It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
1. Explain how hot exhaust can not create ice crystals, in a supercooled environment
2. Explain how contrails will not form a cloud layer
3. Explain why contrails will not persist
1. If the government allegedly are spraying nasties at such a height, why would they not do something easier like poisioning a drinking water supply?
2. Explain how something being sprayed at such a height, defies all logic (and winds), and somehow reaches the ground below where it is originally released from?
3. Some chemtrail websites claim that the phenomenen has been occuring since the nineties. Explain why persistent contrails exist in pictures since from before 1920, and why contrail science existed far before the chemtrail theory was even thought of?
4. Explain why almost every meteorologist in the world knows nothing about upper atmosphere, and the population of chemtrail believers (including rense cliff carnicom and david icke), is more knowlegeble on meteorology than those trained in the science.
Originally posted by logician magician
The real chem-trail airplanes which release high altitude chemicals into the air have infused the chemicals with high efficiency anti-freeze technology which only freezes at temperatures near absolute zero. This is very advanced secret technology, and the proof is in the pudding!
They are using your own years and years of meteorological education against you and other experts because they know you'll be their tool to inform the rest of us that "nothing strange is happening"
Face it, Oz! You have to be uneducated (un-INDOCTRINATED) in the "science" of "weather" to even understand it.
You're just too smart for your own good.
With proper timing and chemical makeup, the contrials can be engineered to disperse and varying frequencies, often dependent on the type of chemtrial being deployed over the population.
They only persist as long as it takes their partner chemtrials to reach the destination on the ground. All of this is precalculated before the chemtrial flight.
Because many conspiracy theorists and health advocates don't drink tap water. Chemtrails kill two birds with one stone - the normal sheeple AND the conspiracy nut. Also it is important the the chemicals effect vegetation, animals, and birds.
Chemtrial planes guide the particles over specific land areas by emitting electromagnetic wave guides which guide the particles downward and virtually nullify any effects that the wind would have otherwise. Also, some people believe that the chemtrial partner-particles are magnetized or otherwise attracted to the ground below, perhaps due to electromagnetic interaction between the particles and the power grid.
Because Chemtrials are hidden within the phenomenon of contrails. If we suddenly had odd trials in the sky without a scientific "reason" for them, then more people would get suspicious. Since there is already an explanation for what we see in the sky, the majority of the people will write it off.
Because of your meteorological education, you are not open to new ideas. You already think you know everything about the weather as it is.
I take it you haven't done any theoretical meteorological work? You just leave that up to the smart people - the physicists and the conspiracy theorists.
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
First of all, thankyou for being the first to respond to the questions i put in the opening post
If the proof is in the pudding.....wher is the pudding? Simply stating that this technology exists, without evidence or even a methodology does not mean its fact.
Okay, so the last few hundreds of years of chemistry, physics and meteorology are also incorrect? Its not just meteorological science, its also other areas, which makes an awful lot of scientists being involved in the coverup.
Also, are you saying that intelligent people are too "stupid" to understand conpsiracy theories? How can a lack of understanding on a subject be an indicator that you know more about that given subject...its doesnt make sense
Please elaborate on this
Then how can you tell the difference? This also doesnt make sense. If it were that sinmple, then the public wouldn't even have the slightest idea that anything was going on
Ok, fair point, then why not just taint bottled water supplies and other food sources. Still a much easy, effective, not to mention cost effective way to achieve a sinister goal
Oh, this just keeps getting more far out, lol
I will admit Im not the best on electromagnetism. Maybe you could elaborate or maybe someone else knows something about this topic
The high voltage overhead lines create Ions, charged particles. These particles become attached to pollutants in the air, which in turn, become more attracted to people. The pollutant will then stick to the skin or be breathed in. The theory goes, once in the lung, the pollutants will cause lung cancer.
The high voltage overhead line is not itself harmful, but its presence will attract and concentrate the pollutants from car exhausts etc, and these will accumulate downwind of the overhead line. It is claimed this effect has been missed in all previous work as all the research associated with overhead lines has looking for magnetic field effects, not electric field effects.
But wasnt it chemtrail advocates that proclaimed there were no trails of any kind before the nineties? Contrails have been doing the same thing for many years now, the only reason they are more noticeable is due to the exponential growth of air travel.
And yes I have had to do theoretical meteorology work, its part of training. You cant actually learn anything about the weather unless you do some theory and study it. The theories actually prove the observations that we view, so meteorology is a science, not an idea.