posted on Apr, 29 2009 @ 05:47 AM
I am new here and posted this thread in the wrong forum...so I have placed it here for a better response.
On the first moon landing made by the Apollo 11 crew, a big venture into the unknown, did they take any weapons with them.? and what where they.?
considering the low gravity Lunar environment.
They had no real idea if life was still thriving on the moon and how advanced this could be...I suppose the crew was classed as expendable, but it
still seems unwise to sacrifice such skilled and brave men, who would be the most important witnesses and carriers of vital information if the life
forms were hostile.
If the pictures from this `walkabout` have been censored and domes, craft etc. existed in the background and radio code words had been created for
such an event, I would have thought that some prior knowledge of these structures existed and provisions would have been made incase of
It seems strange to go on a venture like this with no means of defence especially when you do not know what you are going to find...voyages of
discovery by ship, on our own planet carried weapons to impress the natives.
Does this mean that no obvious structures exist on the lunar surface.? so theories of picture tampering are untrue.
...if they do, and was known about, why the conclusion that nothing existed there now.? inside
...the sightings of UFO`s flying above the surface must have been of no concern and had explanations, as for being perched on the edge of a
...if no technology of the earth could be used successfully, does this mean that no advanced technologies had been left here by visitors.? and that
the non-use on later missions, that nothing could have been left here by 1972.?
There seems to be a lot of astronaut accounts of strange things occuring above or on the moon, radio discussions and pics/vids...most of it on this
site...does this mean that this kind of stuff should be dismissed as `spaced out craziness`.?
It seems then that the evidence for lunar`smoking gun`accounts and advanced technologies, can be debunked by the lack of a smoking gun.