It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jim Scott
reply to post by Zaphod58
The photo by Hubble assumes that the universe shown in the photo is 800 million years old. That means the positions of the astronomical objects, as shown, were in place at the time the universe was 800 million years old. That means that these objects were able to move to these positions shown in a period of no more than 800 million years, because they did not exist before 800 million years.
It's not my number, or my math. It's NASA math.
Originally posted by Jim Scott
Originally posted by Jadette
I think you misunderstand something.
The universe is between 13.5 and 14 Billion years old, best as we can tell. Lambda-Cold Dark Matter concordance model says that it is 13.75 billion years old, which is what I assumed the picture was using as a rough age of origin. So if we look out and 'back' 13 billion years, the universe we are looking at is less than a billion years old, and saying that it's 800 million fits right in with the Lambda-CDM concordance model. We are, in effect, looking back in time. Those objects do not exist right 'now' as we see them. What we see is limited by the speed of light.
From www.newscientist.com...:
The record for the most distant object in the Universe has been broken again. Astronomers have spied a galaxy burning an astonishing 13.6 billion light years away. Because its light has taken billions of years to travel to Earth, astronomers are seeing the galaxy as it looked when the Universe was only about 900 million years old.
As is typical of science, when confronted with broken fundamental laws, they argue that the laws do not apply. However, universally, if matter exceeds the speed of light, according to the Theory of Relativity, it assumes infinite mass. Since matter is exceeding the speed of light in the universe to make the universe, it must violate the Theory of Relativity. Sounds like a problem, expecially when matter is going at it at 25+ times the speed of light.
To answer your reply, if the matter appears to be 13.6 billion light years away, it must have separated from the origin point to a distance of 13.6 billion light years in 800 million years. Right? Ok, that's impossible according to the Theory of Relativity.
Originally posted by OmegaPoint
Since you cannot get something from nothing, there was a creator.
The first cause argument also leads to a creator, if you believe in causation that is.
Originally posted by spy66
Well this might be a stupid thing to come with in all this. But how old is the sun compared to all this. Is the light we are seeing to day the light from our sun or another sun from another galaxy ?
How can we tell ?
Have they also considered the angel of reflection compared to other suns or stars that also give off light or radiation ?
How can we place the origin of light or radiation ?
IS our reference or observation point the right one to use to determine actual time?
[edit on 27.06.08 by spy66]
Originally posted by andre18
No one knows what is beyond the point before the seconds before the big bang
Originally posted by king9072
Originally posted by spy66
Well this might be a stupid thing to come with in all this. But how old is the sun compared to all this. Is the light we are seeing to day the light from our sun or another sun from another galaxy ?
How can we tell ?
Have they also considered the angel of reflection compared to other suns or stars that also give off light or radiation ?
How can we place the origin of light or radiation ?
IS our reference or observation point the right one to use to determine actual time?
[edit on 27.06.08 by spy66]
It takes 8 minutes for the light to travel from our sun to earth. If for some reason someone through a big cover over the sun, then instantly pulled it off, it would take 8 minutes before we had light again.
The light we see, is only from our sun.
Originally posted by ravenshadow13
Why I don't- I believe in random events and I don't believe in God.
But to each their own.
And I think even if I did believe in God, I would need to understand God more with more physical evidence to believe that He would be capable of creating not the universe itself but the forces within the universe.
Originally posted by king9072It takes 8 minutes for the light to travel from our sun to earth. If for some reason someone through a big cover over the sun, then instantly pulled it off, it would take 8 minutes before we had light again.
Originally posted by Republican08
No offense at all.
I believe saying "God" manufactured this, instead of saying, we just don't know enough right now to realize how it happened, is a cop out, It's stunts our growth, it keeps us from making those thoughts that progress us, instead of saying how did this happen, you say Well God can do anything.
Thus we downgrade
Saying that the Universe broke the sound barrier, wouldn't be that far fetched. When it did, these events took place.
But then again, we just plain out don't know, and I would rather look for the answers then say "I have faith in god, he did it" and learn nothing.
No offense, if you believe in God GREAT, if you don't thats GREAT to.
.....Don't flame me