CONS: Exposing The Fraud of the "No Plane Theory" -- Conspiracy Fakery

page: 12
105
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join

posted on Feb, 8 2010 @ 01:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by Nola213

South side explosion, dodgy on you tube, but in your screen cap, clearly a seperate event as its a fireball, some 25-30 stories below the impact. Again thanks for clearing that up better as well.




Stairwells exist.
Also, can you imagine what would happen when that jet fuel hit the gas lines and then main? Catastrophic. I do not find it far fetched that the plane plus the gas lines brought down the plane. Like said above, they were selling an idea. I do that every day. Promise everything and deliver half if best on most occasions. You can never know what is in the future and the architects probably banked on noone crashing into the towers. I would have.

[edit on 8-2-2010 by A-E-I-Owned-You]




posted on Dec, 28 2010 @ 10:35 AM
link   
For all the archival video that should be available for nose in nose out and
plane video fakery stances I have never seen the broadcast video of the
man that said he saw the first plane avoid the Empire State building.

Right there crumbles any theory except for someone wanting to be on camera.
I mean there is no mistake there, from Empire State Building to the World
Trade Center just can not be questioned as an absolute fact.



posted on Dec, 30 2010 @ 08:14 AM
link   
That theory is easily debunked once you realize that private footage showing the same thing exists.



posted on Jan, 7 2011 @ 01:38 AM
link   



posted on Jan, 10 2011 @ 08:20 AM
link   
What exactly is OPs point here?
I didn't see any conclusions of his higher quality picture analysis except that the "later drawn in plane/wing hole theory" might be flawed.

I am somewhat a proponent of NPT in that way that I have to admit: I cannot tell if there were planes impacting the towers in reality. But that's besides the point....
The main merit of this theory is not that or if the planes are fake but rather general Video editing/forgery.

I cannot and will never accept the random appearance of weird faces inside the fireballs and dust clouds shown in some of the videos!1



posted on Jan, 10 2011 @ 09:55 AM
link   
reply to post by mister.old.school
 


solid work OP! few points!

-not every may be able to spend $200 for access to the high resolution DVD. Props to you for buyin it though.

-Im impressed by all the work you did HOWEVER why did you do it on this topic and basically slamming one person? Why didnt you put all this work towards a more credible theory, than the one that everyone knows is wrong.



posted on Jan, 10 2011 @ 03:28 PM
link   
reply to post by kybertech
 

I cannot and will never accept the random appearance of weird faces inside the fireballs and dust clouds shown in some of the videos!1

I made a nice little video quite a while back about faces in the fire ball, how if it did not exist, they would make some way of having a face anyway, just to freak people out.

In case anyone is having a problem understanding the point of this video:
In the studio, they did one of these little pixelated momentarily freezes when they show the news anchors, to make it look like maybe there were incompetent technicians working overtime and too tired to do things right, then they do a rewind but instead of it being off-screen, they actually show what we are supposed to think is them rewinding a tape. Then after they show the video a second time, they decide to rewind it again and play it a third time. Again they show the rewind, only thing is, what is the chance that the second rewind is exactly the same as the first rewind? None, of course, but it's not a real rewind, it's some sort of manufactured simulation of a rewind, designed to show something scary.

edit on 10-1-2011 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 09:14 PM
link   
Talk about fools arguing among themselves, is it any wonder the world is in the state it is? At this rate we will all go down in flames with our hands around each other's throats. The correct date is not 9/11, it is 9/11/2001, nigh on ten years ago. Maybe some of you need to come back to the future because this is where its all going down.



posted on Jun, 11 2011 @ 09:38 PM
link   
Good for bringing this up. Like I said, with all the venues, p2p, download sites somebody should be able to upload a clip of explosions taking place with the planes missing, if it was indeed CGI. However thats not the case and so far I dont know of anybody who can show that holografic technology to display objects like airliners in that fashion existed.






top topics



 
105
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join