reply to post by Valeri
It would be great to learn more from you, but your arrogant spittle is like poison to an inquisitive mind.
Put that in your Mayan pipe and smoke it.
FROM remote observatories on the Tibetan plateau to a cave in a Shanghai suburb, Chinese researchers were this week poised for an ambitious once-in-a-century experiment. The plan is to investigate a controversial notion that few in the west have the means or motivation to look at: the possibility that gravity suddenly drops by a minute amount during a total solar eclipse.
As New Scientist went to press, geophysicists from the Chinese Academy of Sciences were preparing an array of sensitive instruments at six sites across China ready to take gravity readings on Wednesday, 22 July, as the eclipse passed over the south of the country. The experimenters hope the results, which will be analysed in the coming months, will confirm once and for all that anomalous fluctuations recorded during past eclipses are a real phenomenon, rather than an experimental artefact.
Gravity has been measured during some 20 subsequent total solar eclipses, in China, Zambia, Australia and elsewhere. A 1997 experiment by the Chinese Academy of Sciences in north-eastern China provided some of the best evidence of a possible anomaly, according to Duif. But most of these tests featured only one or two pendulums or gravimeters - precise scales that can measure minute changes in gravity - set up close to each other. The results remain inconclusive. For the 1999 eclipse over Europe, NASA organised a multi-site experiment, but the researcher heading the project left soon after the eclipse and the findings were never made public.
If the anomaly exists, it would challenge our ideas about how gravity works. Neither Newtonian physics nor general relativity can explain it.
Originally posted by poet1bSeems you didn't get what I just wrote prior. try to tell that to any scientist or more so to a historian or geologist, people who study time in one way or another and watch how they look at you.
reply to post by Valeri
Actually, the new millennium started Jan 1, 2000. At midnight, Jan 1, 2000, the millennium was one day, and zero years old. At midnight, Dec 31st, 2000 the millennium was one year old. Jan 1, 2001 was the start of the second year. At midnight, Jan 1, 2001, the millennium was one day, and one year old. The start point is zero.
Originally posted by cosmicpixiequite possible.I have no proof to reject that theory and I strongly believe thta the elite is in contact with one or more species form other planets/dimensions.(the greys being one).
reply to post by Valeri
I'm not a christian or any other religious type so I know what you are saying about the way the bible came to be. I do think however that the PTB are manifesting propechy deliberately to lay the groundwork for their ET "masters" to usher in their "new world". Not everyone who talks about the bible is Christian you know...........I use the bible as a research tool to try and understand what their next moves will be.
Originally posted by cosmicpixie
The Temple Institute Website- Updates regarding progress of plans to rebuild templed
Couple of newsbites:
Muslim leader wants temple rebuilt, discussions have been underway
Apparantly it could be rebuilt in just one year
world's largest temple model is inaugerated next to temple mount
And on a side note, the timeline mentioned in the OP is slightly off....it actually runs from July 11th , with 21-12-2012 being smack in the middle and the end date being 3rd June 2016...that is exactly 2520 days inclusive of the start/end dates
Illuminati timeline 2009-2016
Originally posted by WickettheRabbitagain,completely misunderstood. By my logic babies are born at age 0 precisely,and by the end of 1 year being alive they turn 1!!
reply to post by Valeri
I know I'm late to this argument, but you are saying that the calendar started out at 1. I'm saying the calendar started at 0. Therefore, the end of the first year is 1 year or 1 AD.
By your logic, all babies when born are 1 and the completion of that first year marks year 2. Not right.
The year mark, i.e. 1999 marks that one-thousand, nine-hundred and ninety-nine years have past and that any months past that are in addition to those years.
You're off...the rest of the world is...on.