It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lellomackin
He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a point that was high enough to prevent the people trapped above from escaping out the windows.
Originally posted by evil incarnate
reply to post by jd140
I would really love to see the entire context too but I am pretty sure that even if he says WTC, most of the people defending him will just have a new excuse for him so why even bother? They will say slip of the tounge, mistake, whatever.
Fox blatantly lies. I could care less if they take things out of context or cut them short of the facts that might change the meaning. They lie. Is this clip a lie? Please someone let us see the whole thing.
Of course in the meantime.....
I am still waiting for all the brains that are so sure he is NOT talking about the WTC to explain to me what they do think he is talking about. Why is everyone so fast to defend Bush, right up until someone actually corners them and asks them to explain fully how they could say such things.
Originally posted by jd140
If the people who posted this clip intentially left out key information that goes against what they are claiming then yes, this clip is a lie.
They would be doing the same thing that you hate Fox for.
How can you be so sure that he IS talking about the WTC? This speech was given in 2006. He could have been talking about a number of places. You want to see the whole thing, but it seems like you pretty much made up your mind about it already.
Originally posted by jd140
reply to post by evil incarnate
Whatever makes you sleep better at night. Personally I see it as the same thing.
I really don't care how you feel about Fox news.
I just want to see the whole speech.
Originally posted by Blueracer
Does anybody else feel that what he says here is taken out of context? Isn't he talking about what someone confessed to planning from interrogation but not what actually happened?
Even IF the government planted explosives, he wouldn't let it slip like this. No way.
Originally posted by News And History
We must resist (and arrest) terrorists in government by ourselves. The so-called, police do not follow our demands or dare to truly investigate of 9/11. They protect the criminals, who orchestrated those "terrorist attacks".
Originally posted by MrRandomGuy
He didn't "accidentally admit" anything. Cherry picking irrelevant inconsistencies proves nothing. You have to have harder evidence than that.