The Lubbock lights., page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 18 times


reply posted on 31-3-2010 @ 03:51 AM by Jocko Flocko
"All of this throws their credibility into question. Four doddering old men realize in life they never accomplished much and so created this elaborate hoax as a means to be well known by society since their peers did not respect them since they werent published enough to be respected and taken seriously in scientific circles. "

You just lost any credibility on this board as a "skeptic" by trying to draw attention away from the facts and the fully documented evidence that is clear as day. It's a pathetic tactic used quite often but isn't going to be allowed with cases such as this one; go back to the kiddie threads and debunk some more youtube videos.

Excellent topic Karl and Internos. Many thanks for the effort.

""The object was tracked continuously for a period of six minutes and made a timed ground speed of 950 mph. The object was on a course of 340 degrees with only slight deviations enroute. An altitude reading of 13,000 feet was obtained but the accuracy of the measurement is questionable due to brief length of time the object was detected. The F-86 aircraft were scrambled but radar contact with the object was lost before the aircraft were airborne, A visual search was conducted from 17,000 to 25,000 feet with negative results. The operator of the radar set, an Air Force Captain, is considered to be an expert operator.""

So, here we have trained radar operators taking readings of an unknown object traveling at high speeds with an intercept aircraft launched to investigate... I find it FAR from probable that these trained radar observers were seeing interference of some-kind, especially when a jet is scrambled to intercept the object. These observers are trained over and over again to be able to tell the differences between actual moving objects and false positive echo returns. For an aircraft to be scrambled at a an airbase there's usually more than one radar station involved in the tracking of objects as well.


reply posted on 7-5-2010 @ 01:15 PM by karl 12
Originally posted by Jocko Flocko
In all of the "declassified" documentation you guys have read through, have you guys come across the names of the pilots involved in these kinds of cases where aircraft have been scrambled to intercept the unknown object (s)?



Jocko, thanks for the reply matey - there are a few examples in
this thread and quite a few other freaky pilot UFO incidents listed here - I know we've discussed it before but I still think one of the more unusual cases is the Minot AFB incident from 1968:


The Minot AFB B-52 UFO Incident.




As for cross-checking Project BlueBook records for witness names and information - it seems a lot of the material was purposefully censored or deleted whilst at the National Archives in Washington, D.C.


THE BLUE BOOK UNKNOWNS

In January, 1974, I visited the U.S. Air Force Archives at Maxwell AFB, Montgomery, Ala., to review the files of Project Blue Book as the first step toward writing a book on the subject.

In a full week, I read all the "unexplained" cases in the original files and made extensive notes, including the names and other identifying information on all witnesses where given. The cooperation of the staff of the Archives was excellent, and no restrictions were placed on my work.

A few months later, the files were withdrawn from public view so they could be prepared for transfer to the National Archives in Washington, D.C. This process involved making a xerox copy of almost 30 file drawers of material, blacking out the names and other identifiers of all witnesses, and then microfilming the censored xerox copy. The microfilm has been available to the public at the National Archives since 1976. The original Project Blue Book files remain under lock and key at the Archives.

On almost every page of the 12,000+ case files, there are big black marks where information that could be used to cross-check Project Blue Book's controversial work has been censored.

This includes the names of witnesses to widely-publicized cases, and even names in newspaper clippings.

Link



Cheers.



reply posted on 8-5-2010 @ 07:26 AM by easynow
reply to post by karl 12



great case thanks for the info


it's highly unlikely these objects were ducks, i have seen them fly over at night and there is no mistaking them. if none of the witnesses said they were birds then they probably weren't. also flares wouldn't stay in a precise congruent formation like that, no way. i don't know what it was but it sure is interesting.

S$F


reply posted on 9-5-2010 @ 03:18 PM by easynow
reply to post by karl 12



obviously the lights weren't ducks and Lieutenant Ruppelt later reversed his bird conclusion and supposedly found out what it was but wouldn't reveal the info !

Ruppelt himself would come to reject the plover hypothesis, but frustratingly refrained from explaining what the lights in fact were:

"They weren't birds, they weren't refracted light, but they weren't spaceships. The lights ... have been positively identified as a very commonplace and easily explainable natural phenomenon. It is very unfortunate that I can't divulge ... the way the answer was found.... Telling the story would lead to [the identity of the scientist who "finally hit upon the answer"] and ... I promised the man complete anonymity"

en.wikipedia.org...



While investigating the Lubbock Lights, Ruppelt also learned that several people in and around Lubbock claimed to have seen a "flying wing" moving over the city (Clark, 347). Among the witnesses was the wife of Dr. Ducker, who reported that in August 1951 she had observed a "huge, soundless flying wing" pass over her house (Clark, 347). Ruppelt knew that the US Air Force did possess a "flying wing" jet bomber, and he felt that at least some of the sightings had been caused by the bomber, although he could not explain why, according to the witnesses, the wing made no sound as it flew overhead.

en.wikipedia.org...




en.wikipedia.org...


i don't think it was the flying wing aircraft because that makes zero sense when looking at the pictures

www.ufocasebook.com...
www.ufocasebook.com...

i doubt the wing aircraft had that many lights to begin with and i wouldn't believe for a second that they had the capability to make the lights appear in different patterns. the US Air Force Flying Wing was not what was photographed and it wasn't Birds so that doesn't leave too many choices does it ?


reply posted on 9-5-2010 @ 03:40 PM by karl 12
reply to post by easynow



Easynow - Isaac Koi has posted some very interesting info about the case in this thread and it appears there's quite a few unanswered questions about Ruppelt's opinion in the 'revised' edition of his book 'The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects.'


Apparently Ruppelt now stated the lights were caused by moths.


"The world famous Lubbock Lights were night flying moths reflecting the bluish-green light of a nearby row of mercury vapour street lights."


The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects by Captain Edward J. Ruppelt.

1959 Revised Edition.


Cheers.

[edit on 02/10/08 by karl 12]


reply posted on 9-5-2010 @ 06:56 PM by easynow
reply to post by karl 12



thanks for the link and Isaac Koi did a great job on that thread and got no replies

Apparently Ruppelt now stated the lights were caused by moths





i think Hynek's comment about Quintanilla should be applied to Ruppelt too !

“the flag of the utter nonsense school was flying at its highest on the mast.”

www.abovetopsecret.com...




there are some old Aircraft named Flying Moth or Tiger Moth but i don't think he was implying that since he said it was a "natural phenomena" and the witnesses would have no doubt heard these planes just like they would have heard the Air Force Flying Wing. not many choices left to pick from, if it wasn't a secret aircraft that had silent running capability then what else can we conclude ?


reply posted on 17-5-2010 @ 04:54 PM by karl 12
reply to post by easynow



Easynow, thanks for the reply bud -I don't see how anyone on God's green earth could think that this photograph shows 'moths' - that's got to be the best one yet.


Here's a nice clip from the movie 'Invaders from Mars' where the Lubbock Lights image pops up around 3:50 (U.K. version only for some reason):





Scene involving actual UFO reports of the period... missing from US releases. Obviously staged to be inserted or cut from the film. For some interesting reason, only in the UK version.


Cheers.


reply posted on 8-12-2011 @ 04:09 AM by dsm1664
reply to post by karl 12



Highly Reflective Duck Bellies.

I'm going to use that one...

ET? Lantern? Satellite?

No, HRDB!

Nice thread & video...



reply posted on 9-12-2011 @ 04:39 AM by karl 12
Originally posted by dsm1664
reply to
post by karl 12



Highly Reflective Duck Bellies.

I'm going to use that one...



Dsm1664, thanks for the reply and yes, the 'Highly Reflective Duck Bellies' debunk is quite a remarkable one - as is the 'Bluish-Green Night Flying Moth' explanation (link) - I don't know if you've seen it but Isaac has done some great work here collating references for the case and, although there's very little further information to go on, there's an article below concerning a similar sighting in the area four years earlier:


Eyewitness Spotted Lights 4 Years Before The Lubbock Sightings

One evening (9 or 10 PM) a few months later I was feeding my two dogs on the back patio of my home when my peripheral vision detected movement in the sky. I looked up and saw the lights in V formation. It was a perfect V with perhaps 5-7 lights along each line of the V. The lights were all the same size and in single file, unlike some of the photos being shown, and each light was a bit larger than the full moon, but much dimmer. They were perfectly circular, and they moved rapidly and silently. Geese never form a perfect V, are never perfectly round, are never silent (usually they are first detected by their honking), and their movement is relatively slow. These lights moved rapidly from NW to SE.

Although I first spotted them at about the apogee point, they crossed the sky in a matter of only about 3 or 4 seconds. The event was a surprise in itself, but I was in store for another surprise. Even though there was much horizon left for their movement, they totally disappeared at an elevation of about 30 degrees or so. It was as if a light switch had been flicked off. All of this occurred in the town of Dickinson, TX.


link


Cheers.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Egg found in Martian Meteorite
  Posted 18 days ago with 126 member flags
Bad Ufologists-Lets clean the closet of any skeletons
  Posted 9 days ago with 52 member flags
Death by UFO!
  Posted 15 days ago with 49 member flags
UFOs during Satellite launch
  Posted 9 days ago with 49 member flags
Ooparts and Ancient aliens
  Posted 1 days ago with 45 member flags
Tracey Taylor - "Aliens Gave Me a Special Gift"
  Posted 8 days ago with 31 member flags
DIVINE INTERVENTION: ETs Defeating Old World Order
  Posted 16 days ago with 29 member flags