there are responses about this show 3 different places here at ATS.
this link is from the history channel its self..
If you were actually paying attention to the episode
> you would have seen that the University Scientist
> (David Lamb) identified all the peaks and elements in
> his XRD. He noted a few unique things about his
> analysis; it contained a high content of Ag and
> included an amorphous peak along with polycrystalline
> peaks. His conclusion was that Bob Whites Object
> (BWO) was very different then any aluminum alloy he
> has seen. At the end of the show Bill stated that Mr
> Lamb had just called in and reported that through
> further analysis the BWO was a quasi crystal.
we have the exact xray defraction test results..the show did not
have time to cover the complete list.....its hard to squeeze 12 years worth of testing into 10 minutes.
as the new scientist states...the testing done so far is
documented and has been reviewed by others..this isnt being thrown out to the sheeples with out having
rock solid results of what we have found from the research
done so far.
we are saying on record exactly what we know now..the facts dont lie...
we have a piece of aluminum that matches nothing made on this planet now or in 1985 when bob white recovered it
on highway 6 west of grand junction colorado in 1985.
we can find absolutely NO PROCESS TO MAKE THIS OBJECT nor can we find anything that comes close to looking like the bob white artifact let alone do
half of what it is doing right now.
there is a readable EMF signal in the 500 hertz range coming from the object
and we have multipul testing showing gamma, beta, and fast neutron radiation being emmitted also.
for anyone to jump to the conclusion that the BWO object is MUNDANE shows the ignorance of THE homo sapians who think they got all the answers.
Mundane isnt the word i would use.
FANTASTIC, UNIQUE, REMARKABLE or BIZARRE would be the correct words to describe the artifact...
mundane just dont cover it.
as to why the ends of the object are flat is the little end was removed for tests done by NIDS and the large end was removed by LOS ALAMOS for tests
done at that lab.
as far as david lamb goes he didnt know what he was testing when we took in a sample of the object. we asked the university hes at to run the XRD
tests on a sample of metal..thats all they new at first..
after we had the tests documented on video we told the story...the university refused to bill us because they didnt want their name associated with
UFO's. imagine that. david couldnt say where he is at...you notice all the other names where covered also...that is CONSPRISY TO WITH HOLD EVIDENCE
and you would be thrown in jail if you did that in court.
david lamb had enough courage to come on record on national television and tell the truth about what he had found. thats all we have ever asked of any
that applies to the other scientist Chris Ellis and Dr Robert Gibbons who have gone on record
with true honest answers to what has been found so far.
dr gibbons credentials and expertise in his field as a specialist in nuclear medicine, and work done for NASA and many others is on the record. hes
knows what hes talking about when he opens his mouth.
dr gibbons please put your resume down for everyone to see..
[edit on 8-5-2009 by larryroyc]