What did Jesus do?

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Feb, 9 2003 @ 04:12 AM
link   
wow FreeMason is getting




posted on Feb, 9 2003 @ 05:04 PM
link   
Well it's funny because every learned scholar on the subject seems to agree that the translation of the Old Testiment from the Hebrew Bible to the Christian Bible was changed repeatedly from Greek translations on to Roman translations.

And what's further odd, is I've been looking at the Hebrew Bible (The original old testiment) and the Christian Bible and they have MANY differences.

Hmm how can that have happend?

BECAUSE THE BIBLE HAS BEEN CHANGED! yeah like that's a shock hahahahaha...

Sincerely,
no signature



posted on Feb, 9 2003 @ 05:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by FreeMason
Well it's funny because every learned scholar on the subject seems to agree that the translation of the Old Testiment from the Hebrew Bible to the Christian Bible was changed repeatedly from Greek translations on to Roman translations.

And what's further odd, is I've been looking at the Hebrew Bible (The original old testiment) and the Christian Bible and they have MANY differences.

Hmm how can that have happend?

BECAUSE THE BIBLE HAS BEEN CHANGED! yeah like that's a shock hahahahaha...

Sincerely,
no signature



got example?



posted on Feb, 9 2003 @ 05:11 PM
link   
Amos...it's pretty much omitted from the OT, but knock me over with a feather, there it is in the True Old Testiment, the Hebrew BIBLE!

Sincerely,
no signature



posted on Feb, 9 2003 @ 05:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by FreeMason
Amos...it's pretty much omitted from the OT, but knock me over with a feather, there it is in the True Old Testiment, the Hebrew BIBLE!

Sincerely,
no signature



okay...can you reference it?


point to the verse or what not?



posted on Feb, 9 2003 @ 05:25 PM
link   
Truely your argument is so niavely wrong, or verifiably stupid, that any creedence you had with me had gone through the floor.

Some books, macabees, Amos, even esther, were debated and left out because they don't talk about God, they are historical books only. The Catholic OT includes these books.

Note that these books are easily read by people if they want, they are not hidden, contain secret knowledge, or any other rubbish you wish to add. They were supferluous.

And where are all these scholars whom you are citing?

You truely don't have a clue....



posted on Feb, 9 2003 @ 05:27 PM
link   
oh crap he is talking about books... damn.


i thought he was referencing specific words... you know that have been taken out over time.


but a book is what he is talkin about.


messed up.


thats a first.





new topics
top topics
 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join