it's not polite, but when threatened, those threats that are eliminated, are no longer threats.

And let no one make a mistake. The Arabs hate the Persians, and the Persians hate the Arabs. The Islamic requirement to kill Jews is the only thing that binds them.

But even the Arabs in the region are scared of Iran.

Therefore, the enemy of my enemy is not always true.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Poland Beekeepers Win Ban on Monsanto\'s GMO!
  Posted 12 days ago with 74 member flags
Girl, 16, Kills Herself After Researching 2012 Doomsday Threads...
  Posted 9 days ago with 49 member flags
AP IMPACT: Evacs and drills pared near nuke plants
  Posted 11 days ago with 31 member flags
Plane Crash!
  Posted 18 days ago with 27 member flags