reply to post by Sargoth
Here's my last reply. You're simply re-editing posts and using insults to gain a response. It's called trolling. You haven't made an
assertion other than...
I believe there are many chambers and a huge bldg. under the Giza plateau. The underground city or whatever you want to call it, was abandoned and is
probably flooded. There is much info. on it in Drunvalo Melchizedek's 2 books.
I explained that the idea's popular, but unsupported by evidence. I pointed out that Melchizedec has a credibility problem and added that people have
been looking for hidden chambers etc at Giza for centuries. All credible information and easy to source.
Hey Genius, you obviously failed to look at the second link because it shows the photos of some of the labyrinth.
I explained that the 'labyrinth' described in the link was Herodotus' account of the temple complex at
Hawarra. The link you insist on reposting and claiming has been unread is
misleading. It's inaccurate. It's claim of a labyrinth isn't as simple as 'underground tunnels.' You edited a post to change your description. At
least have the courage of your original convictions...why water them down and then add insults? I hope your mother never finds out! What will the
neighbors think?
The Labyrinth contained 1500 rooms and an equal number of underground chambers that the Greek historian was not permitted to inspect, according
to Labyrinth priests, "the passages were baffling and intricate", designed to provide safety for the numerous scrolls they said were hidden in
subterranean apartments.
Many ancient writers supported Herodotus' record of underground passages connecting major pyramids, and their evidence casts doubt on the
reliability of traditionally presented Egyptian history. Crantor (300 BC) stated that there were certain underground pillars in Egypt that contained a
written stone record of pre-history , and they lined access ways connecting the pyramids.
The popular supposition that the Sphinx is the true portal of the Great Pyramid has survived with surprising tenacity. That belief was
substantiated by 100-year-old plans prepared by Masonic and Rosicrucian initiates, showing the Sphinx was the ornament surmounting a hall that
communicated with all Pyramids by radiating underground passages.
The expedition carried down generators and inflatable rafts and travelled along an underground river that led to a lake one kilometer wide. On the
shores of the lake nestles the city, and permanent lighting is provided by large crystalline balls set into the cavern walls and ceiling. A second
entry to the city is found in stairs leading up to the basement of the Coptic Church in old Cairo (Babylon). Drawing from narratives of people
"living in the Earth" given in the books of Genesis, Jasher and Enoch, it is possible that the city was originally called Gigal.
These extracts are making the claim you originally supported that there is a city beneath Giza. A 1km lake with extant lighting and connected by
tunnels to pyramids and Cairo? So where is it? Where is the evidence? That's why I criticized Drunvalo as a credible source. All the sources you
provide are in the hope of suggesting that this underground city exists.
The second link you insist on re-posting is equally spurious. I provided two links to the
Osiris Shaft
A &
Osiris Shaft B that contain genuine archaeological data and images
taken in context. Still you insist that your
link is credible...
Having been guided by the non-local time reverse Andromedian Atum-Ptah in December 1997, with 33 dedicated Unity Units, to align the Djed Spine
Nile grid, to the Celestial Nile of the Milky Way, to non-local Universal Unified Man, Ptah instigated the requirement for our return. This time
during the last Time Gate that links in fractal resonance to 2010, during early February.
After a short meditative beckoning to the non-local time reverse intelligences, I took the next step. In okay light condition, at the far North
side, there were two metal ladders going down and the well equipment. These were emerged in darkness.
The guy's a fruity nutbar. I provide credible sources from people that have studied Egypt for decades. Their pages offer references and/or
information that can be cross-checked. You bring a guy (Drunvalo) that's traveled the galaxy and knows Thoth and another guy that speaks in a
language known as WTF? 'non-local time reverse intelligences?' It's meaningless babble. You throw in Larry Hunter as another 'credible' source
and guess what? He isn't a credible source. He's got the same taste in credible sources as you. He cites Edgar Cayce and Hoagland! Another
self-professed mystic and a guy that's so wrong he claims NASA airbrush images because they're embarrassed to admit he's right. None of which
bothers you in any way that I can recognize.
Nothing you have provided demonstrates the existence of a 'sunken city.' The Osiris Shaft (tomb if you prefer) isn't a labyrinth or a city. The
complex at Hawarra isn't either. Cayce, Hoagland, Melchizedec, Hunter, Blavatsky, Bushby and all the others guilty by association to your links are
not credible sources for archaeological evidence in Egypt.
Feel free to be insulting in your reply because unless you offer anything more substantial than re-edited posts and fringe nonsense you get the luxury
of the final word. Bear in mind, however, that your mother is probably already disappointed in your behavior already
No hard feelings Sargoth. If we cross paths on another thread, the slate's clean...unless you make a 'yo mamma' joke