It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ngchunter
reply to post by letthereaderunderstand
If those white dots are some sort of "backdrop support," why do they cut through the astronaut's helmet in the image? Also, if they used a "backdrop," why do apollo images taken kilometers apart on the moon show the expected parallax and therefore produce 3d images when viewed as cross-eye stereo images?
i14.photobucket.com...
Lastly, why did you fail to mention that the press conference took place after a three week quarantine where Neil was forced to spend his birthday, or the fact that Neil Armstrong is always stoic and reclusive? Here's a guy who wasn't even phased by nearly being killed in an LLTV accident and just kept working that very day.
Originally posted by letthereaderunderstand
I propose the white dots are clouds.
I placed a green line as a marker for the support truss as an example of what is seen in the reflection through to pieces of visor, first a clear pain then a reflective pain. Also notice the faint blue that surround the clouds and the orange hue of the sun.
In the stereo image, why is the left image blurred and altered?
It is clearly the same scene, also how did they get that image before they had landed as seen in the right image?
As for Neil Armstrong. It is good to know that info. I was unaware of that, but I still believe his dazed character is for other reasons.
Originally posted by pluckynoonez
The evidence is also the camera on their chests. There is no way they could manipulate them with their bulky fingers. No way.
history.nasa.gov...
Modifications to the cameras included special large locks for the film magazines and levers on the f-stop and distance settings on the lenses. These modifications facilitated the camera's use by the crew operating with pressurized suits and gloves. Additionally, the cameras had no reflex mirror viewfinder and instead a simple sighting ring assisted the astronaut in pointing the camera.
Originally posted by pluckynoonez
The evidence is also the camera on their chests. There is no way they could manipulate them with their bulky fingers. No way.
Originally posted by letthereaderunderstand
reply to post by ngchunter
Ok, here is the picture you just posted laid one over the other. How are these from different angles?
Originally posted by Komodonot only this .. but who's taking the side shot with the camera? Didn't think they had a hand held....only the ones on their chests. Noticed as well the steadiness of the side shot. I'd like to see a comparison of the chest on the drivers suit to the one of the passenger side hand held.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
serious question
if you honestly believe that the US faked the moon missions, why not go visit the good people at mcdonald observatory in Texas ? They claim they have never gotten a visitor who challenges the apollo missions. They could show you the lunar laser ranging station, and it's significance to this debate
make history !
unless, of course, you are just bored and looking to kill time on the web...