It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
reply to post by Spiramirabilis
I do still sleep very well at night knowing that my nation is semi safe. the bad guys are on the run and troopers are still out there whipping some arse. (now if we could start waterboarding everyone responsible for this economic mess Id be one happy camper-)
Another example of a "soldier" advocating the trashing of our Constitution.
Be afraid people. Be very afraid.
Okay where in here did I advocate the trashing of a constitution. But you are right people should be afraid, because people like you want the america to belly up to terriost, and serve the internationail comunity. WHo should they be afraid of?
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
no really its not the people who are responisable for the econmy need to be punished, if you do not see that maybe this nation is truly done for and I should move to Ireland or Aussie.
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
no really its not the people who are responisable for the econmy need to be punished, if you do not see that maybe this nation is truly done for and I should move to Ireland or Aussie.
Wow. wow. Wow.
Originally posted by dooper
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
You're probably one of those who only reads certain words of the Constitution, and ignores the others.
You had earlier referred to Amendment 8 of the Constitution that prohibits a soldier from using cruel or unusual punishment.
You selected only one phrase of a sentence, and missed the entire section that followed within the same sentence.
I've seen you do this before, to skewer an argument, and if you are compelled to resort to those dishonest tactics, then I know you aren't very certain of your position.
A soldier, during the conduct of warfare, does not fall under the Amendment 8, as a soldier is not a court, or a state, and this same soldier is not punishing an illegal act during the course of conducting warfare. Amendment 8 applies to civil law.
That's why we can't force pedophiles to shave their heads, wear turpentine rags around their ankles, and wear purple hats.
Get it???
That's just outright dishonest to isolate a portion of a sentence, and then make such a comparison.
The duty of a soldier in war is to find his enemy, and then kill him. The interrogation portion has to do with finding his enemy. Believe it or not, it's not a mere recreational exercise.
I think that the way things are going, it would be great if our military members let their enlistments expire, and all quit.
So that when the bad guys come to your hometown, you could handle it. After all, you have such a clear idea of how things should be done.
[edit on 23-4-2009 by dooper]
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
Are you serious, There are very real terriost out there( enemy combatant is a word I dont understand) who do wish to do you harm. I very much do understand the constition I read it all the time.
And how dare you you pompus ASS refer to me as a lower class, you know damn well you wouldnt say that to my face you keyboard warrior. I am a "third of the lower class" who just happens to be educate from the university of maryland (3.4GPA) lower class loser. you talk about how I get personal, jeez.
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by poedxsoldiervet
Dont take it personal bud. You will see that a lot from people on the far left, they try to manipulate facts and distort. Then when you provide the facts they dont like, they start attacking you personally.
I have stated in a few posts on here the hard facts both in the geneva convention and, the fact that the UDHR is not a law binding document, its set as a guideline, so.......infact, no laws have been broken. They dont like that so they start in on other things, insulting intelligence etc.
If you like, people, i can post AGAIN. Just because you dont like the facts, doesnt mean they are anything less
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
Are you serious, There are very real terriost out there( enemy combatant is a word I dont understand) who do wish to do you harm. I very much do understand the constition I read it all the time.
And how dare you you pompus ASS refer to me as a lower class, you know damn well you wouldnt say that to my face you keyboard warrior. I am a "third of the lower class" who just happens to be educate from the university of maryland (3.4GPA) lower class loser. you talk about how I get personal, jeez.
Yes, there are real terrorists out there. Have you considered that our soldiers, that are illegally occupying a country (more than one, actually) fit that description as well as the brown people you are so eager to kill?
You obviously do not read the constitution, or you would understand that you are in violation of it.
I have no issue calling anyone what I think they are. You are the one acting like an internet tough guy. Telling me I wouldnt say that to your face....yeah, another hypocrisy from you.
I didnt actually call you lower class though, I said the armed forces recruit the LOWER THIRD OF OUR GRADUATING CLASS, which is fact. Sorry you cant handle that.
Originally posted by dooper
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
For example, you do know that slavery is still Constitutional, don't you?
Originally posted by poedxsoldiervet
oh so now Im a racist? you really have to be serious, Ill give my address and you can come here and visit me if you would so like to? I just dont understand people like you.
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by poedxsoldiervet
Dont take it personal bud. You will see that a lot from people on the far left, they try to manipulate facts and distort. Then when you provide the facts they dont like, they start attacking you personally.
I have stated in a few posts on here the hard facts both in the geneva convention and, the fact that the UDHR is not a law binding document, its set as a guideline, so.......infact, no laws have been broken. They dont like that so they start in on other things, insulting intelligence etc.
If you like, people, i can post AGAIN. Just because you dont like the facts, doesnt mean they are anything less
I love this. Let's just ignore the fact that the Geneva Convention is secondary to constitutional law. Typical.
Originally posted by dooper
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic
And you continue to ignore that soldiers conducting war, in a warzone, against warring factions, don't even get close to conflicting with our Constitution.
It's like speaking to a post.
The Eighth Amendment does not apply to soldiers in a warzone conducting warfare.
The Eighth Amendment is to prevent States from passing foolish, overly creative punishments for CRIMES.
Dang! Can we get any slower?