It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by blupblup
Originally posted by noonebutme
Originally posted by blupblup
reply to post by karl 12
Very true..... It literally is (the bible) the most disgustingly violent, sadistic, sexually depraved and morally abhorrent book on the market.
Phwoaar! You actually just made it sound 'appealing'! Might have to have a re-read with that in mind! Sounds deliciously salacious!
Hilarious mate.... i probably did make it sound like a rip-roaring read huh?
Enjoy it man....
For those who haven't heard yet: Legendary comics artist Robert Crumb has just come out with his new book: The Book of Genesis, Illustrated by R. Crumb, a magnum opus, five years in the making, telling the complete, unedited book of Genesis in graphic novel form.
Originally posted by Neo Christian Mystic
It gets even more interresting when youu learn that this Annas is heavily involved in the punnishment of Jesus
Originally posted by Nohup
What I always found interesting that Annas, father of the boy killed by Jesus as a child, shows up again in another text as the leader of the Temple elders who were responsible for getting Jesus tortured and crucified. A little payback, perhaps?
The books included in the Bible all tie together because they are all divinely inspired. We know this because what is predicted about and discussed in the Old Testament materializes in the New Testament. Every book is in perfect alignment with another and no contradictions exist... for those who actually understand the text.
[edit on 23-4-2009 by one_enlightened_mind]
Originally posted by karl 12
Originally posted by karl 12
Well thanks for sharing your opinion - to my mind the absolute opposite is true and the bible is positively littered with blatant contradictions,glaring inconsistencies,scientific inaccuracies and factual discrepencies.
Originally posted by blupblup
Good post.
And that's not even mentioning the "permitted" incest.. (lot and daughters, adam and eve et al.)
many, many contradictions and discrepancies.
Originally posted by gnosis111
reply to post by one_enlightened_mind
Who is it who deems these book divine inspired or not? Constantine? The Pope? Or any Christian who sees it fit.
It seems it is still "pick and choose", because it is MAN who has determined (picked and chose) which books are divine inspired.
In understanding this stuff one first removes atheist (none of it is true) and christian (only the bible and all of it is true) bias
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by gnosis111
Who is it who deems these book divine inspired or not? Constantine? The Pope? Or any Christian who sees it fit.
The best answer is a study of the Council of Nicea, seeing who it was comprised of, the reason for the meeting, and the result thereof. No-one wants to answer to God for botching up His word. This was a responsibility taken both seriously and carefully. All the best on the study and would be interested in hearing your conclusions from it.
Originally posted by octotom
First, I want to say something that I didn't quite see mentioned here. That being that no one deemed the biblical books inspired, rather they were inspired inherently, and it was up to men to discover, more or less, which ones were. That was the purpose of the Council of Nicea and, as an earlier poser stated, the participants in that council took their job very seriously.