It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by trey85
ue, I do definely believe there is some higher power not of this world behind the "power elite".It seems virtually impossible that a group of normal man grouped together 13 or so (whatever the number might be)certain bloodlines thousands of years ago,and decided to band together and take over the world.
Originally posted by WClint
Not really. Wwho is behind the NWO its the one group you simply can not name (think about it), they call themselves the tribe. Its in there genetics... essentially its the Jews. They believe that "collectively they are god".
Originally posted by 52Telecaster
These theories are backed by the idea that because scientists do not know what 98% of our DNA does, it must be reptillian.
Originally posted by trey85
If the Summerian tablet interpretation is right ,that means the Anunnaki created man as a slave race.At which point then did they lose control of us? Granted the "power elite" do have total control of us, but they dont have there "New World Order/Global government". Why would they have to build towards this goal if they had it at day 1.I also havent managed to piece together if this Anunnaki is the same race that David Icke talks about today,and if there innerdimenional beings ,aliens from another planet,or both.Regardless how much of this is true, I do definely believe there is some higher power not of this world behind the "power elite".It seems virtually impossible that a group of normal man grouped together 13 or so (whatever the number might be)certain bloodlines thousands of years ago,and decided to band together and take over the world.So if anyone has he answers on this, are different outlooks please respond.If not reptellians then what is behind the "shadow government"I will also ask please no (satans behind it all comments)I have nothing against christians(everyone i know is one) but this thread is not about satan and asking thousands of questions about the bible,and all that makes to sense in it.I would like to hear different interpretation of the summerian tablet bible connection for or against .
Originally posted by trey85
If the Summerian tablet interpretation is right ,that means the Anunnaki created man as a slave race...
Originally posted by internos
reply to post by trey85
The problem with the cocktails is that you never know the final result of the mix: i deeply respect Zecharia Sitchin as a researcher on sumerians, but he should do the same with specialists in astronomy: and he does NOT.
His claims about Nibiru, based upon some PERSONAL interpretation of VA 243 are an offence to the intelligence of all us. The story of Nibiru is an internet hoax, and even not the first attempt, and even from the SAME source, which is not sitchin. And don't think that we are safe, because we are not. Human race is evil and stupid enough to self-destroy, so there's no need to wait for Nibiru to watch the spectacle: just look what happened on 9/11, or what we did to Iraq for NO reasons: this world does NOT need Nibiru to end, trust me.
watch.
Since i don't want to get boring, i will tell this to you and once for all: NOTHING will happen on 2012. Sitchin claimed that the planet Nibiru is orbiting the Sun every 3600 years: it is written on his book "The Twelfth Planet". But that was NOT the issue. The problems started when Nancy Lieder, basing on her asinine knowledge on astronomy her theories, started running Zetatalk: ah, by the way, she predicted the end of the world for 2003, but since i am here, alive, and talking to you, i'd say it's safe to state that she was WRONG. After 2012, she will predict the end of the world for 2018 and so on. She will stop predicting only when she will stop selling books, or when she will die. Back to Sitchin, i have to say that he's the only dude that claims this: ALL the people who actually work on translations coming from mesopotamia agree on the contrary: the story of this planet comes from nowhere. Sumerians were a great people, extremely well organized, but their knowledge in astronomy was very but very limited: sitchin assumes the contrary, but does NOT prove it. For example, there are NO PROOFS that sumerians knew about the existence of Pluto, Uranus or Neptune: basically, we should accept the theory that they didn't know about planets actually orbiting around our Sun, but at the same time they knew about this very strange planet that orbits around us with the purpose of striking us on 2012.
This is not science: this is sci-fi.
I will pose a question to you now: would you put the future of your sons in the hands of people like that?
Nothing will happen on 2012, reptilian shapeshifters exist only in youtube lossy compressed videos, there are no proof that we are being visited by aliens and who claim the contrary either is lying or wants to sell you a book
And my hint is foor free: you decide what way to choose
Originally posted by downunderET
I think that Sitchin is "close" to the truth, and coupled with Lloyd Pye' theories, then something is a miss here about who we are.
Originally posted by downunderET
I feel that the bible is bending the truth a little and also that the vatican is "holding back" on a number of matters.