It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Nammu
Anyone in the local area willing to take Chuktah up on this?
Originally posted by Chucktah
reply to post by Pilot303
I would like to know how you think that these actions alone would put our soldiers into any more danger than they're already in? What is different now then 50 years ago? Why is it that just because the news is talking about waterboarding now, that our soldiers are at any greater risk then before? Is it because before, our enemies had morals? Or is it because that it is an easy argument for your cause?
[edit on 24-4-2009 by Chucktah]
Originally posted by neformore
This has been an interesting debate so far....
I would simply like to ask - at this point - two questions to those people who are actively supporting the idea of the use of torture techniques, and they are;
When you stoop to the lowest levels of torture, don't you become as bad as those who you seek to condem?
If so - what right have you to judge them in the first place, when you are no better?
Originally posted by drwizardphd
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
Really wheres the link?
Kinda also funny that again congress (both sides of theaisle) courts lawers and the pres said it was okay.
After World War II, we convicted several Japanese soldiers for waterboarding American and Allied prisoners of war. At the trial of his captors, then-Lt. Chase J. Nielsen, one of the 1942 Army Air Forces officers who flew in the Doolittle Raid and was captured by the Japanese, testified: "I was given several types of torture. . . . I was given what they call the water cure." He was asked what he felt when the Japanese soldiers poured the water. "Well, I felt more or less like I was drowning," he replied, "just gasping between life and death."
Source
Yes, we did consider waterboarding a war crime in the 1940's. We are possibly the most hypocritical nation in the world when it comes to matters of obeying international law. We invade countries on the premise that they don't obey it, yet we shirk it ourselves.
And just because the President, and members of Congress OK'd it, doesn't make it OK. It was a war crime then and it's a war crime now.
Originally posted by drwizardphd
Originally posted by dooper
Weenies and anti-Americans can now rejoice. As of this moment, dedicated CIA field agents will be abandoning their tasks, with many headed for retirement.
With any luck, the ones guilty of torturing will be "retiring" to jail cells.
Originally posted by dooper
Well, everyone rejoice, as we've got another big attack coming now.
The damage is done, it's irreversable, and hopefully, the attacks that are certain to come, will be in a neighborhood near you.
Congratulations.
Are you quite finished yet? I think I can speak for most Americans when I say we've had it with all of this moronic fear mongering. 9/11 would never have happened if the government did not play a complicit role in allowing it to happen, and the only thing torture has done for our nation is destroying our namesake.
Why don't you go bury your head in sand, and the rest of us can live out our lives with the liberty and freedom our forefathers intended. I don't know what it must feel like to constantly live in fear of the "terrorist menace", but the Bush administration's version of McCarthyism has obviously worked on you.
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
If you dont see stress tactics(waterboarding) as torture.
And yes we are better then the people who seek to our nations harm. Last time I checked no Americans flew in planes into there buildings.
Originally posted by Pilot303
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
They know that, they also know that if they are taking captive by the enemy they wont come home alive. let see waterboarding or death? I choose waterboarding. Kinda of a no brainer. Dont you think?
And who did we hang after WWII for waterboarding? I was under the impression from what I study NAZIs were put to death for the brutal rape,murder and torture(no waterboarding) of jews,poles,gyosy and whoever else they diddnt like. I dont know about you but my country has never started a war that can has clamied up to 80 Million lives( Not sure if that is the correct number.)
[edit on 23-4-2009 by poedxsoldiervet]
lol...this post proves it. You are most certainly not a member of any armed forces.
Once again, check this link if you would like to know about the US hanging people for waterboarding and considering it a war crime: It actually contains the words of John McCain. A man who knows a bit more than you about torture.Japanese Hanged for Waterboarding
Not all members of our forces imprisoned are put to death despite your suggestion that is so. When it happens, people can and will pay whenever possible (search google for a man named Saddam Hussein...he and others were hanged for various crimes against humanity). Not all of our troops are tortured. We (you) however are setting the precedent that it would be ok for that to happen.
It is very simple...if we say it is ok, it will be done to us.
Cliffs notes: Your premise is flawed and you do not understand the definition of "torture" (although many have tried to explain it to you). We have executed others for waterboarding as a war crime. Our authorities may see legal action themselves. It all makes perfect sense.
Your fiction basic training story is flawed logic. Try again!
Originally posted by Kryties
I am seeing a lot of responses from people in the armed forces or similar saying that it is not torture because they themselves have to endure similar in their basic training.
Bollocks.
YOU have a CHOICE and you get PAID to do it, these people don't. That is the difference.
Also, it does not surprise me to see that the armed forces indoctrinate their sheep to believe anything they are told, which is why we are seeing such blind faith being presented towards torture in this thread. You can present these guys with all the provable facts that you wish but it will not affect them - they will continue to believe that it is not torture because they do not know how to think for themselves.
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
Originally posted by Pilot303
Originally posted by Chucktah
reply to post by Pilot303
I would like to know how you think that these actions alone would put our soldiers into any more danger than they're already in? What is different now then 50 years ago? Why is it that just because the news is talking about waterboarding now, that our soldiers are at any greater risk then before? Is it because before, our enemies had morals? Or is it because that it is an easy argument for your cause?
[edit on 24-4-2009 by Chucktah]
Because things once considered war crimes no longer are. Do we really want to tell the world it is ok to torture prisoners in current and future conflicts?
If our soldiers are tortured in a similar manner, we sure can not prosecute those that did it. We just have to chalk it up to being how it is in war. Previous efforts by the international community have worked to protect POW rights with some success. We are throwing that out the window.
latimesblogs.latimes.com...
Exhibit A in the case for torture: Defenders of the practice say the waterboarding of Al Qaeda leader Khalid Sheik Mohammed produced information that allowed the U.S government to thwart a planned attack on Los Angeles in 2002.
According to a previously classified May 30, 2005, Justice Department memo that the Obama administration released last week, before he was waterboarded, when KSM was asked about planned attacks on the United States, he ominously told his CIA interrogators, “Soon, you will know.”
After the "enhanced techniques," which the agency used on him 183 times, KSM -- the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks -- told investigators about a "second wave" of terrorists from East Asia who planned to crash a hijacked airliner into a building in Los Angeles.
After he was subjected to the waterboarding technique, wrote Conservative News Service's Terence P. Jeffrey,"KSM became cooperative, providing intelligence that led to the capture of key Al Qaeda allies and, eventually, the closing down of an East Asian terrorist cell that had been tasked with carrying out the 9/11-style attack on Los Angeles."
Originally posted by Pilot303
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
Get your facts straight. I said ALL of our POWS from this WAR HAVE BEEN KILLED. . your premises are flawed sir, stop reading what you want to read and think you understand what I am talking about.
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
Again, Geneva convention does not apply to non uniformed combatants, so this has nothing to do with the terriost captured and being held at gitmo. In the initail Invasion of Iraq, Iraqi POW were treated with the utmost respect and after they were documented and determined they were not a threat they were sent back to there homes. As far as I know and can remeber no Iraqi POWs made it to gitmo from the initail war. Gitmo houses terriost not Uniformed Iraqi Soldiers. Hell even the Generals we captured were released, to include Feyadheen Commanders.