It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
two different investigations have found evidence of a wire or string , and heck even without an enhancement you can see signs of a wire. it's obvious that you have selective vision.
Discussions were held with leaders in the field of research, including: optical science engineers, aeronautical engineers, computer programmers, laser specialists and photographic technicians and latest state-of-the-art equipment was reviewed and evaluated.
Basically we started by examining the sample transparency or negative with a laserscope, the same way used to examine black and white negatives with microscopes to determine fakes before computer came along, and we made preliminary judgements about factors. Laser technology makes it possible for a skilled examiner to determine much before he ever goes to the computer. He can set up a grid, 10,000 lines per centimeter veritical and horizontal, and go back and forth scanning the whole picture. With the laserscope we can blow up even further to look at individual grains or color laminations in the film emulsion and make judgements particle by particle. Laser holography is then used to provide a 3-dimensional image from a 2-dimensional picture. And laser projection of the hologram is so fine that a 10th of a centimeter square can be blown up to many feet to view the grains and laminations in graphic 3-D. The finest suspension threads and expert retouching overlaps should stand out graphically. Homogenity of the grains and color layers can be studied carefully for deviations from norm.
We still find no evidence of trickery in any of these photographs so enhanced. On the other hand, we find details revealed that tend more to establish the validity of the story told by the witness
Still another method referred to us by Ron Spanbauer of De Pere, Winsonsin was tried in judging the depth of field or distance of objects in the picture from the lens of the camera at the time photographs were made(SNIP) The Meier photographs from Switzerland analysed by this method were found to be consistent with the reported data, and with the photogrammetric and computer data generated
they did a great job proving the photos are nothing more than forced perspective using small ufo models. they also proved that the succession of the video has been tampered with in the part where the "beamship" disappears. it's very obvious that the tree limb is not in the same place before and after. clear sign of a Hoax
Wendall Stevens openly admits Meier had/has many models in his home and this picture proves that the ufo is not 20- 30 ft.... like Meier claims it is.
why do you ignore the testimony from his ex wife ?
The truth is my ex husband is lying regarding the ufo affair. when i saw the ufo pictures that looked like a wedding cake...i asked my self where did i see these lines before ? the underpart..i realized it was a lid from a trash can,,,i compared the lid from the spaceship and i identify these lines what is exactly on the lid.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by easynow
Indigo_Child ignores these facts because he/she is a pseudo-believer.
No matter the evidence against their case, they won't be swayed, which isn't a true believer (one who wants to find the truth from the rubbish, Meier Included).
In the end it hampers all efforts to find the truth...if this is deliberate or not, well only one person knows this...
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
reply to post by easynow
You are equivocating on my argument. I said to you that Meier's wife has later given testimony against Meier, and his children are giving testimony for Meier. You choose one as proof and reject the other. So are you being selective or not?
[edit on 18-4-2009 by Indigo_Child]
since the children only have $omething to gain by advocating this story i would not consider their testimony admissible as any kind of proof.
Popi's testimony has to be considered since she was there and knows what the trash can lid would look like.
You say that Meiers children have something to gain from the giving false testimony
So does his ex-wife, "retribution" and how do you know she was not paid to give her testimony?
You assume the trash can lid is the Wedding cake UFO
This is only a theory and an unproven and trite theory using embarrassing logic. It has already been falsified by the mass of empirical evidence gathered in scientific examinations that indeed corroborate the size of the UFO.
You keep repeating that you have proven it is a trashcan lid by posting photographs and declaring it is proof. It is proof of nothing. No matter how many times you repeat you have proven it, it will not be proof until you can demonstrate it conclusively and irrefutably.
it's kinda obvious to most people that it is in fact the container lid.
please specifficly direct me to the proven scientific evidence that show's and proves that indeed that the ufo is 20-30 ft.
(((no evidence from a Meier advocate can be accepted, sorry )))
Bring evidence. It only matters what you can prove, not how many people you can drum up who hold the same opinion.
Here you are asking Indigo if he accepts the possibility of him being wrong about something but you refuse to accept that possibility yourself?
Whats wrong with this picture?