It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Anonymous Avatar
Nice. Maybe Obama can start placing carbon taxes on fat people.
We live in a society where we produce unhealthy, processed foods, with tons of pesticides coupled with 150 channels in HD and then as a society we complain there are fat people and blame global warming on them.
While I do believe in the end the individual is responsible for their own weight, health, and lifestyle, maybe if there wasn't a McDonald's, Whataburger, Burger King, Pizza Hut, Jack in the Box, KFC, and Wendy's all on the same corner every 2 or 3 blocks, it might help out a bit.
So who do you blame? McDonald's for raising enough cows (along with their methane farts) for a billion fatty burgers or the masses of people who are willing to buy the billion fatty burgers and greasy french fries?
Either way in the grand scheme of things as inefficient as living such a lifestyle is from the point of view of the forest, this argument that fat people's large quantity of foods contributing to global warming in a significant way is just ridiculous.
Originally posted by chise61
Not all overwieght people are overwieght due to an illness, nor are they all overwieght due to not being able to ("shut their pie hole":@@.
There are many people that are overwieght due to their income. Some low income people can barely afford to eat two meals daily, some only one and the food that they can afford to eat are the types of food that can cause people to gain wieght.
Did you (or any of those like you that choose to vilify the overwieght) ever give any thought to the fact that the significant rise in obesity may have more to do with the additives that are put into almost every food that is eaten ?
To make a blanket statement and catagorize all overwieght people as not being able to "shut their pie holes" is not only callous, but also ignorant.
Do you know for a fact that your insurance deductable, or the cost of your coverage will or has increased to pay for overwieght people ?
You have a problem with people that are overwieght or don't stop smoking, why ????? Does their behavior somehow directly affect you ? Who are you to say what people should or shouldn't put in their mouths, or their lungs, what gives you the authority to say when or how often people should eat pizza or cheseburgers,etc, if people should smoke or not ?
Originally posted by Blanca Rose
So, they can only afford starchy food versus say, fruit? C'mon, prove it. They have a CHOICE, even if they are poor as to what to eat. Nobody is forcing them to eat food that only allows them to gain weight.
Why of course. That is why I read the package label on every item I buy at the store, so as to avoid those types of food.
If you say so! However, I am entitled to my opinion, even if you don't agree with it. I happen to think your attitude that people are forced to eat food that makes them gain weight, versus a peice of fruit is ignorant!
As a matter of fact, yes, I do. And for some of the other reasons you mention in addition to obesity. I had to select health plan coverage for an employer, and also explain to the employess why costs had gone up.
For the answers I gave you above. Second hand smoke is bad, and so is poor dietary choices. Do you have a problem admitting that?
When did I say I had a right to tell people what to eat? I have issues with bad choices, and that is my right!
edit to fix quote
[edit on 21-4-2009 by Blanca Rose]
[edit on 21-4-2009 by Blanca Rose]
I'm not "overweight" because I eat burgers and fries every day (which I don't), nor because I'm "too lazy too get off my ass" (which I'm not). I'm not "overweight" because I eat badly. I'm "overweight" because some government watchdog decided to set a limit about what weight is acceptable.
Here's a fun fact for you. My nutritionalist actually said that my "weight problem" is because I eat too little not too much. Yes, that's right. I eat little and my body thinks it is in a famine and therefore saves most of what I eat as fat.
Originally posted by AngelInterceptor
So say we have two neighbours. One is overweight and one is not.
The overweight person recycles everything they can. They do not drive. They do not take oversease trips. They religiously turn off all the things they are not using. They grow their own vegs and buy local produce.
Originally posted by Dutty_Rag
reply to post by AngelInterceptor
I'm not "overweight" because I eat burgers and fries every day (which I don't), nor because I'm "too lazy too get off my ass" (which I'm not). I'm not "overweight" because I eat badly. I'm "overweight" because some government watchdog decided to set a limit about what weight is acceptable.
Here's a fun fact for you. My nutritionalist actually said that my "weight problem" is because I eat too little not too much. Yes, that's right. I eat little and my body thinks it is in a famine and therefore saves most of what I eat as fat.
Oh please - they all have excuses. Fact is if you spend an hour a day in the gym, you will lose weight.
Do it please for all our sakes - you are killing the planet with your vile emissions.