posted on May, 27 2009 @ 04:33 PM
Originally posted by starfemme1
reply to post by free_spirit
from the article in question:
(Update: A reader has just emailed us to inform us that proof exists to suggest that the original video might well be CGI, wich doesnt bode well for
this second image. We are investigating)
The ability to admit one made a mistake and humility-something you should learn and the mark of genuine UFO investigation.
I am a collaborator? right so what are you then. Hardly the comment of a genuine researcher! You can attack but anyone who defends is 'in on
it'-thats like me saying you are a competing interest-which I wouldnt suggest......................so why accuse me?
[edit on 18-5-2009 by starfemme1]
Your response was posted on May 18, 2009, check the date. This same day your
favorite psychic Michael Cohen is posting a new article claiming this: Germany:
Second witness to Paderborn UFO surfaces. It's funny, he is determined to sustain
this fake incident despite what you say he admitted to make a mistake. Your psychic
has admitted nothing and keeps with the same tale inventing a second witness.
It's clear as water.
You say you are his colaborator? Well starfemme it seems to me your psychic just
ignored your advice again and insist in the Paderborn tale even that it was debunked
with facts. What are you going to say now. And I'm not accusing you, I'm just showing
facts. Check the “new second witness” article and let's see if he tries to remove it.
By the way where is the email, the name or whereabouts of this alleged second witness your
psychic is claiming got in contact with him. He didn't show anything, it's just his words.
[edit on 27-5-2009 by free_spirit]