Tribune
"In terms of the vice president, I don't know," McClellan said. "There's a lot of suspicion there."
Suspicion. No facts.
However, McClellan said he did not have direct knowledge of who specifically was responsible for the "culture of deception" he frequently referred to in his book.
"I do not know whether a crime was committed by any of the administration officials who revealed Valerie Plame's identity to reporters. Nor do I know if there was an attempt by any person or persons to engage in a cover-up during the investigation.''
Smith questioned McClellan's motives for writing the book: "It's hard to take Mr. McClellan or this hearing seriously. Despite what Mr. McClellan says regarding Iraq, three different studies... conclude that intelligence reports were not altered in the lead-up to the war.''
"Since Mr. McClellan has included no footnotes in his book and few direct quotes or written memos are cited, is this book just a typical opinion piece without evidence to support his assertions?'' Smith asked.
There are tons of such stories and quotes by McClellen.
He wrote a book based on insinuation and suspicion .
He gave no evidence and no quotes ... no back up.
He just wanted to make money and the best way was a hit piece on
an unpopular administration.
But this isn't a Scott McClellen thread ... it's your Fox thread.
So I'll stop there. As I said .. plenty of McClellen quotes out there ...
He even admits his book isn't fact.
I'm off to the Farmers Market. mmmmm ....
