Photographic evidence that at least one moon mission is fake!!, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 24-4-2009 @ 02:07 PM by ngchunter
reply to post by letthereaderunderstand



If those white dots are some sort of "backdrop support," why do they cut through the astronaut's helmet in the image? Also, if they used a "backdrop," why do apollo images taken kilometers apart on the moon show the expected parallax and therefore produce 3d images when viewed as cross-eye stereo images?
i14.photobucket.com...
Lastly, why did you fail to mention that the press conference took place after a three week quarantine where Neil was forced to spend his birthday, or the fact that Neil Armstrong is always stoic and reclusive? Here's a guy who wasn't even phased by nearly being killed in an LLTV accident and just kept working that very day.


reply posted on 24-4-2009 @ 02:20 PM by letthereaderunderstand
Originally posted by ngchunter
reply to
post by letthereaderunderstand



If those white dots are some sort of "backdrop support," why do they cut through the astronaut's helmet in the image? Also, if they used a "backdrop," why do apollo images taken kilometers apart on the moon show the expected parallax and therefore produce 3d images when viewed as cross-eye stereo images?
i14.photobucket.com...
Lastly, why did you fail to mention that the press conference took place after a three week quarantine where Neil was forced to spend his birthday, or the fact that Neil Armstrong is always stoic and reclusive? Here's a guy who wasn't even phased by nearly being killed in an LLTV accident and just kept working that very day.


I propose the white dots are clouds. I placed a green line as a marker for the support truss as an example of what is seen in the reflection through to pieces of visor, first a clear pain then a reflective pain. Also notice the faint blue that surround the clouds and the orange hue of the sun.

In the stereo image, why is the left image blurred and altered? It is clearly the same scene, also how did they get that image before they had landed as seen in the right image?

As for Neil Armstrong. It is good to know that info. I was unaware of that, but I still believe his dazed character is for other reasons.

Peace



reply posted on 24-4-2009 @ 02:28 PM by ngchunter
Originally posted by letthereaderunderstand
I propose the white dots are clouds.

...they cut through the astronaut's helmet, they're not clouds. I get similar lines on some of my astronomy cameras at the edges, proves nothing.

I placed a green line as a marker for the support truss as an example of what is seen in the reflection through to pieces of visor, first a clear pain then a reflective pain. Also notice the faint blue that surround the clouds and the orange hue of the sun.

I see glare of the lunar surface reflecting off a helmet, that's all, sorry.

In the stereo image, why is the left image blurred and altered?

Because I pulled it directly from one of your own conspiracy sites, they have a bad habit of doing that to images. I then rotated it to match the angle of the other picture.

It is clearly the same scene, also how did they get that image before they had landed as seen in the right image?

LOL, clearly the same scene?
A)There's massive parallax causing the mountains to be 3d, proving they were taken kilometers apart
B)The rocks in the foreground are all different. This because the left picture was taken after they had driven in the rover several kilometers to a new station where they took this picture. It was taken a long time AFTER they landed.

As for Neil Armstrong. It is good to know that info. I was unaware of that, but I still believe his dazed character is for other reasons.

Considering how closed you to the other clear-cut issues, I'm not surprised. Just thought I'd let the truth out there.

[edit on 24-4-2009 by ngchunter]


reply posted on 24-4-2009 @ 02:51 PM by Phage
reply to post by Komodo



The chest mounted cameras were 70mm Hasselblad still cameras. They were modified for use on the Moon.
Modifications to the cameras included special large locks for the film magazines and levers on the f-stop and distance settings on the lenses. These modifications facilitated the camera's use by the crew operating with pressurized suits and gloves. Additionally, the cameras had no reflex mirror viewfinder and instead a simple sighting ring assisted the astronaut in pointing the camera.
history.nasa.gov...

The movie camera was a 16mm which was mounted on the LRV.



[edit on 4/24/2009 by Phage]


reply posted on 24-4-2009 @ 02:56 PM by letthereaderunderstand
reply to post by ngchunter



Ok, here is the picture you just posted laid one over the other. How are these from different angles?




reply posted on 24-4-2009 @ 04:18 PM by ngchunter
Originally posted by letthereaderunderstand
reply to
post by ngchunter



Ok, here is the picture you just posted laid one over the other. How are these from different angles?

Did you bother to look at them as a cross-eye stereo image? Look at my first post again, cross your eyes until the images overlap and notice how the mountains are clearly 3 dimensional - that's because of the parallax. You can't tell it's there just by layering two images at 50% opacity. For those interested, the images we're talking about are known as:
AS15-82-11057
AS15-82-11082
Here's a gif animation to give a better perspective of the parallax, made using copies of the above images taken from ALSJ:
files.abovetopsecret.com...
*As my image is said to be headache-inducing due to its rapid motion, I turned it into a link instead. Click at your head's own expense.

[edit on 24-4-2009 by ngchunter]


reply posted on 24-4-2009 @ 04:24 PM by Phage
reply to post by ngchunter


Looking at the cross-eyed images gave me a headache.
You just made it worse.



reply posted on 24-4-2009 @ 06:06 PM by letthereaderunderstand
reply to post by ngchunter



I guess I'm confused because first of all, they are not the same image as seen from two different vantage points to render a "parallax". They have two different light patterns, are shot at two different times of two different scenes.

Wouldn't you want to use a marker to get a true parallax? Also, the depth of field is messed with in the left picture to distort it.

I understand what a stereo picture is, perhaps your other examples you listed will have a good representation. I haven't got to see them yet. thank you for posting them.

Peace


reply posted on 24-4-2009 @ 11:31 PM by letthereaderunderstand
Originally posted by syrinx high priest


serious question

if you honestly believe that the US faked the moon missions, why not go visit the good people at mcdonald observatory in Texas ? They claim they have never gotten a visitor who challenges the apollo missions. They could show you the lunar laser ranging station, and it's significance to this debate

make history !

unless, of course, you are just bored and looking to kill time on the web...


Seriously, no one has ever challenged them? Yes, they could show me a lot of things I'm sure, everything but the moon. Besides, I never said they didn't go to the moon, I'm providing evidence that what is shown the public is a publicity (For public consumption) stunt, and only one mission as that is all I have evidence for.

Does no one understand that the Apollo Missions ran almost the exact same length as Americas involvement in the Vietnam War? Does no one understand what both Eisenhower and JFK warned of? There is more than enough reason to lie to the public...Lots and Lots of money...Not aliens, not superiority in the space race. JFK had other plans like actually going to the moon, not Johnson or Nixon. But, they saw a cover and something that could wash all that money made by bell, and Northrop and Boeing and every other war profiteer as white as the moons surface.

Everyone forget the fact that the navigation computers were not as powerful as a watch computer from the 80's? The Van Allen radiation Belt?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Hubble\'s Hidden Treasures - Incredible views of the Universe
  Posted 17 days ago with 40 member flags
Mars curiosity Sol2 Anomalies
  Posted 11 days ago with 22 member flags
Curiosity Just Went Through Mud?
  Posted 0 days ago with 22 member flags
Mars: Fears Curiosity Will Contaminate Planet
  Posted 1 days ago with 21 member flags
Milky Way in detail.
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags
Went to the moon, we never went, was scared off, still going!?
  Posted 15 days ago with 11 member flags

ATS Live North America is broadcasting now.
Today's Show: ATS Live:161:Trees,Ghosts,Phantom 'Copters,Pshop,Teaching,Jail,Violence,MajorTom,Animals,