If there is a god, its my opinion that this diety has no influence upon this reality whatsoever. It was created and left on auto-pilot from the
start.
If you change it to there IS a god, and he prefers to leave us up to our own business, that is Deism. Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and many
others out of our founding fathers were Deist—it had to do with the enlightenment.
Do also remember that there are two levels of evolution—the adaptation of one species to it’s surrounding environment and the changes it takes for one
species to break off into several independent, totally new species. Creationism—as talked about in the BIBLE supports the first, as does the
Evolution theory (it’s not law yet).
I might be back tracking a lil' here but . . .
As the story goes, God created the Heavens/Universe as well as Earth. With in that creation the Earth brought forth life.
Does God create all of us individually, no, but we are part of the creation.
Now the Adam and Eve thingy. People re-read the story. Jesus has to have a linage all the way back to Adam for the Bible to work. That linage is only
a few thousand years long. People have been on the planet for much longer. So I suggest if you are going to use Adam and Eve you might concider when
and who they were. And Gen. 2 kinda explains it. Adam was taken from a land and placed in the Garden. Eve was cloned from Adam. Before any children
were born to them, they were sent BACK to the land from which Adam was taken/abducted. Then they had two children. One sinned reallly bad and was sent
ot another KNOWN land in wich he found a wife had a kid and built a city.
Gods work with creation was done waaaaaaaaaaaaay before Adam and Eve. The LORD God however was not. He and his angels/celestials are the ones
responsible for mans adavancment from our primitive ancesotrs created millions of years ago via evolution.
Ok, just mentioned Adam as a way of getting to Noah—didn’t REALLY mention him—other than under the assumption that he was the original sinner. Most
people of a religious background know this one, so I didn’t plan on thinking overly much about it, since I HAAATTEE religious discussions, especially
when I know what I’m doing. (LONG STORY!)
Now that you mention it: If you are going to use a text, you USE THE TEXT, not opinion, especially without expressing it as opinion—the only reason I
bother to list scriptures with my arguments. I’m having a hard time separating the two from your statements and too many would take it as the
absolute truth FROM THE SCRIPTURES without looking it up. It’s easier to assume. (You don’t HAVE to; it just gives you more credibility. Remember;
we are supposed to be holding to the truth, here.)
REMEMBER: I’m not saying your beliefs are wrong. I could believe I’m a rock, if I wanted to. It’s still MY belief.
OK:
Genesis 2:6-8
But there went up (8799) a mist from the earth, and watered (8689) the whole face of the ground. And the LORD God formed (8799) man of the dust of
the ground, and breathed (8799) into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. And the LORD God planted (8799) a garden eastward
in Eden; and there he put (8799) the man whom he had formed (8804).
Genesis 4:1-2
And Adam knew * (8804) Eve his wife; and she conceived (8799), and bare * (8799) Cain, and said (8799), I have gotten (8804) a man from the LORD. And
she again (8686) bare (8800) his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper (8802) of sheep, but Cain was a tiller (8802) of the ground.
Genesis 4:16-17
And Cain went out (8799) from the presence of the LORD, and dwelt (8799) in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden. And Cain knew (8799) his wife; and
she conceived (8799), and bare (8799) Enoch: and he builded (8802) a city, and called (8799) the name of the city, after the name of his son,
Enoch.
Genesis 4:25
And Adam knew (8799) his wife again; and she bare (8799) a son, and called (8799) his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed (8804) me another
seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew (8804).
Out of this mess comes several things: Scriptures state he was made from dust and mist, i.e. water—sounds closest to a primordial soup, MUD. They
also state, in effect, that Eve was a clone—a bit supported by the fact that to be male you need a YX chromosome pair, not XX. (Oh-ho! A Genetic
mutation? A loss in DNA caused a mutation? Makes me wonder HOW MANY viable mutations are the result of DEVOLUTION, not EVOLUTION? Oh, I’m a woman
btw, and I don’t consider devolution something that makes me anything less than another, since I don’t consider the soul a result of genetic makeup.)
They also state that Adam and Eve had Cain and Abel—and DOES NOT state whether or not Cain was their first child—just the first mentioned AFTER Eden
was blocked by an angel with that big blasted sword. Now, the scriptures don’t make making your SISTER your wife TABOO until later. I think that’s
in Exodus. WE didn’t make 1st cousin wives taboo until sometime last century. I get real tired of people using modern assumptions on a totally
DIFFERENT AND ANCIENT culture.
Based upon scriptures, some of what you said is hogwash, but it doesn’t automatically make it so. It depends upon how much you want to believe the
scriptures.
Now, back to the handicapped discussion:
This poor child was in the middle of a religious class, and I was trying to give something more than opinion, something that might have been useful in
theological discussion.
My personal opinion is that you make your mistakes, and God deals with our mistakes as a part of his plans. Look at how we act; how can we assume
(yet again) that God has no plans for us when we plan for our children’s future. I still believe he is in control, in spite of giving us free will.
He allows conception to work, and the body does rid itself of non-viable pregs. It wasn’t until recently that we have found a way of making some of
those pregs. Viable. NOTE: I did not say that they shouldn’t be given chances to live, just that they didn’t happen as much.