Waterboard Sean Hannity, Take Your Bets!, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times
Topic started on 24-4-2009 @ 12:03 AM by pluckynoonez
(Side-note: Charles Grodin is a rhetorical scholar/genius.) You get to Grodin's interview after Hannity blabs for a while...at 2:30 into this first video



And part 2



Hannity says he is for "enhanced interrogation" and will subject himself to waterboarding for charity. And, thus...

Olbermann Calls Hannity's Bluff: $1000 For Every Second Of Waterboarding (VIDEO)



www.huffingtonpost.com...

I say under 30 seconds. Sean Hannity will tap-out in under 30.


[edit on 24-4-2009 by pluckynoonez]


reply posted on 24-4-2009 @ 12:25 AM by pluckynoonez
reply to post by David9176



I believe he can make it 30 seconds because that is about average for humans holding their breath underwater. The bravado of Hannity in that situation will be tenuous, 30 seconds later he will be gasping for Dick Cheney to save him.


reply posted on 24-4-2009 @ 01:39 AM by pluckynoonez
Originally posted by neo67
what is wrong with you people???????????? seriously are you a bunch of hypocrits or what?


remember the left doesnt beleive in waterboarding its not a ok for a terrorists BUT ITS OK FOR SEAN HANNITY?????


you people on the left like to think your better than everyone else. how about time you actually show it.

and the responses in this thread IS NOT showing it.


You must be a "right-winger" because anyone who does not agree with you is a leftist. Well, let me tell you, I am for neither party, they are both crooked in their own special ways. So before you label me and other people on this thread as "the left" look at your own ilk (grammar-wise as well).

The term "terrorist/s" is meant to reduce human beings to nothing, less than human. It is a form of xenophobia. And it is scary. The same people who say "well, they say he's a terrorist so he has no rights" are the same people who call people from Mexico "illegals." (Check out Peter Boyles on DENVER AM radio, he can't shut up about it.) Where is your wretch-factor? I mean, are we talking about human beings or dead and diseased dogs on the side of the road? I find the such labeling of human beings to be disgusting.

So, waterboarding is a practice that is used frequently. Sean Hannity is shrugging his shoulders saying it is no big deal, and to get over it. Well, let's put some water where his mouth is and see how harmless the practice is.



[edit on 24-4-2009 by pluckynoonez]



reply posted on 24-4-2009 @ 01:59 AM by Jazzyguy
reply to post by neo67



Hey, hey, hey, it's just a harmless wager, come on, why take it oh so seriously. It's for charity, if he's man enough, he ought to do it don't you think?

I mean it's just waterboarding, it's like going to the water park for a tough guy like Hannity, what's the big deal? It'll be fun really. There's no need to call people hypocrites... heh, heh.

BESIDES, perhaps once Hannity shows that waterboarding is not torture and harmless (no permanent damage), people will agree with this enhanced interrogation technique. It's safe, Hannity has nothing to be afraid of.


reply posted on 24-4-2009 @ 02:09 AM by pluckynoonez
reply to post by neo67



"Right-winger" is a term coined from a book I read about some guy who tried to be rhetorically astute, yet revealed his leanings by the very language he used.

I dislike Republicans more than Democrats. It is their sex with young boys that bothers me. At least Democrats have sex with people their own age (or of legal age). So, yeah, my leanings should be apparent.

The truth remains, this whole issue, and how Republicans approach it, is purely from emotion. "Oh my Gord! the terrorists might kill my kids!" So you have people like Hannity and O'Reilly that romanticize the issue hoping the investigation will go away. I am more level-headed than that. Take Ellis Henican, he is a rhetorical scholar and genius himself. I have the biggest non-sexual crush on him, and he slam-dunks O'Reilly on this issue.




reply posted on 24-4-2009 @ 02:21 AM by neo67
Originally posted by pluckynoonez
reply to
post by neo67



"Right-winger" is a term coined from a book I read about some guy who tried to be rhetorically astute, yet revealed his leanings by the very language he used.

I dislike Republicans more than Democrats. It is their sex with young boys that bothers me. At least Democrats have sex with people their own age (or of legal age). So, yeah, my leanings should be apparent.

The truth remains, this whole issue, and how Republicans approach it, is purely from emotion. "Oh my Gord! the terrorists might kill my kids!" So you have people like Hannity and O'Reilly that romanticize the issue hoping the investigation will go away. I am more level-headed than that. Take Ellis Henican, he is a rhetorical scholar and genius himself. I have the biggest non-sexual crush on him, and he slam-dunks O'Reilly on this issue.








what did you do sit there and think of the most ridiculous thing you could think of in order to bait someone into a fight????????


sorry to dissapoint but the next contestant can fight with you


reply posted on 24-4-2009 @ 05:31 AM by weedwhacker
reply to post by pluckynoonez



Nice post, plucky....(pay no attention the nasty trolls....)

Heck, I don't have much, but I'd follow Keith Olbermann's example and pledge $5 per second, as long as it is televised!!!!! I'd gladly pay to see....oh....like 'Pay per View'! I get it!!!

*edit*....to the same charity....*end edit*

[edit on 4/24/0909 by weedwhacker]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^