It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
reply to post by Freezer
Its not character assasination. I said earlier he is a performance artist. His joy is in seeing how people react to his works. It is like live art. There is nothing wrong with it. Its kinda cool, but you cant be treating it like its fact until it is proven to be something other than a trick.
I suggest if you are John Huchinson's friend you recomend that he keep some notes about what he does so he can reproduce it in front of some one. If he can do what he says and can reproduce it he will become a very wealthy man. [edit on 4-5-2009 by justsomeboreddude]
Originally posted by Freezer
I can agree with you there, and I could never say it's fact, as there is no documented proof, and therefor can't be "scientifically" verified. You are also right about taking "notes", and this is why is it very hard to reproduce his effects. They only happen at precise settings, and if one doesn't log those exact settings it will be like the lottery in finding them again. I believe this is why Hutchison fails to reproduce on demand the effects that he has found. As for the wealth, he has stated many times he's not interested in becoming rich off this. The reason he does it is because he is fascinated with "uncovering natures secrets."
I find it funny that someone like Boyd Bushman who has stated much bolder claims would not be as harshly scrutinized as John, being that he has rock solid credentials, and the patents to back up what he talks about, such as a energy beam type device which has a portable endless power source, which can levitate objects with ease. Of course, that's impossible right?
Originally posted by Freezer
reply to post by evil incarnate
Can you "debunk" his crystal battery? I didn't get an answer to that one..
If you think shaking objects in a cardboard box is the same as what Hutchison did, I don't know what to tell you..
Originally posted by Grifter.be
i am not claiming to believe the man, but...
i do wont to comment on the U7FO with string movie. You see something bothers me. If the string would pull the UFO (since i do not know of a string that can push) then the cord should be loose when the ufo is laying down and it should become firmly straight when pulled. But somehow this here is working reverse. When the ufo rises the string becomes loose, or...
Could it be that the string is getting pulled by gravitational forces?
Originally posted by Deaf Alien
reply to post by Grifter.be
This might help you with your question.
www.skywise711.com...
Originally posted by evil incarnate
OK, I can easily debunk any of Hutchinson's projects. Not one person of integrity has ever witnessed any of these events and been able to examine the evidence. You believe some old films and some new youtube videos.
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
I am pretty sure all patents are in the public domain.
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
So you are saying that no company or venture capital firm or university or rich guy went out and bought some $5000 magnets to test this. Gee, I wonder why that would be?
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
Seems like a small price to pay for verifying the existence of antigravity.
Originally posted by AlienMike
Originally posted by RubberBaron
I heard Hutchinson admit on Coast to Coast that some of the video was faked because he was under pressure from a TV company. So yes, he is a proven fraud by his own admission.
Do you happen to know what year and month? Maybe you could provide a link to it, saved on YouTube maybe? That would surely be some "incriminating" evidence!
C'mon hes been doing these videos for how long? Someone has found evidence in all those videos of a string, some proof of video editing or something, right?
Originally posted by Freezer
Originally posted by evil incarnate
OK, I can easily debunk any of Hutchinson's projects. Not one person of integrity has ever witnessed any of these events and been able to examine the evidence. You believe some old films and some new youtube videos.
Maybe you didn't read what I said so I will write it again very slow for you. I don't think there is "scientific" proof of what he did. Get it?
Sorry I don't consider shaking objects in a cardboard box proof of a hoax. I also don't consider lack of witnesses proof of a hoax. A bear can take a dump in the woods and nobody might see it, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen.
I can also photoshop a ufo into a picture. Does that automatically mean that if I take a real picture of a ufo it's fake. Not quite.
You said you can debunk any of Hutchison's projects, and I asked where is the proof Hutchison faked the crystal battery?
Also where is the proof Marcus reid faked the Hutchison battery?
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
reply to post by Freezer
Dude, my whole point was that no one reputable built any of this because they know a magic trick when the see one. If there was even a glimpse of hope that Hutchison's or Bushmans claims were valid big money people would be all over it.
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
reply to post by evil incarnate
Dude, now that hurts. Everyone knows unicorns are real. My sister had posters of them, books about their many fantabulous adventures, and even toys that look just like a unicorn. How could someone make a toy that looked just like a unicorn if they didnt exist? Answer that you dirty skeptic.
Originally posted by Freezer
So because "big money people" haven't duplicated Bushman's opposing magnet experiment means it's a magic trick. Alrighty then, great logic.