It's one of the MJ-12 documents. If you buy MJ-12, you might as well believe that one is genuine.

Well the MJ12 docs haven't been discredited to any reasonable level other than the date format on them,so if this is related than I buy it more.

Has anyone looked at the document that the OP linked to? Not very convincing - all caps and a hand drawn vehicle. OK......

Rather impressive doc
Whether genuine or not, thats another story
Could as well be the result of propaganda, a hoax or just true.
However we are used to documents that have plenty of blacked out areas and this isn't the case here.

That document was a sworn statement made by someone who reportedly had inside knowledge of this craft. Although it could be disinfo.

This aircraft looks a lot like the F-19 stealth.

At least the shape and the engine does. This document might be from the same program that never took shape.

Yea but the craft was reported to exist prior to 1945.

The craft drawn looks similar to the Testors version of the "F-19."

Though the air frame is a rather intuitive one - it just 'feels' like it would perform well at supersonic/hypersonic speeds (though low-speed lift would be questionable - I'm also not sure what placing the engines over the lifting body would do to the 'lifting-body' characteristics.... could be good, bad, and/or squirrely). So - the possibility of it being a coincidence is certainly there. Though the companies that make aviation models have some good heads with trained ears to the ground.

That said, this document was made in 1996 - well after the Testors model was on the market.

As far as the document itself - it's block type. It's used (especially in the days before the more accurate laser printers of today) for clarity - partial characters are more easy to identify when they are from the block type than in the lowercase lettering.

There are a few typos - but that could go either way towards credibility. If the document originated on a typewriter, someone wasn't as likely to redo their entire document to correct a double-hit on a character.

Details on the drive system are difficult to verify. I know of no way to utilize electromagnetism as a form of a drive (outside of a 'plasma jet' - but the best ones we have can't begin to compare with a standard jet engine). Theoretically you could 'play' off of the Earth's magnetic field... but that doesn't hold up in space, and the Earth's magnetic field is relatively weak.

The description of the electronics is shifty. It is hard to tell if the systems described were 'ET' in origin or something we devised. Either way - earliest possible development/testing would have been done (according to this document) about 1946-47. Solid State devices were just coming around - and the U.S. was still developing its "black arsenal" and would not have had near the access to before-market technologies (especially with regards to semiconductors).

That leaves vacuum tubes for processing... which I'm not very confident would have been used - they are very high power and not what one would call robust. I suppose some exotic form of computing could be used... but that's a whole new can of worms.

All in all... it sounds like what happens when you try and give a big-picture report on a compartmentalized program...... you put together data from the rumor-mill and end up with partial-truths that represent a real thing/event... but don't make sense when taken together, or have some rather large gaps in understanding.

Can someone check when the therm Fly By Wire was first used.