posted on Apr, 22 2009 @ 07:33 AM
Hello,
If im not mistaken, are trying to inform us that Russia is exercising its muscle ? , or are you trying to inform us that NATO is provoking a new
conflict ?
Either way, the Georgian based so called democratically elected government was financed by the c)i*a. This has been well established, you would only
need to review the campaigns that were aired and listened to and take note of which ad agency's handled the conditioning process.
That being said, when the world was shown a drone being shot down by RUS fighters over the conflict zone, no one went into the topic on who supplied
the Georgian intelligence with a drone?. But wait, it only gets better. When the world was informed that Iran had drones, there was a mass posting
through the internet on how evil Iran is.
Back to the Georgian topic, given the fact that the Georgian population was tricked in believing that U.S. or NATO would render aid when the counter
attack from Russia was to begin, were lets say, they were left holding their testicles in there hands and told to run. It was obvious even to the
lamest person that the volume of Russian forces that counter attacked was NOT expected by anyorganization or world committee. That being said, Georgia
has two options on the table by both NATO and Russia.
As a few analysts have said off the record, their playing Russian roulette now
On a lighter note, how stupid would a leader of a country be in thinking that a Super Power would not counter attack or attack when its interests are
being questioned by inferior nations. You only need to look at recent world politics which resulted in so called preemptive strikes.
Food for thought :
"There’s a well-accepted definition for preemptive war in international law," Joseph Cirincione, Director of the Non-Proliferation Project of the
Carnegie Endowment, told me on the telephone last week. "Preemptive war is justified by an imminent threat of attack, a clear and present danger that
the country in question is about to attack you. In such a case a preemptive attack is recognized as justifiable."