What Ever Happened To The Global Warming Myth?

Where did global warming go? It seems the media is completly avoiding this topic. Does that sound strange to you? It does to me. According to al gore we should all be dead by now from the perils of global warming. Personally im feeling a little cold.

Now can you see how easily the media controls you?

[edit on 29-4-2009 by SuperSlovak]

It's kind of hard to focus on something like global Warming with a time span of hundreds if not THOUSANDS of years when you have a pandemic which is HERE NOW. Nice try though.

A Macro-threat like Global Warming was not scaring people enough. Time to switch to a Micro-threat like a pandemic.

What is similar about both of these chaos vectors? Both of these threats, real or not, are beyond the capacity of any individual or small group of individuals to change.

reply to post by Ambient Sound

A Macro-threat like Global Warming was not scaring people enough. Time to switch to a Micro-threat like a pandemic.

The government always controls people with FEAR, their greatest weapon. Of course, they have the MSM as its accomplice to spread the fear. When people stop listening to the government and the MSM, only then will things change.
The old but true saying still holds:

The only time politicians lies is when they open their mouths.

Originally posted by SuperSlovak
Where did global warming go? It seems the media is completly avoiding this topic. Does that sound strange to you? It does to me. According to al gore we should all be dead by now from the perils of global warming. Personally im feeling a little cold.

Now can you see how easily the media controls you?

[edit on 29-4-2009 by SuperSlovak]

Global Warming isn't a linear increase in temperature, it's a gradual increase of the average temperature over a period of time. We may have a cold year this year, but next year may be extremely warm. The result would be an average increase of temperature.

As for the media, it's one of those things that's been beaten to death. There's nothing new to say. If there was, they'd report it.

The only question in my mind is whether humans contribute significantly to global warming, or if its due to natural cycles. Regardless, reducing emissions is good for the environment anyway, so we might as well do it.

It's been busy collapsing an ice shelf the size of New York in Antarctica.

First of all, global warming does not necessarily mean, warming of the earth alone, it is also the alteration of the nautral cycles and balance of the climate. So, it makes the existing weather more severe in some cases, and the recent cold wave in the US can be considered as a effect of global warming induced el-nino, the intensity of which was increased.

Edit:To add.

The media is not airing any news on this topic currently because of the swine flu, so a calm wait until things clear will help.

[edit on April 29th, 2009 by peacejet]

It's usually a case of keeping people's attention with one hand, while the other hand does something else.

[edit on 29-4-2009 by Horus12]

It was all a magician's trick to divert your attention from the money you were holding in your hand.

See? While you were looking at Global warming, I TOOK THE MONEY FROM YOUR HAND HAHA!

And btw, Antarctica is growing, don't dare ask about the North Pole's ice caps- it's not for your eyes, and it was a cold winter and spring... but so what? We took your money and you can't do anything about it! Hehehe!

All the money that could have been squeezed out of 'Global warming' has been extracted and the next scam is the manbirdpig flu itself.

MSM won't admit error and say they were helping bilk taxpayers out of their hard earned money to the Carbon Tax Fund and its directors, the Rothschilds. It is a fund you're not allowed to know anything about it because... Well, it's our money now and you can't do anything about it now hahaha...

Al Gore thanks all for the money that has made him a very rich man with mansions and cars and fancy food, now, get sick from the engineered virus and die... Eventually.

Thanks!

I understand why people feel global warming is exagerated or made up because it does seem that certain people are attempting to capitalize on this issue financially and politically. However, when 1,000's of scientists that study a subject all agree - with very few exceptions - that this is real, why doubt it so much?

We have learned so much from science, why the fear of knowledge?

reply to post by finemanm

However, when 1,000's of scientists that study a subject all agree - with very few exceptions - that this is real, why doubt it so much?

I posted answers to that very appropriate question on many threads before, but let me repeat my answer.

First of all, science is not, thankfully, advanced by democratic vote. In fact, in most cases, it is the maverick that breaks through prevailing thought with radical ideas that wins the day.

People like Galileo were of course, in a very small minority, when they made breakthrough discoveries. It takes courage and imagination to think what others refused to imagine.

In today's environment, unfortunately, grants are, in many cases, the do-or-die factor in research. Fail to get a grant, and you probably will not be able to proceed. As a professor, I saw very clearly how grants were awarded. Organizations that award such grants are quick to give grants to those who will favor their stand, and deny such grants to those who challenge their beliefs. The scientist can be the most political animal on earth. Having been on many committees, I can tell you that politics, unfortunately, are a prime factor in determining awards and grants.

Very few scientists have sufficient depth of knowledge to advance a credible hypothesis regarding global change, but of course, that does not stop them from signing meaningless petitions claiming to support one idea or the other. Those petitions are, for the most part, a sham, with the vast majority of the signers, truly ignorant of the basis for such theories. In fact, in most cases, those "scientists" are signing support to theories far outside of their area of expertise.

edited for typo

[edit on 29-4-2009 by ProfEmeritus]

"Global warming" wasn't working out so well, so they changed it to "climate change."

New look, same great BS!


TA

There really is nothing we can do to stop the so called warming of the planet. you can be as good as you want to be but the other guy will still drive his gas guzzling s.u.v. to work so whats the point

reply to post by ProfEmeritus


You say they do not have sufficient knowledge, but where do you get the idea that you have enough to doubt any form of scientific consensus? Of course it isnt democratic, do you grab a group of peers to see if the pen you throw off the table will drop to the floor? No, you try hard.

You have no reason to doubt anything scientific except an apparently overwhelming urge to defy as much of anything that you can.

Originally posted by alittler
reply to post by ProfEmeritus

 

You say they do not have sufficient knowledge, but where do you get the idea that you have enough to doubt any form of scientific consensus? Of course it isnt democratic, do you grab a group of peers to see if the pen you throw off the table will drop to the floor? No, you try hard.

You have no reason to doubt anything scientific except an apparently overwhelming urge to defy as much of anything that you can.

Just so you know there are scientists that argue against global warming they just don't get the press or the money. Antarctica is in fact expanding contrary to popular belief had the coldest year on record as a matter of fact.This is not the 1st time the northern hemisphere heated up the vikings used to grow grapes in Greenland. And this was long before industrialization so i really doubt we had anything to do with it this is natural fluctuation of our environment.

Originally posted by TheAssociate
"Global warming" wasn't working out so well, so they changed it to "climate change."

Let me correct you.

Global warming and climate change are not same. They are entirely different.

So, the fact is,

Global warming causes climate change.

Please get the facts right before you say anything.


[edit on April 30th, 2009 by peacejet]

From Wikipedia
"Dating of the Little Ice Age
There is no agreed beginning year to the Little Ice Age, although there is a frequently referenced series of events preceding the known climatic minima. Starting in the 13th century, pack ice began advancing southwards in the North Atlantic, as did glaciers in Greenland. The three years of torrential rains beginning in 1315 ushered in an era of unpredictable weather in Northern Europe which did not lift until the 19th century. There is anecdotal evidence of expanding glaciers almost worldwide. In contrast, a climate reconstruction based on glacial length[12] shows no great variation from 1600 to 1850, though it shows strong retreat thereafter."

Just so you understand that this didn't just happen for no reason.
Something happened to precipitate this.
Something happened in about the year 1258.
year 1258

As to our alleged global warming...it would be easier to understand that this could be caused by the sun beating down on acre upon acre of pavement and solid buildings than to any carbon in the atmosphere.
After all don't plants use carbon dioxide? They should all be growing like out of control weeds if that were true.

Anyone who subscribes to the kill shot/solar flare in 2012 believes in global warming.
For anyone not familiar-/ Jose Arquelles and various remote viewers and precogs
forecast a kill shot/ultimate solar flare in 2012.
It's global warming as instant stratification.
As in you will have to live below geological strata to survive.
This is all according to theories mostly promulgated thru George Noory @ Coasttocoast.

The Al Gore global warming is incremental-a relatively slow gradual process taking decades.
Hard for those with a fast-food, instant gratification philosophy to discern.
Polar bears believe in it.

Well considering that Antarctica is piling on better than 5 feet of ice per year and there area 850,000 square kilometers more sea ice than normal...and we haven't had a sun spot in nearly 2 years, I'd say they are trying to figure out how to go from telling us the earth is warming to breaking the news that the annual planting zones are all going to shift south one zone in the next 25 years and we'll likely all starve to death without looking like the lying opportunist they are.

CO2 rise was the result of the warming trend called deglaciation. That, by the way, ended as of 1998. NASA and Goddard cooked their books to match their prediction. Their funding was on the line.

Try Google for some interesting reads on the "Dalton Minimum"

Jokingly enough, astrophysicists are calling this the Gore Minimum. Yeah, its the longest solar minimum in 160 years. No sun spots mean no magnetic shield for earth meaning all radiation from the sun gets through, builds water vapor and cloud cover until it begins to lower global temperatures. Tada! Another Little Ice Age right on schedule.

reply to post by SuperSlovak


Global warming is not a myth. The cause being a man made problem is the myth. The earth has cycles of freezing and thawing. At least that’s what science always taught.