Originally posted by sine.nomine
reply to post by Alvert

---

I think you made some major errors in your power point presentation. On page 17 of your presentation, you state that "the bridge and Columbia Pike would have to be beneath the cab, when in reality we know the bridge is to the left of the cab." But the photo suggests that the cab is on the bridge, not above it. The photo is taken toward the end of the bridge, the rest of the bridge being off the right edge of the photo.

You also state "we know the bridge is between poles A and pole B." However, slide 10 of your presentation shows that poles A and B are along the bridge on the same side.

On page 20 of your presentation you assert that the Columbia Pike would have to run into the impact zone, but the map on Slide 10 shows that Columbia Pike runs into the parking lot shown in Slide 20, running under the bridge right where it should be.

Originally posted by sine.nomine
reply to post by Alvert

---

I'm sorry, but your counter points have no substance behind them. I'm not gonna argue in circles. As six sigma stated, there are over a dozen pages of replies pointing out the mistakes in your presentation. Whether you won't or can't understand them is irrelevant.

Originally posted by VonDoomen
reply to post by Craig Ranke CIT

---

Great work OP!

This is by far one of the best posts ive seen on ATS. I wish I could give you more flags.
This certainly raises a few questions. Its to bad you couldnt push more info out of him!