Mandatory Community Service at Iowa Highschool, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 27-4-2009 @ 07:42 PM by Hypntick
reply to post by LiquidLight



There is a ton of difference between a parent forcing their child to do chores and a public school system or government forcing a child to do community service.

If you are unable to see the difference in that, then we'll have to agree we have totally different world views and leave it at that.

A parent has the right to have their child do chores or do community service or go to school or whatever the case may be (within the bounds of the law of course). However a public school system or government has no right to do these things, especially in the United States. I don't care if doing so teaches these kids the best values in the world or teaches them to kill their fellow man, it's forced servitude any way you slice it.

[edit on 4/27/09 by Hypntick]


reply posted on 27-4-2009 @ 07:43 PM by Hypntick
reply to post by LiquidLight



Well i'm glad we agree that important choices should be on the parent and not the child. It also shouldn't be on the school system or government, they're no more well informed than a single child is.



reply posted on 27-4-2009 @ 07:49 PM by SpacePunk
reply to post by LiquidLight



The kids receive from their parents a roof, food, clothing, etc...

It's evident that either you are confused, or you see the government as parent and/or family.

You are comparing apples, and oranges. [SNIP]

Mod Edit: Reaffirming productive political debate.



[edit on 18-8-2009 by Gemwolf]


reply posted on 27-4-2009 @ 07:50 PM by LiquidLight
Originally posted by Hypntick
reply to
post by LiquidLight



There is a ton of difference between a parent forcing their child to do chores and a public school system or government forcing a child to do community service.

If you are unable to see the difference in that, then we'll have to agree we have totally different world views and leave it at that.

A parent has the right to have their child do chores or do community service or go to school or whatever the case may be (within the bounce of the law of course). However a public school system or government has no right to do these things, especially in the United States. I don't care if doing so teaches these kids the best values in the world or teaches them to kill their fellow man, it's forced servitude any way you slice it.


When we drop our kids off at school for the day, we temporarily give the school the right to do as they see fit for the welfare of the child (within limits, of course). It's not like parents don't have a say in this stuff; I don't think community service is mandated by the state or federal government. Parents can help change the way the school works through the PTA and school board elections.

Any parent that disagrees has the option of either sending their child to a private school or homeschooling (an option more and more families are taking now-a-days).

By sending your child to school, you're saying that you as a parent agree with the educational policies of said school.


reply posted on 27-4-2009 @ 10:25 PM by DrMattMaddix
reply to post by ghbost



Yes. In upper midwest my daughter has "Service Learning Day" coming up.

It could be misconstrued; but she likes it... Last year she helped fill a volley ball pit with sand and they all had a blast and the sand in her hair to prove it.

I don't believe they would cut off her hands (ie Shea Law) if she called in 'sick' that day.


reply posted on 28-4-2009 @ 12:53 AM by drwizardphd
Originally posted by tinfoilman

It doesn't matter if it's just 40 hours. The question is do they have the right in the first place to force you to do something just because they say so?

It's just like saying, it's ok, I only have my slaves pick a little cotton everyday so it's no big deal. It's not like they have to pick a lot of cotton right? Either way your forcing labor on someone.



Ok, there are a few common misconceptions that I guess need to be cleared up:

1. No one's forcing anyone to do anything. Community service is simply a requirement to graduate, in the same way that student's have to take their normal classes. It's like saying that being "forced" to have PE, 3 maths, 4 englishes and 3 sciences is "slavery".

2. Community service is hardly "labor". When we did community service, we were given the option to choose however we wanted to help out to earn our hours, so we got to make a difference in a way that we cared about. Some people volunteered at shelters, some at the humane society, etc. I participated in food drives and fundraisers where I distributed bags, came back a week later to collect, and then helped sort the food to be distributed to the community's less fortunate. If you equate that with picking cotton, then you have some issues with reasoning.


And if you REALLY didn't want your kid to be doing any service at all, you could just sign a sheet of paper saying s/he did the 40 hours and be done with it (I guess if you really hate your community). I can't begin to understand why you wouldn't want your child to learn to give back and help out the less fortunate, but I guess to each his own.


reply posted on 28-4-2009 @ 06:30 PM by tinfoilman
Originally posted by drwizardphd
Originally posted by tinfoilman

It doesn't matter if it's just 40 hours. The question is do they have the right in the first place to force you to do something just because they say so?

It's just like saying, it's ok, I only have my slaves pick a little cotton everyday so it's no big deal. It's not like they have to pick a lot of cotton right? Either way your forcing labor on someone.



Ok, there are a few common misconceptions that I guess need to be cleared up:

1. No one's forcing anyone to do anything. Community service is simply a requirement to graduate, in the same way that student's have to take their normal classes. It's like saying that being "forced" to have PE, 3 maths, 4 englishes and 3 sciences is "slavery".

2. Community service is hardly "labor". When we did community service, we were given the option to choose however we wanted to help out to earn our hours, so we got to make a difference in a way that we cared about. Some people volunteered at shelters, some at the humane society, etc. I participated in food drives and fundraisers where I distributed bags, came back a week later to collect, and then helped sort the food to be distributed to the community's less fortunate. If you equate that with picking cotton, then you have some issues with reasoning.


And if you REALLY didn't want your kid to be doing any service at all, you could just sign a sheet of paper saying s/he did the 40 hours and be done with it (I guess if you really hate your community). I can't begin to understand why you wouldn't want your child to learn to give back and help out the less fortunate, but I guess to each his own.


I'm sorry, my community has never done anything for me without expecting that almighty tax dollar or that I sign that almighty check. When people start doing stuff for me for free, then I'll teach my kids to do something for free. Until then, if you want work from this family, you'll sign over that almighty check to us. If our labor isn't good enough to pay us for it then it must not mean that much to you right? So, what does it matter if we don't do it?

I want my kids to learn one thing and that's nothing is free. Stop being cheap and get that check book out. If not, I'll just stay home if that's ok with you?

As for regular classes being slavery. Well, I've already covered that in a previous post.
[edit on 28-4-2009 by tinfoilman]

[edit on 28-4-2009 by tinfoilman]


reply posted on 25-6-2009 @ 12:18 PM by bloodWolf762
reply to post by LiquidLight



Do you feed, clothe, and provide the necessities for your children? Then the chores you would have them do around the house are not the same thing as mandatory community service. They work around the house and they receive goods and services for that work.
MANDATORY community service is FORCED labor. You can say it's for their own good and that they're learning to help others (which is undoubtedly a good thing), but that doesn't change what it is. Most, if not all of them, are not there to help, they are there because some asshole is holding their diploma hostage, isn't that extortion? So what are they really learning? That if they have the leverage, they can exploit others to do what they would not do themselves. School is about becoming educated in the arts and sciences, instilling ethics is for the family.


As a side note, with all the emphasis on community service and the give act, i can't help but wonder if this is an attempt to ease the public into a new draft (this is still a conspiracy site damn it). With our troops stretched thin, enlistment low, and recent developments with Iran and North Korea, it wouldn't be far to make that leap.

[edit on 25-6-2009 by bloodWolf762]
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



A MUST Read, "Written By A Female Cop"
  Posted 2 days ago with 33 member flags
Know your enemy ... the Daily Mail & Viscount Rothermere
  Posted 11 days ago with 17 member flags
Pictures That Shocked The World (viewer discretion advised)
  Posted 0 days ago with 8 member flags
NBC and the Banned \'Fear Factor\' Episode
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags