Another F-22 Class A, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 16-4-2009 @ 09:46 PM by jerico65
reply to post by Zaphod58




Eh, that *SNIP*will buff out.

I wonder how this will reflect on someones EPR or OER? Might be a bit of a blemish!

Mod Edit: No profanity please

[edit on 4/18/09 by FredT]


reply posted on 16-4-2009 @ 10:07 PM by WestPoint23
reply to post by Zaphod58



That's not even the best quote from that release. I love the 'jets don't taxi at NASCAR speeds' bit. My understanding is that the damage is relatively minor, even if expensive.



reply posted on 16-4-2009 @ 10:49 PM by Zaphod58
reply to post by WestPoint23



Yeah, that was a good quote too. The damage may have been minor, and it may not take long to repair, but this is NOT setting up a good safety record for the aircraft to start with. Counting test aircraft, we have two crashes, one torn up engine from RAM coming off, one jammed canopy that had to be cut through, and a ground collision. All in the space of a small handful of years.


reply posted on 16-4-2009 @ 11:30 PM by WestPoint23
reply to post by Zaphod58



Wasn't there also a pin that went through the engine, or was that another model? Still it been almost 4 years under 'combat' operations, some of the problems are clearly human error. From what I gather the F-16's and F-15 were not that much better.


reply posted on 17-4-2009 @ 01:30 AM by Zaphod58
reply to post by TheAgentNineteen



Class A is anything over $1M in damage. Stealth is expensive, because of the RAM. On some aircraft, you can't replace the RAM in small pieces, you have to replace it over the entire aircraft. The RAM on the F-117 initially was put on in pieces, and could be taken off in pieces. The last time they updated the coating, they put it on in one giant piece that covered the entire aircraft.


reply posted on 17-4-2009 @ 11:36 PM by Jezza
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to
post by TheAgentNineteen



Class A is anything over $1M in damage. Stealth is expensive, because of the RAM. On some aircraft, you can't replace the RAM in small pieces, you have to replace it over the entire aircraft. The RAM on the F-117 initially was put on in pieces, and could be taken off in pieces. The last time they updated the coating, they put it on in one giant piece that covered the entire aircraft.


Thats why it costs a lot to maintain and repair.
Too much labor man hours going into the F-22.



reply posted on 18-4-2009 @ 12:50 AM by Zaphod58
reply to post by Jezza



It isn't just the F-22, or stealth. On June 15, 2003 F-16 88-0421 collided with 88-0516 on the ground in Qatar at approximately 10 knots. Aircraft 421 suffered significant damage to the radome and nose bulkhead, as well as the radar. Both aircraft suffered damage, one maintenance troop was injured, and several pieces of AGE were damaged. Both aircraft at the time were fully loaded, and they COULD have lost 7 aircraft if not for quick thinking maintenance troops.

ANY aircraft can have a major accident while on the taxiway, or parked, or at any other time. Yes the F-22 will be more expensive to repair, but it's not JUST the F-22 that can hurt a lot to fix after a ground collision.


reply posted on 20-4-2009 @ 05:11 PM by Wakeupcall
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to
post by WestPoint23



Yeah, that was a good quote too. The damage may have been minor, and it may not take long to repair, but this is NOT setting up a good safety record for the aircraft to start with. Counting test aircraft, we have two crashes, one torn up engine from RAM coming off, one jammed canopy that had to be cut through, and a ground collision. All in the space of a small handful of years.


Small nit pick, but how can you possibly put a mark against the aircrafts safety record in a ground collision? Clearly had nothing to do with the aircraft, pilot yes, aircraft no. Love it or hate it, you can't find any fault with the -22 in a ground collision.


reply posted on 20-4-2009 @ 05:19 PM by Zaphod58
reply to post by Wakeupcall



Because we don't KNOW that it was the pilot. The initial report that I heard that came from the squadron commander of the Hornet squadron was that he lost nosewheel steering before he hit.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



In Case Of Videos Of Flying People
  Posted 10 days ago with 9 member flags
First flight for \'flapless\' plane - the Evolution of Aviation
  Posted 13 days ago with 4 member flags
Boeing X-37 and X-40 - the ultimate history
  Posted 6 days ago with 3 member flags
F22 mishap or more that meeets the eye?
  Posted 1 days ago with 3 member flags
Its a bird, its a plane, no its a ....
  Posted 14 days ago with 0 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 184 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 10 hours ago, 99 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 6 hours ago, 66 replies