It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Aircraft Pilots film UFO over Pennsylvania

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Apr, 16 2009 @ 06:05 PM
That vertical line also stays in the same position relative to that warped-pacman shaped cloud.

dos-equis :]
if you can't tell i'm bored.

posted on Apr, 16 2009 @ 06:52 PM
i just put a few stills in photoshop and enhanced the image a bit to see if theres anything that stands out. Whats interesting is there is a distortion around the object which is typical of a flying saucer. This really does not look like a water droplet of any sort. But its impossible to be able to tell whether it is faked or not cause the quality is just so poor. Im on the fence with this and the fact that there is no audio is suspicious.

posted on Apr, 16 2009 @ 06:59 PM
it bugs me that it appears to be reflective material that isn't reflecting the atomsphere around it. it should be virtually invisible if it's reflecting

posted on Apr, 16 2009 @ 08:00 PM
we need to find the original file ... lets go guys

2 line lets go ...................................................................................

posted on Apr, 16 2009 @ 10:43 PM
reply to post by karl 12
I could not make out much of the second half.

The fisrt part though, I don't think it disappeared.
It looked like it shot off to the left at extreme speeds.
I was able to pause it at 14 seconds in at catch what I think is the object streaking out of frame on the left side.

EDIT- I just watched it again on the eyepod site and saw the same thing. You can only see it when fully zoomed out. Camera speed is too slow. Between frames, a split second, the object has already accelerated almost out of frame.

My opinion for what its worth.

[edit on 16-4-2009 by GuyverUnit I]

posted on Apr, 17 2009 @ 12:08 AM
Another blurry,shaky video of something that's not identifiable as anything really.
Why do these old blurry,shaky,crappy videos keep popping up all the time?.
I really would like to see footage of something that was clearly visible without having to wonder if it is anything at all,even if I can't identify it.
Same old same old.

posted on Apr, 17 2009 @ 12:16 AM
nah, if anything was there, it would have shown up on radar as a blip. They mentioned nothing not responding tto communications and no non-transponder emitting aerial craft...

You will know if there is something spooking the airspace of the U.S. as you'd have a scramble of fighter jets to intercept...

For instance that Cessna plane incident a week ago. Nothing can penetrate our airspace without raising hell...

Now especially a slow moving aircraft...

A meteor might move so fast that it won't show or will be in and out too fast to track or too small to track I forget which and defy radar...

[edit on 4/17/2009 by Brainiac]

posted on Apr, 17 2009 @ 12:41 AM
It is fake, an Image edit and morphing. They have not shown the person with Camera at the time the UFO is filmed and the guy is UFO chaser UFO and he sees a UFO ! Wow, I want to become one so that I also get to see one

[edit on 17-4-2009 by sunny_2008ny]

posted on Apr, 17 2009 @ 03:02 AM

Originally posted by ls1cameric
Why do all the sceptics come on and instantly start saying it's a fake without any evidence at all?

And a very blurry, pixelised video *is* proof?

Just because YOU dont want to believe it's real doesnt mean that it's not...

I think this is a real video without any editing at all. And I also doubt that it's a camera effect your seeing... These guys are pilots who see all types of aircraft and they obviously filmed it because it was very unusual.

No one here said they don't WANT to believe it's real -- in fact, I would guess most ATSers *want* it to be real and want *to believe* it's real. However, they use their logical deductions and experience of watching countless videos and can make a fairly good personal assessment of whether it's a real Unidentified Flying Object or some other natural, explainable phenomenon.

And so long as people remain logical, we will end up with better credibility and a better chance of seeing 'real' UFOs.

Personally, I don't think the video show's UFOs - as others have said, most likely water droplets or something else but it just doesn't scream 'UFO' to me.

posted on Apr, 17 2009 @ 03:16 AM

Originally posted by Solomons
I think its a fake..but i'd also like to say i think that UFO's oscillate and thats why it seems they disappear when they actually dont(in genuine videos)..of course im not an image specialist so i'd like to see experts opinion,but i think just from looking and judging that its a fake.

It's not a fake but it's not necessarily a (alien) UFO either. As per usual the quality of the film is poor and the resolution that low that you can count the pixels that make up the UFO!

This means there is no way of identifying whether the object is an (alien) UFO or some natural phenomena, floating rubbish etc!

They are quite literally a UFO and USO!

If believers jump up and down exclaiming superb evidence they are merely handing the debunkers a barrel load of please don't.

posted on Apr, 17 2009 @ 03:27 AM

Originally posted by kcfusion
I always have a problem with videos that cut out the audio. Why cut out the audio unless there is something to hide? The audio is a vital clue to the validity of a video clip, to me anyway..

Phage you have used the water droplet explaination so much now I feel it should be added to the long lists of swamp gas, weather balloons etc

To me no audio, poor quailty =

Um... do you think just possibly it's because they're in a small aircraft that generates a lot of propellor noise ? ... Would you prefer the sound of the propellors and people shouting over it to hear each other ?

posted on Apr, 17 2009 @ 03:30 AM

Originally posted by Phage
I go along with Nohup's assessment. It looks like a water drop. The apparent motion of the object duplicates but exaggerates the motion of the background due to camera motion.

The object "in the water" could be almost anything. A large bird, another airplane. The quality make it impossible to tell. It displays no remarkable motion. There is no reason to think it's in the water.

The object "under water"? Again, the quality is terrible. Could be a reflection.

I don't see anything under the heading "corkscrew effect".

[edit on 4/16/2009 by Phage]

Okay water drop ?? - on the side of a plane ? ... you'd think at that speed ... honestly do I need to continue ?

posted on Apr, 17 2009 @ 05:12 AM
reply to post by ArMaP

You've got some good eyes there, Armap!
It took me a couple of goes but now I can see how that shiny dot moves exactly with that white line.
IMHO it’s going to have to be some sort of reflection on the window of the plane or the camera lens.
I don’t think there’s anything out there “flying” around.
I couldn’t make out anything much from the lake shots & I couldn’t make out anything at all from the “corkscrew” finale.

posted on Apr, 17 2009 @ 06:07 AM

Would you prefer the sound of the propellors and people shouting over it to hear each other ?

I can't speak for the other dude, that yes, that's exactly what I want and what everyone who has ever watched an aviation video wants. Anything else is rather annoying. That's besides the point; FAKE UFO videos typically have very dubious sound.

Okay water drop ?? - on the side of a plane ? ... you'd think at that speed ... honestly do I need to continue ?

Yes, in real life you do get water droplets running across the windows even in sometimes in relatively good weather. However, in this case I don't believe it to be the case as there is only a sinlge 'droplet' (UFO) not many, furthermore, droplets do not change direction - the wind blows it in only one direction. And it doesn't look like a droplet.

A higher resolution video would be nice............. as well as one with sound. Looks like a reflection on the window though... I don't think it's nessarily fake but rather, inconclusive.

[edit on 17/4/2009 by C0bzz]

posted on Apr, 17 2009 @ 11:11 AM
Looks like a reflection to me as well. The part that gets me is "UFO Chaser".

Storm chasers can relatively accurately predict where tornados are going to spawn so they can chase them and film them. But you cannot predict where UFO's are going to be flying around unless you make up (hoax) the UFO's.

[edit on 17-4-2009 by _BoneZ_]

top topics

<< 1   >>

log in