It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

80% reduction in CO2 = let the human culling begin

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 30 2009 @ 06:11 AM
link   
nwocollapse.freehostia.com...

80% reduction in CO2 = let the human culling begin

In the name of Rothschild-invented "climate change", some CO2 reduction targets are as much as 80%. Let me spell this out as clearly as possible:

Humans inhale oxygen and exhale CO2.

Plants inhale CO2 and exhale oxygen.

By reducing the levels of CO2, you are reducing the levels of oxygen. This is in preparation for a culling of the human population.

As the world becomes more industrialised and developed, the elites no longer require us to build their stuff any more. This is part of the reason the Western economies are based on services and not goods.

Officials from the UK government have said that our population needs to be reduced by 50%. It is the majority view within science that the Earth is overpopulated.

Eugenics is the name of the game. Realise it. I'm not going to say the recent swine flu is their attempt at mass culling, but it sure does make you get accustomed to the idea of death.




posted on Apr, 30 2009 @ 06:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by nwocollapse
Humans inhale oxygen and exhale CO2.

Plants inhale CO2 and exhale oxygen.

By reducing the levels of CO2, you are reducing the levels of oxygen.


Wrong. Carbon is not the limiting factor of plant growth. Their growth is mostly nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorus) limited. Obviously water can be a limiting factor too.

[edit on 30-4-2009 by rhinoceros]



posted on May, 1 2009 @ 12:53 PM
link   
With the amount of rainforests that have been burned in the name of capitalism, I welcome their attempts to reduce the CO2.



posted on May, 1 2009 @ 04:16 PM
link   
Carbon dioxide dissolves in water, forming carbonic acid. If CO2 levels get too high, the algae that's evolved for lower levels of acidity will die off, essentially removing half or more of the world's production of oxygen.

Not to mention that most goals are to reduce EMISSIONS by some level, not the actual levels themselves. (which might be rather hard to do, since except for what is used by plants, or dissolved it in the oceans, we really don't do a whole lot of removing CO2 from the air)



posted on May, 1 2009 @ 08:11 PM
link   
I've been telling people for years we need a serious population reduction - ZPG from the 60's remember that? Culling the human herd, I'm all for it. 80? Not good enough, make it 90% - I likes me some elbow room.



posted on May, 1 2009 @ 08:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
I've been telling people for years we need a serious population reduction - ZPG from the 60's remember that? Culling the human herd, I'm all for it. 80? Not good enough, make it 90% - I likes me some elbow room.


Would you settle for 30 good years ?

Or would you run ?


Logans Run




Sometime in the 23rd century…the survivors of war, overpopulation and pollution are living in a great domed city, sealed away from the forgotten world outside.
Here, in a seemingly perfect world, mankind lives only for pleasure.

There’s just one catch:

Life must end at thirty unless reborn in the fiery ritual of Carousel



spoiler alert



posted on May, 1 2009 @ 08:44 PM
link   
With a babe like Jenny Agutter I would most definitely run!

A protracted culling program would just be cruel. If you're going to cull, then do it in one fell swoop - like pulling a band-aid.

I would probably start with something like an economic collapse - to render most of the population insolvent and unable to defend themselves. Then introduce a pandemic....... wait a second..... OH DEAR GOD!



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join