CONS: Exposing The Fraud of the "No Plane Theory" -- Conspiracy Fakery, page 6

. . .an interesting two part discussion between sound engineer Ace Baker (another NPT advocate) . . .

That guy is who got me into making 911 videos. He is very annoying to watch and he attacks people for supposedly making fake videos. The stuff he uses for making horrible accusations against people are things that can be easily disproved. Too bad no one has ever sued him.
No planers, if I am allowed to call them that, seem to have rather caustic personalities. They will make full use of their abilities of deleting any negative comments posted on their videos. By negative, I mean making statements of facts that go against their so-called evidence. When people delete them, or ban them, they like to complain about censorship. They do not detect any hypocrisy in their own actions, whenever they have any tiny bit of power. My way of getting back at people like Simon Shack is to make my own videos. I never delete any comments of people ridiculing my videos. I am always happy to discuss actual facts and have been given some good advice from time to time. Now there are others who do not want to hear actual facts.
Let's say someone makes a video that says, "Here is evidence that these videos were really made by a computer making composites. You can see this building that keeps moving. It is doing that because they goofed up or something." Just ridiculous because I happened to be looking at the same video and using Photos to work out different angles and had run across the same phenomenon. It happens because when you use a telephoto lens, and are looking at distant objects, it flattens everything out. So, you have a bunch of buildings piled up on each other and you think they are somehow all close together. If you take the trouble to actually identify the buildings and locate them geographically, you can see why they seem to behave the way they do, on the video. Instead of being next door, one is a mile and a half away. When you move the camera thirty feet one way or another, perpendicular to the the direction the camera is pointing, the closer building changes its position, relative to the further away buildings, a lot more than the ones that are more local to what your target is.
So I write all this stuff out and post it on this crazy video. The owner of the video messages me and says, "I am giving you ten minutes to prove what you are saying or I will delete your comments." I message him back with all the technical stuff and then he deletes it, anyway.
This is rather lengthy and may be a little personal, but this is my experience with one of the main actors in this theory. The guy says, "I have to protect my research". What research? When confronted by real research, they have to hide behind something. In this case, a video with all kinds of comments from sycophants telling him how great he is.

[edit on 27-4-2009 by jmdewey60]