Something I’ve been thinking about. Where does the UN fit into the NWO? AMERICA uses the
UN at its leisure. AMERICA likes hold other countries accountable to any UN sanctions but the
UN better not think that AMERICA will abide by the same sanctions. The U.S. likes to ask for a
UN ‘ok’ but if it doesn’t get it, the U.S. does it anyway. The U.S. always as a ‘better’ plan. Now,
in Europe, the UN seems to have more say or the European countries just don’t want to really get
involved in a situation and concede control to the UN. There are many examples of each but that
is not the point.

Two things need to happen. 1) The UN would have to take a bigger or more active,
agressive role in world situations. Not just have UN troops in an area but not be able to manuver
‘proactivly’. The UN is basicaly a true ‘paper tiger’. Looks like a bad ass on paper but thats it. 2)
The U.S. would have to begin conceding control or abiding by UN direction alot more. I don’t
really see either happening to soon.

So how could a situation where the U.S. and the UN actually worked together and become a
force to be reconed with happen? Once again, two things would need to happen. A change of
heart in the AMERICAN govt and more control over the u.s. population by the AMERICAN
govt. The American population is, arguably, the only real hurdle in the way of a NWO. Control
the population. Be able to watch whoever ,whenever, for whatever reason. Be able to listen,
track, survail anybody. Make sure the govt controls or is able to greatly influnce most aspects of a
persons public and private life. Give police alot of power and big guns. Increase the diversity of
the population, ie make ileagal aliens legal..people who are used to living with no freedoms...they
will not notice the traditional American freedoms being taken away. Take away the peoples
weapons or know who owns them. This is already happening...Say..isn’t Bush running around
campainging for the Patriot Act crap again???

Now a change of heart of the AMERICAN govt torwards the UN is a bit diferent. Will Bush
conceede control to the UN in world situations?? I don’t think so. On the other hand we have
Kerry. He would like to work with the UN more. Hmmm. So on one hand we have Bush setting
up controls for the American population, all in the name of the ‘war on terrorism’, and setting up
a situation where large number of U.S. troops/ Nat’l Gaurd/Res will be sationed, more or less
long term, overseas. On the other hand we have Kerry, who would like us to cooperate more with
the UN.

So, is the U.S. population suficantly controled...or do we need another fours years to realy put us under pressure?? OR, is AMERICA ready to start 'working with the UN in world situations???

Even is Bush does not become Pres again, I'm sure the patriot act will pass again. Then you will have a pres that has a powerful tool to use, and would like to work with the UN more.....adding AMERICAN military to the UN to help the UN become the 'police force' of the world.
we are between a rock and a cliff. the next few years will be a turning point in American histroy. Revolution or complacency and ignorance. The later tends to rule AMERICANS...they will do what ever needed to avoid the short term pain, put it off untill it absolutly, positivly has to be done overnight.......move very slowly and your enemy will never know that you have put the gun to his head untill it is too late...that is the situation America faces in the next few years.
What will you take with you when you have to make the desicion to leave your home in 10 mins......and to defend freedom or to defend the govt system of the now........

there are EO's that give the 'world heritage system' some type of weird control over areas of the U.S. could these be protected by the U.N in a 'crisis' situation??????

can you link us to or copy and paste the EO's?