Maybe this is my issue with this idea.
Does everyone here agree that 96% of this is speculation? Really, look at it, the amount of proof is very little.
1. Grainy video. We can all agree its tough to tell, I can't conclusively debunk the connection, though that proves nothing beyond the fact I
can't.
2. Rob was in New York at the time... one of the biggest cities on the planet. It's not like it's a backwater town or anything. Yes it puts him
there, proximity is something, but in this case it's a bit weak. ( Though something, i'll admit to that

)
3. Why is everyone who believes so adamant? You can still research and try to find the answer without blindly thinking it's Riggle. I never
understand the need to vehemently believe in something you're trying to solve. If you can't tell, I'm big on logic and the scientific method,
which obviously limits speculation. So to me, interjecting bias on that level is a disadvantage to your research. Though exploring a possible
connection is fine, it's just there isn't much to make of this.
4. I really think everyone is influencing each other. Doesn't that look/sound like him? This reinforcement isn't coming from new information,
it's building off of hearing others repeat back the same thing you think. It's invalid in a sense, the fact that others agree on something doesn't
mean it's any more likely to be true.
I'm not trying to be that guy in the thread telling everyone how to think or whatever, but I feel like this is getting off track. The Harley Guy is
an interesting case and I think we should be looking into it. But let's try to expand the focus outside of Riggle, there isn't much more we can
compare or test with him at the moment.
Oh, and nooooo way Riggle addresses this or hires a lawyer. There is not an ounce of credible evidence that any court would hear. That's just the
way the system works, no prosecutions are being handled here.