Israel destruction in 14 days?????

page: 3
13
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on May, 3 2009 @ 06:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Night Watchman
 


hehe, does that make you anti-Iran ?

if you see injustice and speak out , it dosen't make you anti... the

other side




posted on May, 3 2009 @ 06:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Night Watchman

Originally posted by intrepid

Originally posted by Night Watchman
Good to see Janus isn't afraid to show his anti semetic leanings.


And what do you base this on?


his body of work here. He is as anti-israel as one can be. You can look it up yourself


I agree with you.

That said, PLEASE!! stay on topic.

The topic is what may or may not happen between now and may 14th.

Intrepid, as a mod, you should know better and keep to the topic at hand.
If you need to do some modding to an individual, please be clear that you are or u2u them.


[edit on 5/3/2009 by mrmonsoon]



posted on May, 3 2009 @ 06:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Seany
reply to post by Night Watchman
 


hehe, does that make you anti-Iran ?

if you see injustice and speak out , it dosen't make you anti... the

other side


But you see injustice on only one side...how interesting.



posted on May, 3 2009 @ 06:46 PM
link   
I swear, I do not understand those who think the US blindly supports Israel.

Iran, though proxies, has attacked the US for over two decades, using Hizballah, and every other radical Islamic group they can fund. Our embassies were attacked, our soldiers were attacked in Lebanon and the Khobar Towers.

Does anyone else remember any of this?

So no, Iran is not just the enemy of Israel. Iran is the enemy of the US.

The pantywaist we have in the White House will likely be our next war President.

Because the thing about international bullies, is that they see a pantywaist, force a fight, and then when our backs are to the wall here in the US, we finally fight.

Right after tasting the blood in our own mouth.

Israel isn't going to rely on the US.

They'll do what needs to be done, and if we're smart, we'll help them survive the ordeal.

Because we don't have the guts to do for ourselves.



posted on May, 3 2009 @ 06:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Night Watchman

Originally posted by JanusFIN


- Looks like Iran has made their conclusions, war can not avoid - and there will come no talks... Prepare for war people!

Very, very sad news - But I understand their situation. Embarassing UN confrence was maybe the last step - and president of Iran understands that there is no one who to speak with in western world...

They are fighting against the evil now - and thats us, guys - we should look to mirror now.


Iran is reportedly going to attack Israel and you are calling Israel evil?

Iran can't be this stupid. They are stupid enough to give Israel the opportunity to eliminate them.

Good to see Janus isn't afraid to show his anti semetic leanings.


And there you go!!!

I myself have a very hard time to see why a person ALWAYS has to be called an anti-semite as soon as one says anything NOT in favor for Israel.
Please stop it right there this is a matter concerning two countries with different views on culture, economy and practically everything and if Iran and the rest of the arab and persian community don´t share their opinion with Israel I for one have no problem whatsoever understanding why, but then again my opinion isn´t formed by the media or the state.

Most Scandinavians use their own brain instead of the one that were handed out by the winners of the last war. Winners get to write history right?



posted on May, 3 2009 @ 06:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by dooper
Iran, though proxies, has attacked the US for over two decades, using Hizballah, and every other radical Islamic group they can fund.



Israel isn't going to rely on the US.

They'll do what needs to be done, and if we're smart, we'll help them survive the ordeal.


Do you not see this as the equal and opposite reaction the Newton put forth? What makes one right and the other wrong?



posted on May, 3 2009 @ 06:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by mrmonsoon

That said, PLEASE!! stay on topic.

The topic is what may or may not happen between now and may 14th.

[edit on 5/3/2009 by mrmonsoon]

Yes, of course you are right and I apologize.

This is a very disconcerting report and I hope, and believe that it is not accurate. Not that Iran would not make such a proclamation but I don't believe they would be stupid enough to take such action.

I certainly have a problem with the Islamist Govt in place in Iran but they are a country that does not historically attack but rather respond. I think this is all for show...



posted on May, 3 2009 @ 06:50 PM
link   
I fear that Israel will find herself on her own at the onset of war with Iran.
The U.S will not want the repercussions from the oil producing nations.
Our economy is on the ropes right now,a new war and a new oil embargo would put us over the top.

If Israel drops the bomb on Iran....It is going to get real nasty really fast!!!!



posted on May, 3 2009 @ 06:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Night Watchman
 


In a perfect world, they would live together , Personally I would like to

see that, In a real world , you and I both know that these 2 countries will clash

We can argue who is in the right for days

The only thing we will agree on is that there will be no winners



posted on May, 3 2009 @ 06:52 PM
link   
reply to post by tamusan
 


"I cannot translate "Besser Bombe als bombardieren". Maybe it means "better to bomb than be bombed" "

Correct.



posted on May, 3 2009 @ 06:54 PM
link   
reply to post by Night Watchman
 


This blocking and warmongering against Iran has continued for years now... No one can say that we havent expect this to come. ( Axis of Evil )

If you look this from Iranian side - I can see us, the westerners very evil... I am not saying only Zionists are, but EU and USA are at same warmongering alliance.

Without 911 Truth, and history of "false flags" - I would say they are wrong, but its us who have made those picture from "evil muslims" from them - Its us, who have done those false flag operations, accused them from crimes we have done our selfs - Isnt that evil?

I see western world very corrupted, our politicians are just puppet of banksters - they are mostly driven by shadow governments - if you ask me - I see our nations just as evil, maybe even more than them.

I support peace and cooperation - I see Iran, Syria, North Korea has all the same rights to any high tech than other nations - But I am part of small opposition of good will.

Religions sucks, both sides - I prefer to Ateism and Buddism.



posted on May, 3 2009 @ 06:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Seany


The only thing we will agree on is that there will be no winners


Fair enough and we can certainly agree on that, my friend. I still hold out hope that Iran will not act in way that is contradictory to it's history.



posted on May, 3 2009 @ 06:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by dooper
I swear, I do not understand those who think the US blindly supports Israel.


Not blindly. By laws and legislation.

Even President Obama shortly after taking office reaffirmed that the USA will defend Israel.

He has even stated that Iran is a great threat.

The US support and defence of Israel cannot be disputed.

I personally disagree with it, as I believe it has caused more problems in the middle east than prevented.



posted on May, 3 2009 @ 06:56 PM
link   
Another thing to possibley consider. I wonder if perhaps Iran may have some kind of Ace up thier sleeve that people don't know about, making them feel confident in making such a grand statment.....

Food for thought.


Russia...China....something else perhaps.



posted on May, 3 2009 @ 06:58 PM
link   
It is common for Iran to threaten Israel.

It is common to call for their removal, blah, blah, blah....

What bothers me is there seems to be a date that Iran, in my opinion, has acknowledged.

Since we are dealing with translations, i believe the reference to a date set by Israel is a misunderstanding in the way that not all languages explain the same thing the same way.

Further, "IF" Israel had set a date to bomb Iran, why was it not listed in the article???



posted on May, 3 2009 @ 07:05 PM
link   
You want to be careful who you tie your wagon too

All is not as it appears

Israel attacking the US ...www.abovetopsecret.com...

If you want to deny the truth , dont open the link



posted on May, 3 2009 @ 07:08 PM
link   
reply to post by Walkswithfish
 


Sorry for asking, but was Netanyahu elected by the people?

I thought the center Ms. Livni from Kadima, the current foreign minister won with 28 seats against Netanyahu's 27 - and together with Likud forms the new goverment?

That Netanyahu now was chosen premiership I understand, since a majority of parliament members said they supported Netanyahu for prime minister.

But I don't think that is the same as to say that Netanyahu was elected by the people as Prime minister?



posted on May, 3 2009 @ 07:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Trayen11
Another thing to possibley consider. I wonder if perhaps Iran may have some kind of Ace up thier sleeve that people don't know about, making them feel confident in making such a grand statment.....

Food for thought.


Russia...China....something else perhaps.


This has also crossed my mind. The last couple of weeks Irans government has gotten a bit more cocky compared to reent years.

I just hope we´ll never find out, but in this banking world this seems more like an utopia...



posted on May, 3 2009 @ 07:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Chevalerous
 


I said the Israeli people and government have spoken... Despite the process he is the top guy.

You make some interesting points, not unlike how Bush won over Gore some years ago.

There is a difference, does he have a clear mandate from the people?

Does it really matter?




posted on May, 3 2009 @ 07:14 PM
link   
reply to post by intrepid
 

Intrepid, there are two thoughts on how to conduct war. One is to dialogue, the other is to act.

"We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analyzing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will. I cannot believe that such a program would be rejected by the people of this country, even if it does mean the establishment of personal contact with the dictators."

Neville Chamberlain wrote that, trying to purchase peace at any cost. As a result of not addressing Hitler while his forces were more manageable, in Europe alone, 40,000,000 died.

By contrast, Alexander knew the principles of warfare when he stated, "It is important to win morally as to win militarily. By which I mean our victories must break the foe's heart and tear from him all hope of contesting us again. I do not wish to fight war upon war, but by war to produce such a peace as will admit no insurrection."

Of the two approaches, Alexander had it right.

Ruthless force resulting in catastrophic destruction will win long-term peace.

Right now, you can't pry German troops out of Germany. They don't like war, they don't like fighting. The Japanese don't even want a military.

I would suggest that the words of Alexander have proven true over the millennia.

He on defense does not fight war, he can only endure it.

When a people, government, or a President has suggested that your government must be wiped out, then prudence requires you take them at their word.

It's not nice, it's not polite, but when threatened, those threats that are eliminated, are no longer threats.

And let no one make a mistake. The Arabs hate the Persians, and the Persians hate the Arabs. The Islamic requirement to kill Jews is the only thing that binds them.

But even the Arabs in the region are scared of Iran.

Therefore, the enemy of my enemy is not always true.





top topics
 
13
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join