It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Malcram
Yeah, I saw that. I thought there was supposed to be one, giant, slow moving UFO. Seems he is contributing yet another conflicting eyewitness report of the Battle of Los Angeles. They also got the date wrong, BTW.
Whether or not FEMA approved the book (not sure Paranormal Net is an authority) is not really germane to this being an "admission" of the existence of aliens. As I said, there is a lot more to the book than this single chapter. Why throw out the bathwater with the baby?
No.
The point I was trying to make that in a high stress situation, at night, under blackout conditions and the threat of Japanese attack eyewitness reports are not reliable. As demonstrated by the various and often conflicting reports from that incident.
The only things I have see presented as evidence were links to pages where other people or organisations used the same name, "FEMA's Fire Officer's Guide to Disaster Control", and considering FEMA exists and publishes manuals, I think that we can have more than just evidence that the book is from FEMA, we can have confirmation.
Originally posted by platosallegory
Well if you don't want to accept that it's from FEMA after all the evidence that has been presented then that's your problem.
I ask for more evidence because I have not seen any official reference to the book as being from FEMA.
Nobody can make you accept something if you look at the evidence, then reject it and still ask for more evidence.
You are wrong, this would happen (and has happened) in any circumstance in which I see something (in this case the book) presented as something else (the book being from FEMA) without any evidence on that on the something itself (it does not say it in the book that it is from FEMA or endorsed by FEMA).
I'm sure this wouldn't occur if it didn't have a chapter in it about UFO's.
My point is that the evidence that has been presented is just one piece of evidence, that other people (neither the authors or FEMA) call it "FEMA's Fire Officer's Guide to Disaster Control", and as FEMA exists it should be possible to find the book in a list of FEMA books or FEMA endorsed or approved publications.
My point is, you keep asking for evidence when evidence has been presented over and over again.
Originally posted by earthman4
A UFO could be a commercial airliner or a piece of paper in the wind. It is not identified. Now if FEMA had guidelines for an alien spacecraft, that would be news.
Originally posted by ArMaP
The fact that many people call it "the FEMA Fire Officer's Guide to Disaster Control" it does not mean that it is an official FEMA manual (if those things exist).
-I would consider it a FEMA manual if....
- If this is an official (in any way) FEMA manual, and they wanted it to be known, why was that chapter removed? If it's not a FEMA manual, why was the chapter removed?
PPS: Malcram, could you please remove the underlining on your signature, it looks strange, making your posts look "dense". Thanks.
Originally posted by Nightchild
Originally posted by earthman4
A UFO could be a commercial airliner or a piece of paper in the wind. It is not identified. Now if FEMA had guidelines for an alien spacecraft, that would be news.
Like this? : "In addition, if the apparent visits by alien beings and their space vehicles should pose any type of threat, it will, as always, be the fire service that is called upon to provide the first line of life-saving defense and disaster mitigation."