This is not a repost:
Spiky UFO Brazil
Real good video, spikey ufo in brazil
Another YouTube Video - Objeto Nao Identificado
Somewhere in Brazil a grandmother was filming her grandchildren when this happened
it's a re- re- re- re- re- post, to say the very very least, but even a re-re-re-re-re post is welcome, if it adds to what has been said previously:
sadly, this doesn't seem to be the case.
Whenever we discuss a video from the internet, hosted on YouTube or on any other video sharing website/portal characterized by lossy compression, the
first thing to do is to find the older version of the video, just in order to watch something close to the original footage instead of a bunch of
pixels: in this case, the first internet version of the video can be found here
uploaded on december, 2007 by queirozcomz (Shirley de Queiroz).
A good stabilized version can be found here:
motion tracked\stabilized, grain reduction, levels adjustments, scaled 412%, time scaled from 1:40 to :18
made by spf33
I've read some claims about some alleged shape-shifting in the alleged UFO: yes it changes shape, because the balloon wasn't completely filled with
Helium, and because a good 20% of what we can see in that version of the video is a bunch of misplaced pixels: what we see is NOT what was originally
caught on camera.
Whenever you watch a video showing something which shape is complex, the first thing to do is to find the part of the video in which the shape is more
clear: and it's way better to ignore all the rest than to consider it, because it's not just irrelevant but even misleading.
is an enhancement i've made using a forensic tool, from a screen capture taken in the moment that the object was most clear: this is more or less the
actual shape of what we see (relatively to the crappy quality of the video). It's a resample made using a bicubic algorithm, but it's reliable
could be 12,13 or 14: and let's compare them with the balloon mentioned in the article (which may NOT be the same of the one of the video)
they could be 12, 13 or 14, not less, no more.
It could be the same balloon, it could be not, but this is not the point:
the point is that the one of balloons shaped like this one, was a TREND at the time and in that area, and this was reported by local investigators who
went physically there.
The resembleance between the two is impressive: if it's not the same thing then it's something of VERY similar, but alternatively we can speculate
that it's some alien spacecraft disguised as that specific type of balloon.
Another detail: the ufologist who dismissed it as balloon is Claudeir Covo:
i won't tell you about him, Google will do it in myu behalf.
All i can teel you about him is that he's not what you would call some skeptik: just google his name and you will see.
He is a SERIOUS researcher in the field of UFOlogy: www.infa.com.br...
he's the director of the National Institute of Investigations on the AeroSpacial Phenomena;
he investigated in FIRST PERSON the case and he concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that it was a balloon after doing comprehensive investigations in
the area, but he even wanted to ask for the opinion of Osmar de Freitas (GEONI UFO research group), who was also a balloon maker
concluded it was a balloon.
When we told Shirley (the woman who took the video) that it was a balloon, she didn’t accept the conclusion.
It seems that she's not alone.
The shape is the one of those balloons, the behavior is the same, the best local researcher concluded that it was a balloon, a local manifacture
confirmed that it was a balloon.
And do someone asked to himself how comes that the video does NOT show neither the moment when the object comes nor the moment when the objects goes?
Battery low? Once again?