Bloodlines - what's the big deal?, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 25-4-2009 @ 11:37 PM by CIAGypsy
Originally posted by vcwxvwligen

You've never heard of Zbigniew Brzezinski, Carroll Quigley, The Northwood Documents, the Iron Mountain report or the Plan for a New American Century. You've also never heard of JFK or Harry Truman.

You also didn't hear about Barack Obama's plan to reduce the population.

The difference between me and you is your premise that proof must not exist.


Sure, I've heard. But the difference between you and me is that I understand logic and human nature. No one ever said there was no such thing as government corruption. However, there is an enormous difference between "world domination" or "New World Order" and some government agenda. (And before you go there...yes, I've read Jim Marrs and all the others. Interesting theories, but simply too complex for human nature. Think Occam's Razor and you're more likely to hit the truth.)


ETA - Let me be clear that there is no doubt that conspiracies exist to cover up government corruption. But the topic of this post is in reference to Bloodlines. Specifically, "Illuminati" Bloodlines...or those who are thought to want world domination. Some even go further in their musings and comment that such "people", if they exist, must certainly be Satanic. From the "proof" I've seen, read, and with the helping of the understanding of human nature, it seems to me that these "claims" make for interesting and entertaining stories, but nothing more.

[edit on 25-4-2009 by CIAGypsy]


reply posted on 25-4-2009 @ 11:46 PM by vcwxvwligen
reply to post by CIAGypsy



Government corruption? Really? I guess you believe in socialism as well?


reply posted on 25-4-2009 @ 11:52 PM by CIAGypsy
reply to post by vcwxvwligen




Quite the contrary, actually. I believe in the vision of America as intended by our founding fathers. But I also understand that it is all in how you look at it...and understanding the microcosm in the macrocosm.



reply posted on 25-4-2009 @ 11:57 PM by vcwxvwligen
reply to post by CIAGypsy



I'm sure you know that the most powerful people in America still pay their allegiance to the British Empire, and that America was founded on English common law.


reply posted on 26-4-2009 @ 12:07 AM by CIAGypsy
reply to post by vcwxvwligen



I know more about history than you will ever know or understand... But what I know or believe isn't really that important....nor is it my job to "convince" you of anything. It's all about perspective, my friend. Let's pretend for a moment that you are right....that the world is under the control of some vast conspiracy orchestrated by a select few powerful families who worship Satan and have the world marching to the tune like a marionette. What are YOU going to do about it? What can you POSSIBLY do about it?

[edit on 26-4-2009 by CIAGypsy]


reply posted on 10-7-2012 @ 01:15 AM by ickylicky501
The only reason that even began to even notice that their was even any type of relevance to the bloodline theory is because of the studying that I was doing and the book that I was reading made a point about the book of Genesis and the verse when the Lord is speaking to the serpent and he is repremanding him for doing what he did with Eve. Genesis chapter 2 verse 15:[3:15] I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will strike your head, and you will strike his heel." If you notice there is a part in there where he states beteween your offspring and hers! Wow, how that blew my mind the first time that that was pointed out to me. I have read Genesis so many times and I never ever noticed that, I definitely remember reading that but it never occoured to me that it meant what it says. Your seed and hers. SO if you think about what that is saying then it means that the serpent was going to have his own seed and she would have hers as well and the two would not get along. That was how it was to be for all time. That is why some of us are Godly and some of us are inherintly un Godly. If you want to be technical think about what "seed" means. A seedline as we also call it is a line of lineage that started at the begining of time with the begining of creation right?? So what I get from that is Satan tempted Eve and her temptation led to a seedline. That is the controversial part because in that part of Genesis it does not speak of her doing anything other than eating fruit but many people believe that that was simply another way of saying that she engaged in the Serpents "fruit". That is why people who talk about how Satan is the giver of "LIGHT" he is the one that shared knowledge with mankind and gave us information that we otherwise would not have had. But this also created death. This is also said to have been the time that the serpent stold mans DNA and used it to empower mankind. This was taken or stolen from the Lord though. He did not permit or allow this it was done with out his permission, and it led mankind down a path that we were not supposed to go down. With that knowledge came our downfall. that is or must be why we were not supposed to have it. The book of Enoch is supposed tell us all of the real reasons that we also became so knowledgable. This book teaches all about "Fallen angels" and how they came down to earth and persued women of the earth. They interbread and the race of Giants was created. This was supposedly during the time that Atlantis was on earth. It was also the reason for the flood and Noah making the ark. A very GOOD book. I learned this last year as well. It was one of the lost books of the bible and it spoken of or brought up in other relevant books in the bible. We were not allowed to know most of this information before now but because of technology and the fact that we have come to a place where mankind is being let in on more and more information we are now finding out that there really are two sides to the story biologically.


reply posted on 10-7-2012 @ 10:44 AM by Johnathanandheather
reply to post by Roark



"it's in my genes" or "politics run in our blood"

If you came from a line of cops and you became a cop, would it because of
Learned behavior or in your blood or a little of both?

Obama being relAted to Cheeny and T. Jefferson or what about Bush & Kerry
being related to the queen of England but Bush was closer in relation.

The oldest example by far would be Noah's brother and Levi's being priests.
I think even the tribes were/are attributed to having certain qualities.

On the negative side I have read of a sinister blood line, Not sure if it is
claimed to start with Cain or with Jacob's brother Esau and Edomites being
some sort of satanic blood line. Edomites and all that.



reply posted on 12-7-2012 @ 09:20 AM by CIAGypsy
reply to post by Johnathanandheather




Hey, guess what???? All of mankind is related to each other in some form or fashion.... I know that might be shocking, but its true. And when you trace the genetics of American history, you'll find quite a few people....ordinary people with no wealth, power, or special "bloodlines"....who are DIRECT descendants of European royalty. Take a skip around Ancestry.com messages boards if you need further proof.

Bloodlines are nothing. Everyone has a bloodline. Everyone is inter-related in some fashion. It's the nature of the human condition unless you are a pure descendant from a Neanderthal or Hobbit (looks around at a few people here on ATS.....)



reply posted on 21-7-2012 @ 03:41 AM by halfoldman
Well, why does one person sit on a throne with a crown, and fronts an entire church, with jewels, and royal weddings, and family with lots of private properties that are open only to family or persons of their choosing, and their kids never have to worry about affirmative action, even though they're lily white.
Unlike politics and political correctness for the common-man, they don't have to be representative to rule.

Why is the other person borrowing or struggling to make ends meet, and comparing their own boring lives to royal weddings and gossip?

Why?

Well the one person was born into a royal bloodline, and the other was not.

The House of Lords was minor royalty, why use that example for one of the most ostentatious constitutional monarchies on the planet?

The difference between sitting on a throne or scrubbing it is bloodline.

That's it - bloodline equals "privilege" to royalty, and even the most mediocre, boring and unattractive royal twat can be made to look like a hero.
It is not a station in life that's deserved or earned, which is expected of most other people.

I like royalty, because in times of trouble they can provide leadership and galvanizing symbolism.
Some of them have clearly deserved certain achievements; others probably used their birth-rights.
On the other hand one must admit that it is profoundly unfair, and becomes extremely undeserved when the royals act common.
They should at least make the effort to act royal for all their privileges.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



ATS Banner! !?! <--- EXPLAIN THYSELVES...
  Posted 10 days ago with 8 member flags
Freemasons, the Illuminati and the American Revolution
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
What is this ring from? Masonic or other private group?
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags
On the Subject of Riches
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags
The Missing link to every secret society
  Posted 9 days ago with 4 member flags
Masonic Pouch?
  Posted 13 days ago with 3 member flags
Are there any real spooks on here?
  Posted 3 days ago with 3 member flags