Obama wants to build a nationwide light rail system, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 16-4-2009 @ 01:16 PM by cautiouslypessimistic
Originally posted by asmall89
reply to
post by cautiouslypessimistic



Yeah our shipping industry is failing... because our economy is failing. The problem with transporting goods with a high speed rail system is the terrain these trains have to go through out here. Up through curvy mountain passages with loads of snow. Yeah going real fast on an icy track is a great idea... It's like a car it's great if you can go fast but you got to be able to stop too. A 5 ton engine carrying tons of precious cargo going 120mph+ needs quite a bit of breaking power.

Yes there are improvements to our railway system we need, but replacing our already really good and well laid out system with another is a waste of money. They just need to update some of it thats all. High speed trains really have only one purpose, transporting people.

The shipping industry has been failing for years.

As far as terrain goes, the states of Oregon and Washington right now are working on tunneling under the columbia river(the fourth largest river in america by volume) to add another rail that goes from vancouver to portland. If this can be done, terrain is not a concern.

I still disagree that our railway is good. The only good thing about the system at this point is the length and intricacy of the tracks. Everything else about the system is antiquated.

There is plenty of documentation out there on the capability of HSR's in shipping, so I dont really need to get into that.



reply posted on 16-4-2009 @ 01:21 PM by cautiouslypessimistic
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
Originally posted by cautiouslypessimistic
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
reply to
post by cautiouslypessimistic



Maybe we do need a highspeed rail system. I think when the government balances its books and saves enough money to pay for it with cash instead of debt then we can debate the merits of it. By then, if it is viable capitalists will have already built it.



I get your point, but I feel like you really dont understand economics....




Wow, the strange thing is I was thinking exactly the same thing about you. You have good intent but you dont really understand economics.


It's interesting, the people that talk about stopping spending and the such are the ones that generally accuse people of not understandig economics...I know I fell into that trap, but come on, money HAS to be spent. You can either spend it in handouts, or you can spend it on infrastucture....which is the ONLY proven way to turn an economy around.


reply posted on 16-4-2009 @ 01:24 PM by justsomeboreddude
reply to post by cautiouslypessimistic



Money will be spent regardless. It is just better for people and buisnesses to make the choices on how to spend the money than it is for the government to take it from us and decide how they think it should be spent. The federal government employees 12% of the US workforce. That is insanity. If they cut spending and taxes by 25% this economy would light up like a Christmas tree.

Government doesnt make money they spend money. They are on the liablity side of the balance sheet.

[edit on 16-4-2009 by justsomeboreddude]

[edit on 16-4-2009 by justsomeboreddude]


reply posted on 16-4-2009 @ 01:29 PM by octotom
I think that it's kinda silly to say that we, the US, should build a rail system simply because they use them in Europe. I'll admit, I love riding in the trains over here but it makes more sense over here for several reasons.

1)The countries are smaller--maintaing the rail infrastructure isn't as difficult.

2)The individual countries are more compact--I can travel from northern Germany to Budapest Hungary relatively quickly on a train if I ride the right one. [The ride by car from Düsseldorf, Germany to Budapest, Hungary by car is nine hours, traveling at 90mph--that's the amount of time it takes to get from south Florida to Florida's westernmost tip!]

3)Owning a car is downright expensive here in Europe.

I've always thought that sheer size of America is one reason trains died out--I know I wouldn't want to be on a train for a week just to get to California! Even with the improvement in technology, I think that people would only use trains in the US if that train was going faster than the speed of sound [maybe an exaggeration] so that you're not wasting days of your life. Why take a train if you can fly there in a fraction of the time?

If a rail system is started again in America, I just hope that it's not government run. There is one train line here in Germany--Deutsche Bahn--and it's run by the government. It's well known that they manipulate the prices in ridiculous ways--a ticket can be 10€ one day and over 50€ the next, for no real reason. Since there is no competition, the customer service is garbage to--no need to be nice when your the only dog in town.


reply posted on 16-4-2009 @ 01:30 PM by justsomeboreddude
reply to post by PammyK



There is this old fashion thing called saving and buying what you can afford. A person can either save up to buy a new car or save up to buy a used car that is within their budget. Oh yeah, I forgot no one in our country learned how to save money, and nobody could save money because a third of thier money goes to paying taxes. Never mind.


reply posted on 16-4-2009 @ 01:34 PM by cautiouslypessimistic
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
reply to
post by cautiouslypessimistic



Money will be spent regardless. It is just better for people and buisnesses to make the choices on how to spend the money than it is for the government to take it from us and decide how they think it should be spent. The federal government employees 12% of the US workforce. That is insanity. If they cut spending and taxes by 25% this economy would light up like a Christmas tree.

Government doesnt make money they spend money. They are on the liablity side of the balance sheet.

[edit on 16-4-2009 by justsomeboreddude]

[edit on 16-4-2009 by justsomeboreddude]


You do know what a mix of coporate and political control is right?

I am not one who EVER thinks putting money and power in the hands of the corporations is a good thing. Trickle down DOESNT WORK. The only way an economy grows is by the people, not by the government, not by the corporations.

I agree you can shrink gov't, but I dont see what that has to do with this topic. I mean, I am "technically" a government employee, because I work in a school with special ed kids. Should spending on me be CUT?


reply posted on 16-4-2009 @ 01:34 PM by Unmask The Deception
reply to post by Seekerof



There is no need for someone to crap out money. The need of money to get things done is just an illusion.

Who needs money to build this railway when you have control of the slaves (American People).


reply posted on 16-4-2009 @ 01:48 PM by FlyersFan
reply to post by imitator



Oh lookie at the maps .. they all converge on CHICAGO. Obama is making sure his nefarious underworld buddies in Chicago get a piece of the action, and a piece of the pie.


reply posted on 16-4-2009 @ 01:53 PM by justsomeboreddude
reply to post by FlyersFan



I am sure that is purely coincidental. Remember Obama is transparent. Its a new regime with new morals. He would never do something like that. Would he?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^