It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
These vials were last accounted for in 2004, if not earlier.
They even think they might have been destroyed.
The three missing vials were among thousands of vials that were under the control of a senior scientist who retired in 2004. When another Fort Detrick scientist recently inventoried the retired scientist's biological samples, he discovered that the three vials of the virus were missing. The original scientist's records about his vials dated back to the days of paper-and-pen inventories. During the investigation, the retired scientist and another former Fort Detrick researcher cooperated with investigating agents and, according to Vander Linden, they came back to the facility to help look for the vials. Vander Linden said the investigators know that several years ago an entire freezer full of biological samples broke down and all the samples had to be safely destroyed. But a complete inventory of what was in the freezer was not done before the samples were destroyed. Vander Linden said there's a "strong possibility" the vials were in that freezer and destroyed, but that isn't known for sure.
So it's most likely not a recent disappearance.
Originally posted by Perfect stranger
reply to post by Gawdzilla
Gawdzilla
Not sure I follow your logic. what I'm thinking is that it may have been some kind of test or maybe even an attack. Do people bet on Polo? Who would have something to gain if these horses did not compete? You state correctly that horses that did not receive meds were ok... so why did only some get them and what was really in the Meds?
Food for thought........
But during visits to A&M biodefense labs, CDC inspectors found plenty of other things wrong, according to the Dallas Morning News. For instance: "Unauthorized workers with access to infectious diseases. Improper storage of dangerous agents and infected animals. And inadequate security plans, training procedures and record-keeping."
Originally posted by Perfect stranger
reply to post by Gawdzilla
OK, I follow what you are saying, but gievn we are in the General conspiracy page. I still find it strange that yesterday CNN actually had the links one on top of each other and didn't seem to see the link that I did.. Just saying it seems odd to me
Originally posted by Perfect stranger
reply to post by spinkyboo
Quite Scary
While I realize that some of these "Missing" items can be written of to "bad paperwork" One has to think that some of of these items may have fallen into the wrong hands. It is very often considered Standard Operating Procedure" to do a "dry run" of any plan prior to execution. This may not be as sinister as that but to me it really provokes thought as to who would have something to gain ?
Could that have been a test of a delivery method for something different?
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by spinkyboo
Googling keywords and grabbing random websites that date as far back as 2007 is no way to link these things together...
Come on, are you deliberately encouraging the fear mongering?